Active clinical trials for "Osteomyelitis"

The purpose of this research study is to determine if rifampin, an antibiotic (a medicine that treats infections), is effective in treating osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of the foot in diabetic patients. Despite use of powerful antibiotics prescribed over a long period of time, many diabetic patients remain at a high risk for needing an amputation of part of the foot or lower leg because the osteomyelitis is not cured. Some small research studies have shown that addition of rifampin to other antibiotics is effective in treating osteomyelitis in both diabetics and non-diabetics. However, because few diabetics with osteomyelitis have been studied, there is no definite proof that it is better than the usual treatments for diabetic patients. If this study finds that adding rifampin to the usual antibiotics prescribed for osteomyelitis reduces the risk for amputations, doctors will be able to more effectively treat many Veteran patients with this serious infection. Improving treatment outcomes is an important healthcare goal of the VA.

This study evaluates the effect of additional hyperbaric oxygen therapy after lower extremity amputation. The patients will be randomized after amputation to either a treatment group receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy, or control group.

This study will be applied to evaluate effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on pediatric localized osteomyelitis.

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the safety and between-group effect size of Stimulan-VG compared to SoC treatment in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) of the forefoot.

Patients who are admitted to hospital with serious infections, such as those in bone, joints or spine, require a long course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. After an initial treatment course in hospital or through a dedicated outpatient antibiotic program many patients can complete their treatment course at home. Such infections are often caused by bacteria called Staphylococci, and currently there are three antibiotic options used routinely. A fourth antibiotic, ceftriaxone, is a promising alternative; it is also effective against Staphylococci, and is more convenient, less costly and easier to give at home, however, it has not been studied thoroughly in a prospective manner. This study will compare ceftriaxone to routinely used antibiotics (cloxacillin, cefazolin or daptomycin) to see if ceftriaxone is equally as safe and efficacious in curing deep-seated Staphylococcal infections in patients receiving home IV antibiotics. Patients with deep-seated infections caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species will be randomly assigned home IV treatment with ceftriaxone OR one of the three other antibiotics before leaving the hospital. Patients will then receive usual care from an Infectious Disease physician and Home IV team. The study team will assess whether cure has been achieved by the end of the IV treatment, follow-up at 6 months to see if patients remain infection-free, and record any side-effects of treatment. The overall goal is to determine whether ceftriaxone can be considered non-inferior to usual antibiotic treatment in treating Staphylococcal infections in a home IV setting.

Chronic osteomyelitis is a serious osteoarticular infection that most often occurs in the long bones (tibia, femur, humerus), responsible for significant morbidity with risk of fracture and amputation. It is due to the presence of bacteria in the bone marrow, sometimes responsible for an intraosseous abscess. Chronic osteomyelitis can have a hematogenous or more often exogenous origin, after trauma or surgery. The bacteria involved have the ability to modify their metabolism and involve persistence mechanisms (such as biofilm) making them difficult to eradicate. The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis requires surgery, i.e. corticotomy, which means opening of the bone cortex to perform an endomedullary curettage to identify the bacteria, remove any sequestration (bone fragments to which the bacteria adhere as biofilm) and reduce the bacterial inoculum. At the same time, or at a second stage, a skin and soft tissue/muscle flap may be required, especially in patients with long-standing disease with embrittlement and adhesion of the skin and soft tissue to the underlying bone. Post-operatively, the patient receives a probabilistic systemic antibiotic therapy and then a systemic antibiotic therapy targeted on the identified germ, for a period of 3 months. The effectiveness of these antibiotics is based on their ability to penetrate bone tissue. Despite the progress made in both antibiotics and surgical treatments, the probability of failure (recurrence of infection) is around 20%, and has unfortunately remained stable for more than 20 years. Cerament-G (BONESUPPORT AB Laboratory, Sweden), a synthetic bone substitute composed of hydroxyapatite, calcium sulphate, and gentamicin, fills the "dead space" formed during surgery, prevents infection of this blood-filled cavity, and promotes bone regeneration within this space (limiting the risk of fracture in the medium and long term). Cerament-G also delivers locally very high doses of gentamicin (concentration of 17.5 mg/mL in the device) for several weeks. Gentamicine is a broad-spectrum bactericidal antibiotic effective against the vast majority of bacteria involved in osteoarticular infections. It provides effective local antibiotic therapy through wide exposure and prolonged concentrations during several weeks. To date, there is no other bone substitute with antibiotics available in France. Two prospective studies have shown that Cerament-G reduces the number of infectious recurrences (about 5%). This innovation is available in France but at a high price (between 2,500 and 4,000 euros) and is not currently reimbursed. However, the use of this product would make it possible to improve the health and quality of life of patients while avoiding certain consumption of resources.

