Active clinical trials for "Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest"

The mortality and neurological outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors have not improved despite the medical advances. The whole body ischemia/reperfusion injuries after cardiac arrest mainly damaged the brain. To improve the neurologic outcome among those patients, additional interventions would be warranted. The investigators hypothesize that the combined use of cortisol, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), and thiamine during the early post-resuscitation period would attenuate the whole-body ischemia/reperfusion injuries among the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors treated with targeted temperature management.

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare prehospital ventilation strategies in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The intervention group is automatic ventilation and the control group is manual ventilation. The main questions it aims to answer are: How does automatic ventilation affect OHCA patients' survival and prognosis comparing to manual ventilation. What are the differences on resuscitation qualities between automatic ventilation and manual ventilation.

The primary aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) as an adjunct treatment to advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) carries a high mortality rate. The treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is ACLS as stated in the guidelines from the Norwegian Resuscitation Council and the European Resuscitation Guidelines. Recently, REBOA has been proposed as an adjunct treatment in management of non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients, because thoracic aortic occlusion provides a redistribution of the cardiac output to organs proximal to the occlusion. Preclinical studies demonstrate that REBOA during CPR provide both increased coronary artery blood flow and perfusion pressure and increased rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). This is the first prospective trial in the world to assess the efficacy of REBOA in non-traumatic cardiac arrest. The intervention is shown feasible in the pre-hospital setting. If this trial provides a signal of benefit in patients, this study could initiate further clinical research which could change current resuscitation practice world-wide.

Unexpected cardiac arrest is a frequent and devastating event with a high mortality and morbidity. Half of the patients who survive to ICU admission ultimately die because of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. With CPR and advanced life support, blood and oxygen delivery to heart and brain is preserved until circulation is restored. During CPR, coronary perfusion pressure is a significant predictor of increased rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to hospital discharge, while cerebral perfusion pressure is crucial for good neurologic outcome. Existing efforts to reduce mortality and morbidity focus on rapid recognition of cardiac arrest, initiation of basic and advanced life support (ALS), and optimization of post-arrest care. Clamping the descending aorta during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) should redistribute the blood flow towards brain and heart. Animal models of continuous balloon occlusion of the aorta in non-traumatic cardiac arrest have shown meaningful increases in coronary artery blood flow, coronary artery perfusion pressure and carotid blood flow, leading to improved rates of ROSC, 48h-survival and neurological function. In humans, occlusion of the aorta using a REBOA catheter in the management of non-compressible abdominal or pelvic hemorrhage has shown improvements in hemodynamic profiles and has proved to be feasible in both, clinical and preclinical settings for trauma patients in hemorrhagic shock. These promising data provide an opportunity to improve outcome after cardiac arrest in humans too. The investigators have developed a protocol for the reliable and safe placement of a REBOA-catheter during cardiac arrest in a clinical setting (see ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03664557). Damage to heart and brain from lack of oxygen supply occurs during the first minutes following cardiac arrest. It is therefore crucial to apply any measure to improve efficacy of CPR early in the course of events and therapy. After proving feasibility in a clinical setting in the trial mentioned above, the next logical step and specific goal of this study is to transfer this protocol to the preclinical setting, and to investigate the effect of temporary endovascular occlusion of the descending aorta on the efficacy of CPR early in the course of treatment of out-of hospital cardiac arrest by means of an increase in blood pressure.

This study investigates the efficacy of landiolol versus placebo in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and refractory ventricular fibrillation (electrical storm).

In patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac arrest who achieves Return Of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) The investigators want to evaluate whether there is a benefit from acute Angiography compared to subacute (12-24 hours) Angiography

The study will assess 30-day survival for cases where volunteer citizen responders ('heart runners') were activated through a smartphone app to retrieve an AED in case of suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) versus standard emergency medical services care. The study will randomize emergency medical dispatch center incoming calls which are suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, such that half will be randomized to activation of heart runners and half to no activation of heart runners (standard care). The study will also assess physical or psychological risks involved for the activated heart runners.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of a low cumulative dose of epinephrine compared to a standard cumulative dose of epinephrine during resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients.

Background: For patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at the intensive care unit (ICU), oxygen therapy plays an important role in post resuscitation care. During hospitalisation, a lot of these patients occur with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Currently a wide oxygen target is recommended but no evidence regarding optimal treatment targets to minimise the prevalence of PAH exists. Methods: The RELIEPH trial is a substudy within the BOX (Blood pressure and OXygenation targets in post resuscitation care) trial. It is a single-center, parallel-group randomised controlled clinical trial. 300 patients with OHCA hospitalised at the ICU are allocated to one of the two oxygenation interventions, either a restrictive- (9-10 kPa) or liberal (13-14 kPa) oxygen target both within the recommended range. The primary outcome is the fraction of time with pulmonary hypertension (mPAP >25 mmHg) out of total time with mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes are: length of ICU stay among survivors, lactate clearance, right ventricular failure, 30 days mortality and plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level 48 hours from randomisation. Discussion: This study hypothesises that a liberal target of oxygen reduces the time with PAH during mechanical ventilation compared to a restrictive oxygen target in patients with OHCA at the ICU. When completed, this study hopes to provide new knowledge regarding which oxygen target is beneficial for this group of patients.

The study aims to increase proportions of bystander defibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (hereof referred to as cardiac arrest) in residential areas with a high density of cardiac arrests. The intervention consists of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) and residents' involvement in resuscitation through training and enrollment as citizen responders.