Active clinical trials for "Opioid-Related Disorders"

This is an open-label study in treatment seeking opioid-dependent subjects for safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy markers, and opioid receptor availability of subcutaneous injections of depot buprenorphine after induction and stabilization of treatment seeking subjects onto Subutex. Subjects were planned to receive 4 subcutaneous (SC) injections of RBP-6000 separated by 28 days (Cohorts 1-5) or 6 SC injections of RBP-6000 separated by 28 days (Cohort 6) after a 13-day induction and dose stabilisation period on SUBUTEX Sublingual (SL) tablet at dose levels of 8-24 mg.

This application seeks to address the problem of opioid withdrawal by examining the utility of the L-type calcium channel blocker (CCB) isradipine as an adjunct to BUP detoxification. This project will address the need for improved detoxification strategies by assessing the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of adjunct isradipine during a BUP detoxification in opioid-dependent participants. This pilot clinical trial will determine the potential utility of the L-type CCB isradipine to improve treatment outcomes in up to 60 opioid-dependent individuals undergoing a BUP detoxification procedure. Specifically, this study will determine the efficacy of isradipine to reduce withdrawal symptoms, craving, and illicit use of opioids in opioid-dependent individuals undergoing BUP detoxification and determine the tolerability and safety of controlled-release isradipine (10 mg/day) in opioid-dependent individuals undergoing BUP detoxification. Currently, the only FDA-approved medications for opioid withdrawal are the opioid agonists methadone and BUP, both of which have abuse liability. Our findings, if positive, will support a larger phase II clinical trial.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Suan-Zao-Ren Tang in improving sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and heroin craving among methadone-maintained persons with sleep complaints.

In this study, we will assess opioid self-administration in a laboratory setting in persons with pain who have a history of opioid abuse. Participants diagnosed with mild to moderate pain will be admitted to hospital for 7 weeks and transitioned from their baseline prescription opioid to a standing daily dose of Suboxone (buprenorphine/naloxone combination). During this maintenance period, participants will have the opportunity in a laboratory setting to self-administer oxycodone; subjective responses as well as analgesic, physiological and performance effects will be measured. In the second phase of this study, the same patients who participated in the inpatient phase will be followed on an outpatient basis while maintained on Suboxone for 12 weeks. . The hypotheses of this study are that (1) higher progressive ratio break-point values for oxycodone, higher subjective ratings of euphoria, and less pain relief will predict early relapse to opioid abuse; (2) the abuse liability measures will be more strongly correlated with relapse than the pain measures; (3) subjective ratings of euphoria will increase and of pain will decrease in an oxycodone dose-dependent manner (i.e. euphoria will increase and pain will decrease as dose increases); and (4) experimentally induced pain will decrease in an oxycodone dose-dependent manner.

The purpose of this study was to assess retention in treatment after induction with buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX) sublingual tablets compared with generic buprenorphine and after stabilization with BNX sublingual tablets compared with BNX film. Secondary objectives included assessment of treatment effects on opioid withdrawal symptoms, opioid cravings, and safety.

CTN-0051 assesses the comparative effectiveness of extended release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX, Vivitrol®), an opioid antagonist recently approved and indicated for the prevention of relapse to opioid dependence, versus buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX, Suboxone®), a high affinity partial agonist indicated for maintenance treatment of opioid dependence, as pharmacotherapeutic aids to recovery. The study is conducted in 8 NIDA Clinical Trials Network affiliated community based treatment programs. Up to 600 eligible participants will be randomized to treatment with XR-NTX or BUP-NX for 24 weeks (sufficient to include 350 participants who are randomized more than 72 hours after their last opioid). The primary goal of the study is to estimate the difference, if one exists, between XR-NTX and BUP-NX in the distribution of the time to relapse (i.e.., loss of persistent abstinence) during the 6-month trial. Secondary objectives are to: (1) compare outcome on XR-NTX versus BUP-NX across a range of clinical safety and secondary efficacy domains, and (2) explore demographic and, clinical, and genetic predictors of successful treatment and moderators of differential effectiveness (i.e., what variables may help clinicians choose which of these treatments is best for a given patient).), and (3) collect a limited dataset to permit analyses of economic costs and benefits of the two treatments.

The purpose of this study is to look at the efficacy and safety for lofexidine hydrochloride, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist under development for the treatment of acute withdrawal from short-acting opioids. The study takes place in 2 parts: a 7-day inpatient double-blind treatment portion where subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three doses of study medication (2.4 mg total daily dose of lofexidine, 3.2 mg total daily dose of lofexidine, or placebo) followed by an optional open-label treatment period where subjects will be inpatient or outpatient and receive lofexidine at variable dosing for up to an additional 7 days. The Investigator hypothesizes that subjects will achieve maximum treatment effect with tolerable side effects at the 3.2 mg total daily dose and that both the 3.2 mg and 2.4 total daily doses will show better efficacy over placebo in treating symptoms of acute opioid withdrawal.

This is a randomized, 4-sequence, 2-period, double-blind, placebo controlled study in male and female subjects with an American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of cocaine abuse.

The purpose of this study is to determine the best strategy of administering gabapentin in connection with our current approach to perioperative pain management. We aim to evaluate two different adjunct gabapentin regimens given in the perioperative period, and to identify which manages patient pain more effectively and safely. In this evaluation, we will identify the quantity of patients' opioid consumption, the quality of their pain management, and the frequency and severity of any side effects they might experience. Patients who are undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) and choose to participate will be randomly assigned to a treatment group using computer-generated randomization. Patients in group 1 (the control group) will receive the standard of care as pertains to gabapentin. This consists of a single 600 mg dose of gabapentin administered to the patient approximately one to two hours before surgery, then a dose of 600 mg each morning during postoperative admission. Patients in Group 2 will receive 600 mg preoperatively, plus an additional postoperative gabapentin regimen: they will take 300 mg of gabapentin every 8 hours for 1 week, then a single nightly dose of 300 mg for another month.

Intranasal (IN) naloxone administration is an effective alternative to intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) naloxone by emergency medical services for opioid overdoses and has been used successfully for this purpose as reported in clinical observational studies and a randomized controlled trial. Most of the published clinical studies concerning IN administration used an improvised kit of 2 mg naloxone/2 mL saline and a mucosal atomizer device (MAD), which is not FDA-approved for this indication. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data using these kits is not available in the published literature. This study is designed to determine the PK of naloxone following one and two IN administrations using the improvised kits compared to 2 and 4 mg delivered IN using the FDA-approved Narcan nasal spray device and 2 mg administered IM using the Evzio autoinjector.