Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial"

There are more and more PARPi(PARP inhibitors) resistance for ovarian cancer patients after previous use of PARP inhibitors. Basic studies have found that there is synergistic effect of bevacizumab combined with PARPi. Therefore we designed the study to include 42 ovarian cancer patients who had PARPi for at least half a year and then relapsed (platinum-sensitive, previously 1-3 lines of chemotherapy). After getting complete remission or partial remission with chemotherapy containing platinum and bevacizumab, fluzopanib and bevacizumab were used for maintenance treatment. The progression-free survival, ORR, DCR, DoR, and safety were evaluated based on RECIST V1.1.

This is an open label Phase 1b/2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ACR-368 as monotherapy or in combination with ultralow dose gemcitabine in participants with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, and urothelial carcinoma based on Acrivon's OncoSignature® test status.

This is an Italian, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III trial which will evaluate if Letrozole is superior to standard adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with hormone receptor positive low-grade serous epithelial carcinoma of the ovary (LGSCO). The hypothesis is that letrozole will significantly prolong median progression free survival (PFS) compared with the standard chemotherapy treatment, namely carboplatin AUC 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous (IV) administration of XmAb808 in combination with pembrolizumab in subjects with selected advanced solid tumors and to identify the minimum safe and biologically effective/recommended dose (RD) and schedule for XmAb808.

The purpose of this research study is to see how useful it is to look at biomarkers in the blood and tumor tissue of participants with ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who have previously received treatment with a drug called a PARP inhibitor, and using the results to determine the best treatment for these participants. Biomarkers are molecules such as genes (molecules that contain instructions for the development and function of cells in the body) and proteins that may be used to see how well a body responds to certain treatments.

This is a single arm phase 1b/2 evaluation of the combination of oregovomab, and bevacizumab, paclitaxel carboplatin in adult subjects with CA125-associated, advanced recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal carcinoma (FIGO Stage III/IV) with BRCA-wild type, previously treated with 1 prior lines of therapy, and with platinum free intervals of >6 months since last platinum-based treatment.

Study LCB-1801-001 is an open-label, Phase 1, dose escalation (Part A) and expansion (Part B), first-in-human clinical study of NI-1801 in subjects with advanced, metastatic, or recurrent solid malignancies expressing mesothelin (MSLN). The dose escalation part (Part A) of the study will evaluate the safety and tolerability of escalating doses of NI-1801, administered intravenously (IV) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and non-tolerated toxic dose (NTD) of both the first dose and subsequent doses of NI-1801. The expansion part (Part B) will further evaluate the safety and efficacy of NI-1801 administered at or below the MTD in up to 20 subjects in order to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Treatments will be administered in 28-day cycles for up to 6 months until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or subject/Investigator decision to withdraw. NI-1801 treatment can extend beyond 6 cycles for those patients who do not have disease progression.

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used in current clinical practice in selected patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Clinical evidence for the benefit of HIPEC in ovarian cancer comes from the pivotal phase 3 OVHIPEC trial. Worldwide, two established strategies exist for dosing of HIPEC protocols, which follow either a body surface area (BSA)-based or a concentration-based approach. Since both strategies result in different exposure to intra-peritoneal chemotherapy, we aim to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of both strategies.

This phase I trial studies the side effects of hyperthermic intraepithelial chemotherapy with cisplatin after surgery or cisplatin before surgery in treating patients with stage III or IV ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer receiving chemotherapy before surgery. Hyperthermic intraepithelial chemotherapy involves the infusion of heated cytotoxic chemotherapy that circulates into the abdominal cavity at the time of surgery. Chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving hyperthermic intraepithelial chemotherapy with cisplatin after surgery or cisplatin before surgery may kill more tumor cells compared to usual care.

Rationale Ovarian cancer is the 3rd most common gynecologic malignancy in Korea. The standard treatment is tumor debulking surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. However, with a recurrence rate of 80%, the treatment results are the worst among gynecological cancers. The use of target and immune agents have demonstrated to improve survival. However, long-term maintenance of systemic therapy is often difficult because recurrent tumors do not respond uniformly to systemic therapy. In the 1980~1990s, whole abdomen irradiation had been tried and faded out owing to many side effects with the introduction of taxane. Efforts have been made to find the role of salvage radiation therapy (RT) in recurrent ovarian cancer. Involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) emerged to cover the gross tumor plus regional microscopic disease in addition to salvage chemotherapy. It showed high local control, provided chemotherapy holiday in selected cases, but did not prevent out-field progression. Stereotactic ABlative Radiotherapy (SABR) is the latest treatment using an intensity modulated technique to increase the fractional dose, reduces the number of treatments, and destroys the tumor with high accuracy. SABR-COMET study, a representative clinical study, showed a significant increase in overall survival in solid cancers. Objectives The primary objective; to evaluate whether the addition of SABR to standard salvage treatment significantly improves 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. The secondary objectives; to check whether it significantly affects quality of life (Health-related QoL), patient-reported outcome (PRO) to develop an deep learning-based predictive model for the treatment response of ovarian cancer subjects using radiomic and genomic analysis. Study design Arm 1; Standard salvage therapy Subjects will continue to receive current salvage treatment suitable for subjects at the discretion of their doctor, considering the location and size of recurrence, and the patient's comorbidities. Arm 2; Standard salvage therapy+ SABR Subjects receive SABR for lesions found in imaging studies. Before or After SABR, standard salvage treatment continues as planned at the discretion of the doctor. Stratification factors The number of No ascites, Platinum-sensitive, Normal CA125 and ECOG０-１; 0~3 vs. 4 Location of the lesion; Lymph node lesion vs. Non-lymph node lesion PARP inhibitor; Used vs. Not used Randomization Arm 1 : Arm 2 = 1 : 2 Estimated Accrual : The sample size 270 was calculated by setting the sample size to a Type I error rate (α) of 0.05 and Statistical Power of 80% using 2-Sided Equity and log-rank test. Accurate time: 2 years, Follow-up: 3 years (total 5 years) Alpha = 0.05, Power = 80% 1 year drop-out: 5% per group 3 year survival proportion: RT group 74.42%, No RT group 58% Arm 1: Arm 2 = 1 : 2 ratio