Active clinical trials for "Pain"

Narrative medicine addresses the therapeutic benefits that derive from patients forming and telling their personal stories. It offers an innovative model for improving health outcomes. When a patient with cancer and marked suffering writes a narrative of what he or she is going through, this process may reduce pain and improve quality of life. Therefore, we seek to evaluate the effectiveness of writing a narrative on pain intensity and health related quality of life. We propose a randomized single blind (evaluator) controlled trial. Patients with cancer pain of intensity at least 5/10 with a minimum Karnofsky score of 50% will be randomized into three groups: 1. Narrative group. Patients will write a story about their illness for at least 20 minutes once a week for 3 weeks; 2. Writing-control group. Patients will fill a pain diary once a week for three weeks; 3. Control group. Subjects will not write/fill anything. Pain will be evaluated using the numerical scale before randomization and then weekly for 8 weeks. We will also evaluate how pain interferes with general activity, mood, work, relation with others, sleep, and enjoyment of life using the Brief Pain Inventory. As secondary outcomes, we will evaluate health related quality of life, with the treatment outcomes of pain survey, which is a modification of the SF 36 (short form health survey), and a global measure of well-being before randomization, and then at 4 and 8 weeks. We will also evaluate the emotional disclosure of the narratives. We will use an intention to treat analysis. To analyze the effect of the treatment on pain intensity, quality of life, and well-being, we will employ an analysis of repeated measures using generalized estimating equations. We will include in the regression models the treatment group, the emotional disclosure score, the time, and the interaction between treatment group and time.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect on QoL, PI and the AROM° in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. This after following an episode of 6 weeks 2 times a week physiotherapeutic back rehabilitation according to the 4 times T method by orthopedic disorder ® (4MTOR®). The results in this research will be analyzed and reported. In this study, 7 dependent variables will be independently examined relative to 2 independent variables.

This is a study investigating the effect of MEDI7352 on chronic pain in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. The study incudes a screening period of up to 45 days and a 12-week treatment period during which MEDI7352 or placebo will be administered intravenously (IV) on 6 occasions, with each dose separated by 14 days. There will be a 6-week follow-up period. Subjects will randomly be assigned to double-blind treatment with one of 4 dose levels of MEDI7352 or placebo

Will participants with painful lower extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) that are treated with high frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF10 SCS) have improvements in lower extremity peripheral nerve function?

This study is a prospective, single-arm, open label, single center to confirm the effectiveness and safety of an ultra-high frequency (500 KHz) spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic back pain or lower limb pain.

A Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Multiple Doses of MT-8554 in Subjects with Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Neck pain is becoming increasingly common throughout the world with a considerable impact on individuals, communities, health-care systems and businesses (Hoy et al, 2011).Neck pain is a common problem within our society affecting individual's physical and social functioning considerably and interfering with the patient's daily activities. There is lack of evidence to allow conclusions to be drawn about the effectiveness of MET when compared with stretching exercises for relieving mechanical neck pain. Therefore, this study is designed to examine the effect of MET, static stretching and to compare their effects on pain intensity and functional disability in patient with mechanical neck pain.

The aim of this study is to characterize the distribution of pain phenotypes in people with chronic low back pain and to determine the effects of pain phenotypes on pain severity, functional status and quality of life. Participants will be examined to determine the type of pain and questions will be asked to identify the effects.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and standardized procedure. Postoperative mortality after hip joint replacement is low but some complications remain, including chronic post-surgical pain (1), hip dislocation (2), infection (3), and deep vein thrombosis (4). Strategies that have been identified to reduce morbidity and mortality include: posterior surgical approach, mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, and the use of spinal anesthesia (5). One of the important factors for patient satisfaction with lower limb arthroplasty is good postoperative pain management (6). Poorly managed postoperative pain can lead to chronic post-surgical pain and therefore aggressive postoperative pain management is important (7). Several different methods have been used to treat postoperative pain following THA. Recently, local infiltration analgesia (LIA) using a combination of large volume local anesthetics (LA) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAID) injected systematically peri-articularly has been used for pain management with variable success (8). We found that better analgesia could be achieved when using LIA compared to intrathecal morphine during the first few days postoperatively (9,10). Ultrasound techniques are commonly used for peripheral nerve blocks and have been shown to reduce pain intensity and may be considered by many to be a standard of care. Specifically, the 3-in-1 block has been commonly used because of its ease of application and good pain management following total hip arthroplasty. The present study aims to compare postoperative pain intensity following local infiltration analgesia with a standardised 3-in-1 block for total hip arthroplasty.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a range of single intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses of BG00010 in healthy volunteers, and a range of multiple SC doses of BG00010 in participants with painful lumbar radiculopathy. Secondary objectives of this study are to determine the single IV and SC dose pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of BG00010 in healthy volunteers including assessment of bioavailability by comparing SC exposure to IV exposure in each participant, to determine the multiple SC dose PK profiles of BG00010 in participants with painful lumbar radiculopathy, to assess the single IV and SC dose immunogenicity of BG00010 in healthy volunteers, to assess the multiple SC dose immunogenicity of BG00010 in participants with painful lumbar radiculopathy, and to assess the potential of BG00010 to reduce pain following multiple SC administrations in participants with painful lumbar radiculopathy.