Active clinical trials for "Cancer Pain"

This was a six-month open-label extension (OLE) study to evaluate the safety of long-term nabiximols (Sativex®) therapy when used as an adjunctive treatment in participants with advanced cancer. The study provided continued availability of nabiximols to participants who completed a preceding Phase 3 study and new (de novo) participants.

This is a placebo-controlled, double blind, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KW-2246 as rescue medication at an optimal dose, which is determined by dose titration in treating breakthrough pain episodes in adult cancer patients receiving strong opioid analgesic on a fixed-schedule as well as rescue medication for breakthrough pain.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of Once-Daily OROS ("Osmotic Release Oral System" [a controlled release oral medication delivery system in the form of a tablet]) hydromorphone for cancer pain treatment in Korean cancer patients.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether dexmedetomidine added to morphine is effective in the treatment of chronic cancer pain.

The purpose of this study is two-fold. First, the investigator will develop a low-literacy Mobile Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) protocol for cancer patients with pain (i.e., therapist manual, patient manual including handouts, and the smartphone materials) as well as a beta version of the basic smartphone components with the assistance of experts in the field. Next, an iterative development design using focus groups with women who have breast cancer and pain accrued from medically underserved areas will be used to refine the developed mPCST protocol and basic smart phone components. The protocol-designed to reduce cancer pain and disability in patients with low literacy in medically underserved areas-will be delivered via tele-video conferencing sessions in the community clinic. The smartphone tools (e.g., simple text messages, images, and preloaded intervention content) will allow the intervention to extend into the patients' homes. The second study purpose is to pilot test the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of the developed protocol. The investigator will also obtain an estimate of the effect size of the developed protocol to decrease pain. Focus group data will be managed and evaluated in a systematic format using a grounded theory approach. Data analyses for the pilot testing period of the study will be assessed by examining accrual, attrition, and adherence to the intervention. Simple t-tests will be used to examine pre- to post-intervention differences in pain and the other outcomes of interest. There are minimal risk or safety issues related to this study.

This trial is a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART), that will examine response to differing doses of a behavioral cancer pain intervention (Pain Coping Skills Training [PCST]) and subsequent response-based adjustments to doses. Cancer patients with pain will initially be randomized to receive either PCST-Full or PCST-Brief. Participants who do not report pain reduction to their initially assigned intervention will be re-randomized to receive either maintenance or an increased level of intervention. Participants who report pain reduction to their initially assigned intervention will be re-randomized to either a maintenance dose or no further treatment. Intervention responses will be compared across conditions using a standard two-sided, two-sample t-test. Techniques typically used for SMART studies will be used to compare intervention dosage sequences across PCTS that adjusts to initial dosage based on patient responses. The risk and safety issues in this trial are low and limited to those common to a psychosocial intervention (e.g., loss of confidentiality).

A large number of studies have shown that patients feel more satisfied with hydromorphone in the pain management. and a systematic review found that hydromorphone may be better suited than morphine for titration of acute analgesia. However, current researches on intravenous opioid titration for cancer pain such as hydromorphone are relatively insufficient in China. Therefore, a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study is conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of comparing patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) versus non-PCA intravenous hydromorphone titration for severe cancer pain.

The study is a multicenter, open-label Phase 1b single dose escalation safety study for adult subjects with intractable pain associated with cancer in any area below the mid-thoracic level who meet all other eligibility criteria.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety/tolerability and clinical utility of low-dose transdermal therapeutic system (TTS [medicated adhesive pad that is placed on the skin to deliver a timed-release dose of medication through the skin into the bloodstream]) - fentanyl in Taiwan participants with cancer pain. Secondly, to demonstrate the dropout rate that will be decreased by initiating therapy with12 microgram per hour (mcg/hr) instead of with 25 mcg/h.

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of JNJ-42160443 with placebo in the treatment of chronic, moderate to severe cancer-related pain in terminally ill patients with a diagnosis of active cancer.