search

Active clinical trials for "Overbite"

Results 51-60 of 85

Effect of Skeletally Anchored Herbst Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Due to Mandibular...

MalocclusionAngle Class II

Ten adolescent female patients with Class 2 mandibular deficiency with a mean age of 16.5 ±1.71 years treated with type IV Herbst appliance. Skeletally anchored appliance was connected directly to the mandible by a bilateral reconstruction bone plates to provide a skeletal anchorage, while connected to the maxilla through dental splint connecting upper canine, first premolar, first and second molars through the use of orthodontic bands connected together palatally by a heavy 1mm stainless steel wire. The treatment duration was 9 months, then the appliances were removed,The Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans were taken before and immediately after Herbst treatment to analyse airway volume, also 3D measurement of the effective mandibular length has been taken. Cephalometric film was extracted from CBCT scans and analysed for dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Therapeutic Effects of Class II Elastics on Aligners.

MalocclusionAngle Class II

The objective is to compare the dento-alveolar therapeutic effects of wearing class II inter-arch traction elastics on aligners versus multi-brackets in an adult population. The principal hypothesis is no significant difference in therapeutic effects of using inter-arch elastics on aligners versus multi-brackets.

Not yet recruiting8 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Root Resorption During the Correction of Deep Bite With the Help of Laser Irradiation...

Deep Overbite

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of low-level laser in reducing the resorption of the roots of the upper incisors. Participants will be recruited from patients who will attend the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics at Damascus University. The study sample will consist of 30 patients with a deep bite who will be randomly distributed equally into two groups, 15 patients in each group, average age: 22.37±3.38 years. Mini-implants will apply between the roots of the maxillary central and lateral incisor at both sides with a loading force of 40 g on each end by using a nickel-titanium spring extending from the head of the mini-implants to a wire welded to it with two hooks. A low-level laser (Ga-Al-As) will be used with 808 nm wavelength in continuous mode, 250 milli-Watt power output, 4 Joules/point energy density, 16 s per point in the experimental group. It will be applied on the day of intrusion, then on days 3,7, and 14 of the first month, and then every 15 days starting from the second month until the end of the intrusion. In addition to adjusting the force gauge every 4 weeks until the end of the intrusion stage and reaching normal coverage will be activated every 4 weeks in both groups until normal overbite was reached.

Completed10 enrollment criteria

the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored...

Class II Malocclusion

This study will be directed to evaluate The effect of two different types of fixed functional appliances on the temporomandibular joint. Study design: Prospective randomized clinical study. Study setting and population: This study will be conducted on twenty orthodontic patients. The number of patients was dependent on a power study. Sample size calculation was based on the observed average effect size derived from previous article addressing "the effect of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD using miniplates for the treatment of Class II malocclusion

Completed9 enrollment criteria

Dentoskeletal Effects of Two Different Fixed Functional Appliances for Correction of Class II Malocclusion:...

Class II Malocclusion

Fixed Functional Appliances comparisons in treatment of orthodontic class II malocclusion cases

Completed10 enrollment criteria

Vertical Effects in Class II Patients Treated With Distalization

MalocclusionAngle Class II

Class II malocclusion presents a major and common challenge to orthodontists. Treatment of Class II malocclusion is one of the most investigated and controversial issues in contemporary orthodontics because of the extensive variability of treatment strategies addressing the morphological characteristics of this malocclusion. The therapeutic approaches include tooth extractions, orthopedic appliances and extraoral or intraoral distalizing appliances. Maxillary molar distalization is one of the most common strategies to correct Class II molar relationship and it is commonly indicated for patients with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion or minor skeletal discrepancies. One of the most used devices is Pendulum appliance, introducted by Hilgers in 1992. In the last decades, the orthodontic treatment with removable clear aligners has become an increasing common choice because of the growing number of adult patients who ask for aesthetic and comfortable alternatives to conventional fixed appliances. In 1997, Align Technology (Santa Clara, Calif) adapted and incorporated modern technologies to introduce the clear aligner treatment (CAT). Only few investigations have focused on the predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with CAT. A systematic review by Rossini et al. pointed out that among the dental movements analyzed in 11 studies, the bodily distalization was the most predictable. Clinicians can consider the use of aligners in treatment planning for adult patients requiring 2 to 3 mm of maxillary molar distalization. However, a detailed analysis of the skeletal and dental changes that compared pendulum appliance and clear aligners in class II treatment is still lacking. On the basis of these considerations, the aim of the present prospective study was to analyze the effects on vertical dentoskeletal changes following maxillary molar distalization with pendulum and full fixed appliances and clear aligners.

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Accelerating Orthodontic Treatment

MalocclusionAngle Class II

Thirty six patients needs therapeutic extraction of the maxillary first premolars with subsequent retraction of the maxillary canines will be divided randomly into two groups : piezocision group and the ER:yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser group. In each group, piezocision or hard laser-assisted flapless corticotomy will randomly assigned to one side of the maxillary arch at the first premolar region, and the other side served as the control. Canine retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side, soldered trans-palatal arch will be used as an anchor unit. Pre- and post distalization dental casts will be evaluated to study rate of canine distalization, canine rotation and anchorage loss over a follow-up period until a Class I canine relationship is achieved. The levels of pain and discomfort will be self-reported using a questionnaire with visual analog scales administered at four assessment times during the first month after the minimally invasive procedure.

Completed23 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Mini Plates Anchorage With Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device

MalocclusionAngle Class II1 more

The purpose of this study is to determine if the Forsus Fatigue resistant Device appliance with direct skeletal mini plates anchorage is capable of achievement of skeletal mandibular effects while preventing the excessive proclination of the lower incisors at the end of the treatment when compared to the conventional Forsus Fatigue resistant Device appliance applied to the upper and lower dental arches in female patients with skeletal Class II malocclusion

Completed11 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement and...

Class II Malocclusion

Thirty-eight patients requiring extraction of maxillary first premolars and maximum anchorage to retract the upper anterior teeth will participate in the study. They will be divided randomly into two groups: electrical group and control group. In each group, en-masse retraction will be initiated after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side, Mini-implants will be used as an anchor unit. The dental changes will be detected using dental casts and to evaluate the rate of teeth retraction.

Completed22 enrollment criteria

Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement

Class II Malocclusion

Sixty patients need extraction-based treatment of the maxillary first premolars with subsequent retraction of the maxillary canines will be divided randomly into three groups: piezocision group, low-level laser therapy group, and control group. In each group, the canine retraction will be started after completion of the leveling and alignment phase via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 150 g of force per side. For anchorage, a soldered trans-palatal arch will be used. Pre- and post distalization dental casts will be assessed to study the rate of canine retraction, as well as, canine rotation and anchorage loss over a follow-up period until a class I canine relationship is achieved.

Completed22 enrollment criteria
1...567...9

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs