Active clinical trials for "Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome"

Study the effect of early cabergoline administration in prevention of occurrence or decreasing the severity of OHSS in patients undergoing intra cytoplasmic sperm injection.And its effect on oocyte maturation,fertilization and pregnancy rate..

Ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially serious complication of ovarian stimulation in IVF (In Vitro Fertilisation). The main objective of this study is to describe the incidence of moderate or severe forms of OHSS in women between 18 and 36 years of age treated with HP-hMG.

The possibility to prevent the early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by doubling the daily dose of GnRH-antagonist in women stimulated with the antagonist protocol who are at risk for OHSS was evaluated. Thirty-eight women of a study group who underwent ovarian stimulation using the GnRH-antagonist protocol and might have had their cycle cancelled because of OHSS were compared to 76 women of a control group. All cases of the study group were IVF women presenting a rapid rise of E2 ≥ 3500 pg/ml on the 7th day of stimulation or later while the follicles (> 12mm) were > 15 in total and the biggest one was ≤ 16mm in diameter. By decreasing the rFSH dose to 100IU a day and adding an additional dose of GnRH-antagonist (0.25 twice a day), estradiol levels were lowered or reached a plateau before hCG was given. A marked decrease or plateau of estradiol levels was observed the day of oocyte retrieval while the pregnancy rate was not adversely affected when compared with an optimum ovarian response cycles. None of the women were cancelled or developed OHSS. In overresponding IVF cycles, doubling the usual GnRH-antagonist daily-dose during the ovarian stimulation, the estradiol rise could be blocked while a minimal follicular stimulation may continue without the risk of OHSS or adversely affect pregnancy rate.

The purpose of this study is to compare pregnancy rates and the occurrence of OHSS in PCOS patients who were treated with GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols ovarian stimulation during an IVF cycle. Our hypothesis is that the GnRH antagonist protocol reduces the occurrence and severity of OHSS compared to the GnRH agonist protocol.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is an iatrogenic complication of controlled ovarian stimulation. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention is a multistage process and more important than treatment.Preventive administration of GnRH antagonist for high risk OHSS patients from the day of oocyte retrieval is not investigated. Besides, the relevant mechanism is not clear yet. Here we designed a prospective randomized study to investigate whether GnRH anatagonist treatment after oocyte retrieval is more effective in preventing early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome development than traditional aspirin preventive administration in women at high risk for OHSS.

This study aims at evaluating clincal practice regarding prevention of arterial and venous thrombosis following ovarian stimulation. Secondary outcomes are : 1) to describe the incidence and risk factors of arterial and venous thrombosis in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology and 2)to identify the incidence and risk factors for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in these women

The purpose of this study is to compare two different strategies to implement the existing Guideline programme on Subfertility, as issued by the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG). Therefore, an innovative patient-directed strategy will be compared to a control strategy and effectiveness, costs and feasibility of both strategies will be assessed.

The purpose of this study is to prove that luteal phase supplementation with recombinant LH can solve the luteal phase deficiency after Gnrh agonist oocytes triggering in women at risk of OHSS

Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist is sufficient for triggering final oocyte maturation in GnRH antagonist protocol and can significantly reduce incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high-risk patients. However, lower oocyte yield was reported in patients with lower luteinizing hormone (LH) level post trigger with single injection of GnRH agonist, which might be related to the shorter duration and lower amount of LH induced by GnRH agonist. Our aim is to study dual trigger with GnRH agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for preventing OHSS and maintaining clinical outcome in high risk patients who receive controlled ovarian stimulation in GnRH antagonist protocol.

Nowadays, frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FET) are expending. This practice avoids risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), as well as allowing better synchronization between endometrium and embryo, which is fundamental for pregnancy. There are several FET protocols, including hormonal replacement therapy cycle (HRT), which enable clinicians to adapt the day of embryo transfer. However, increase in spontaneous miscarriages was observed with this latter protocol compared to fresh embryo transfers and the other endometrial preparations (natural and stimulated), in relation with the lack of physiological corpus luteum. Then, Clinicians interrogate about measuring serum progesterone in order to adjust their treatment and/or transfer date. Various studies have shown thresholds below and/or above which pregnancy or live birth rate were lowered. The main objective is to find a serum progesterone threshold on the day of embryo transfer above which live birth rate is increased. The secondary objectives are to analyze the factors associated with increased serum progesterone on the day of transfer, to analyze the miscarriage rate, and impact of change on luteal phase support on day 12.