This is a multi- centre trial of children with bone and joint infections (BJIs) at eight major paediatric hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. The primary objective is to establish if in children with acute, uncomplicated BJIs, entirely oral antibiotic treatment is not inferior to initial intravenous (IV) treatment for 1 to 7 days followed by an oral antibiotic course in achieving full recovery 3 months after presentation. Children will be randomly allocated to the 'entirely oral antibiotic' group or the 'standard treatment' group.

This is a phase IIa randomized trial designed to evaluate bacteriophage therapy in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

The incidence of bone and joint infections (BJI) in children (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis and spondylodiscitis) is 22 per 100,000 children in France. Every year, 3,000 children are hospitalized for BJI, 46% of whom are hospitalized for osteomyelitis. The clinical pictures of BJI are varied: some are severe from the outset; others are non-severe, such as BJIs in Kingella kingae, which are most common in children between the ages of 6 months and 5 years. Currently, the management of children's BJI, regardless of their severity, involves initial hospitalization to start intravenous antibiotic therapy. This non-inferiority trial evaluates, in children with acute osteomyelitis with no severity criteria, less invasive outpatient management with an oral antibiotic treatment given at the outset compared to standard management. Main objective : Demonstrate the non-inferiority of an ambulatory management strategy versus a standard strategy involving hospitalization on complete recovery without relapse at 6 months after an episode of acute osteomyelitis in children aged 1-4 years without severity criteria. Primary endpoint: Complete cure without relapse at 6 months defined by the absence of clinical signs of osteomyelitis at 6 months AND the absence of secondary septic complications (septic arthritis, periosteal abscess) before the end of antibiotic therapy AND the absence of relapse or rehospitalization for osteomyelitis related to the initial infection. This criterion will be assessed blindly by an adjudication committee. Randomized controlled trial of non inferiority, with active control, in open multi-center. The control or experimental arm allocation (1:1 ratio) will be open-label of the physician, patient and parents. This is a PROBE study: The evaluation of the main judgment criterion will be carried out blindly by an adjudication committee.

Research question: If adults with bone or joint infection have local antibiotic therapy, can they do without prolonged treatment with antibiotics by mouth (oral) or injection? Adults with bone or joint infections are usually given long courses of oral antibiotics or into a vein (intravenous) following surgery. It is also safe to give antibiotics directly into the bone or joint at the time of surgery: this is called local antibiotic therapy. This study investigates whether using local antibiotic therapy would allow shorter courses of oral or intravenous antibiotics, in order to limit antibiotic resistance, side effects and cost. This study compares short against long courses of oral or intravenous antibiotics for adults who have been given appropriate local antibiotic therapy to treat bone or joint infection. Patients who can take part will be randomly divided into two groups within 7 days of surgery. One group will stop oral or intravenous antibiotics, while the other group will continue for 4 weeks or more (standard treatment). Adults with bone and joint infections who have already had surgery and local antibiotic therapy will be invited. Patients will not take part if they need intravenous antibiotics for another reason, or if their infection is caused by bacteria resistant to the antibiotic(s) used in their local antibiotic therapy. Main measurement: how many patients' infections return within 12 months after surgery. This will be decided by a group of doctors who do not know what treatment the patient received. Other important measurements: serious adverse events; side-effects; quality of life; cost of treatment. Patients will be asked questions at their usual clinic visits, and will be given a questionnaire at the start of treatment and 1 year later.