Active clinical trials for "Opioid-Related Disorders"

The RECOVER Study will examine clinical, environmental and socioeconomic factors in recovery from opioid use disorder (OUD) over a 24-month period following exit from a Phase III clinical program for a buprenorphine extended-release injection (RBP-6000). The study population will consist of participants from studies NCT02357901 (RB-US-13-0001) and NCT02510014 (RB-US-13-0003). The RECOVER study will characterize OUD subjects' recovery process as they transition from the controlled clinical trial environment to the real world setting.

prescription opioid misuse in chronic pain is a growing public health concern. few studies got interested in prevalence of misuse and of opiate use disorder in a population of patients with a non cancer chronic pain. the investigators analyzed during 3 months opiate misuse and opiate ude disorder in a population of patients consulting a center specialized in pain management.

The overall aim of the study is to explore substance use, tobacco use and lifestyle-related health problems among ageing patients in Opioid Maintenance Treatment (OMT), and other SUD treatment. The study will use already collected data from the multi-center, longitudinal, observational NorComt study (Norwegian Cohort of Patients in Opioid Maintenance Treatment and Other Drug Treatment study). NorComt is the largest longitudinal study of SUD patients in Norway. The data consists of data from OMT and other substance use disorders (SUD) treatment (N=548).

This is a prospective observational case-control study comparing quantitative sensory testing data preformed during the third trimester of pregnancy and within 24 hours postpartum in women on medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) to a gestational age-controlled cohort of women who do not have OUD. The primary goal is to measure elements of quantitative sensory testing including temperature pain threshold, temperature pain tolerance, and thermal and mechanical temporal summation for patients with opioid use disorder on medication-assisted treatment (MAT), and compare these results to gestational age matched controlled pregnant patients not on MAT.

Opioid use is increasing in Western countries and is associated with harms as hospitalization, addiction and deaths(1). Community pharmacists interact frequently with patients, giving them the opportunity to identify and prevent the risk of prescribed opioid misuse. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the risk of prescribed opioids misuse in ambulatory patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) seen in community pharmacies. Method: A questionnaire (including the Prescription Opioid Misuse POMI(2)) have been proposed to patients with opioid prescription by pharmacy students, in 86 pharmacies of Occitanie-Est, in April 2019. Eligible patients were adults with CNCP that consented to participate. A total of 414 patients (62.4% women, mean age 58 ± 16.00) have been included. The main pains were spinal (37.3%) and osteoarticular (33.1%). The median visual analog scale (VAS) was 7 [IQR25-75: 5-8]. The prescribed opioids are mainly weak opioids (73.2%): paracetamol/tramadol (35%), paracetamol/codeine (17.4%), paracetamol/opium (16.8%). Strong opioids (32.6%) were oxycodone (11.95%), fentanyl (9%), and morphine (9%). The median morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was 40 mg/day [IQR25-75: 20-80]. POMI score was superior to 2/6 in 45.4% and superior to 4 in 16%. The main positive question were feel high (40.3%), take the opioid more often (39.3%), take more medication (36.6), and need to early renew opioid medication earlier (30.8%). Patients with POMI score > 4 were younger (49 years versus 55.9; p<0.01), more urban (78.1% versus 69.2%; p=0.03), had higher VAS (7.3 versus 6.2; p<0.01), received higher median MME (112 mg versus 64.9 mg; p<0.01), and consumed more strong opioid (45.3% versus 27.3%; p=0.04).

The purpose of this study is to learn what resources are needed to improve outcomes for patients with opioid use disorder. The study will look at how patients engage in treatment and the decisions that patients and providers make regarding treatment, specifically buprenorphine treatment, for opioid use disorder. The aims of this study are: To evaluate using mixed methods the feasibility and acceptability of OUD screening, ED-initiated BUP, and referral. Over the course of the study and as XR-BUP is added to hospital formularies, to estimate the percentage and confidence intervals of patients assessed, treated, and engaged in treatment at Day 30. This will be a three-site study employing a multi-faceted approach to facilitate clinical protocol implementation and to assess feasibility, acceptability, and impact. Investigators will develop, introduce and update site-specific ED clinical protocols and implementation plans for OUD screening, ED-initiated BUP, and referral for treatment. A participatory action research approach will be utilized along with mixed methods incorporating data derived from: Medical record and administrative data abstraction, Research assessments involving patients who are eligible for and willing to receive ED-initiated BUP (including both those who do, and do not, receive BUP); these assessments will document the index ED visit and the 30th day after the index ED visit, Qualitative interviews, focus groups, and quantitative assessments involving providers and staff, patients, and other stakeholders.

The study objective is to characterise the long-term plasma exposure to buprenorphine after stopping SUBLOCADE treatment. There are no interventions planned. This multicentre investigation will enroll participants from Study RB-US-13-0003 (NCT02510014) or both Studies RB-US-13-0003 and INDV-6000-301 (NCT02896296) and who received at least 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections of SUBLOCADE. There are two parts to the study: Part A consists of a single visit during which urine samples are collected to measure free buprenorphine and free norbuprenorphine concentrations; qualitative urine drug samples (UDS) for opioids, including buprenorphine; quantitative UDS for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone; and determination of creatinine concentration. Blood samples are collected for the determination of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine plasma concentrations. Results on the quantitative UDS performed in Part A determine enrollment in Part B: participants who provide a quantifiable (i.e., positive) result for buprenorphine and/or norbuprenorphine and a non-quantifiable (i.e., negative) result for naloxone meet continuation criteria to move on to Part B if Part B is still open to enrolment. Part B consists of two visits 30 days apart in which the same tests are run as were done in Part A.

Many buprenorphine treatment programs do not have services dedicated to adolescents and young adults. As a precursor to developing and evaluating an adolescent and young adult buprenorphine treatment program at APT Foundation Inc, we propose to conduct a 1 year prospective study of 16 to 25 year old treatment-seeking individuals enrolled in the APT Adolescent and Young Adult Suboxone Program

The purpose of the study is to conduct a follow-up of substance abuse patients (n=1,269) about 2 to 5 years since they were originally recruited from 8 substance abuse treatment clinics (located in 5 states) to participate in a prior clinical trial study called "START" (Starting Treatment with Agonist Replacement Therapies). The START Follow-up Study will be conducted over 5 years and will involve three follow-up interviews with START participants. The specific aims of the START Follow-up Study are as follows. To determine longer-term outcomes of Suboxone versus methadone treatment received in the START To investigate patient and treatment factors associated with post-START treatment access, utilization, and outcomes among Suboxone and methadone patients To explore other correlates of the long-term outcomes among START patients.

Chronic pain is a worldwide health problem due to its high prevalence and its difficult management with a significant impact on quality of life. Pain and addiction co-occur frequently. Indeed, the prevalence of addiction in patients with chronic non-cancer pain may affect from 0% to 50% of patients (Højsted et al 2010). This large variability in the estimation of addiction prevalence in chronic non-cancer pain patients is at least partly due to a lack of standardization of the selected patients from the clinical or therapeutic point of view and the lack of consensus in the use of a specific evaluation tool or gold standard. Indeed, several tools are currently available at the international level with varying efficiencies and precisions (Chou et al 2009, Turk, Swanson, and Gatchel 2008, Højsted and Sjøgren 2007). In France, no data are available on the prevalence of analgesic opioid misuse in chronic non-cancer pain patients, due to the lack clinical studies and validated tools in French.