search

Active clinical trials for "Pancreatic Neoplasms"

Results 2071-2080 of 2501

Aroplatin and Gemcitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Resistant to Standard Therapies...

Pancreatic Neoplasms

This study is a Phase I/II study. In Phase I of this study, the objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combination therapy with Aroplatin and gemcitabine (Gemzar®) in subjects with unresectable, locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In Phase II, the primary objective is to evaluate survival after therapy with Aroplatin and gemcitabine at the identified MTD in subjects with unresectable, locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the severity and quantity of adverse events and determine the proportion of non-progressors and the progression-free interval.

Unknown status17 enrollment criteria

Gemcitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic...

Pancreatic Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without oxaliplatin in treating pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and oxaliplatin to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine alone in treating patients with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Unknown status47 enrollment criteria

BBR 3464 in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Cannot...

Pancreatic Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of BBR 3464 in treating patients who have locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer that cannot be treated with surgery.

Unknown status3 enrollment criteria

Fluorouracil Plus Radiation Therapy Following Surgery in Treating Patients With Pancreatic Cancer...

Pancreatic Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Combining chemotherapy with radiation therapy may kill more tumor cells left after surgery. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of combining fluorouracil and radiation therapy in treating patients who have undergone surgery for pancreatic cancer.

Unknown status40 enrollment criteria

Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy in BEY1107 in Monotherapy Gemcitabine Combination in Patient With...

Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

This study is a single center, open-label, non-comparative, phase I/II clinical trial to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and efficacy of BEY1107 in monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine in patient With locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Unknown status13 enrollment criteria

QUILT-3.080: NANT Pancreatic Cancer Vaccine

Pancreatic Cancer

This is a phase 1b/2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of metronomic combination therapy in subjects with pancreatic cancer who have progressed on or after previous Standard of Care (SoC) chemotherapy.

Unknown status36 enrollment criteria

MFOLFIRINOX And Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Pancreatic Cancer With High Risk and Locally...

Pancreatic Cancer

This is a prospective, multicentre randomised, phase II clinical trial, with randomisation 2:1 by minimisation and stratification by tumour stage, planned chemotherapy and institution.

Unknown status22 enrollment criteria

Etoposide/Cisplatin Compared With Irinotecan/Cisplatin for Advanced Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine...

Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of etoposide plus cisplatin and irinotecan plus cisplatin in first-line therapy of non-primary pancreatic metastatic and/or unresectable gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor G3 type. In addition, the investigators will explore the resistance mechanisms of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor G3, and screen out biomarkers that can predict the efficacy of chemotherapy.

Unknown status32 enrollment criteria

Self-expandable Metal Stents Versus Multiple Plastic Stents for Palliation of Biliary Obstruction...

Bile Duct ObstructionExtrahepatic3 more

A randomised clinical trial to compare the clinical efficacy of multiple plastic stents to fully covered self expanding metal stents in the palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction in patients with irresectable tumours.

Unknown status18 enrollment criteria

Greater Omentum Binding to the Pancreatic Stump to Prevent Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy...

Pancreatic FistulaPancreatic Neoplasms

Background and aim: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is often performed for primary benign or malignant lesions occurred in the body or tail of the pancreas. The occurrence of pancreatic fistula (PF) after DP remains high, ranging from 5% to 60%, despite in high-volume centers. Management of pancreatic stump to prevent PF has been a long-standing issue in pancreatic surgery. Our group has proposed greater omentum binding as a novel approach to secure pancreatic stump with the purpose of reducing PF. With respect to the previous preliminary data which demonstrated greater omentum binding of pancreatic stump significantly reduced the occurrence of PF based on a small prospective cohort, we therefore aimed to verify the safety and effectiveness of this novel approach in a large prospective randomized cohort. Method: TJBDPS06 is a prospective, randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial in a single high-volume pancreatic center. A total of 200 patients who will receive DP and fulfill the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to the greater omentum binding group or the group without this step in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) setting. The trial hypothesize that greater omentum binding of pancreatic stump could safely and effectively secure pancreatic stump following DP, therefore reducing the occurrence of PF. The primary outcome is PF within 90 days after DP. The secondary outcomes are overall morbidly, mortality, and major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) within 90 days following DP. The duration of entire trial is presumably three years, including prearrangement, two-year inclusion period, and data analysis. Discussion: The current trial will be the first in demonstrating safety and effectiveness of greater omentum binding of pancreatic stump following DP in a large high-volume pancreatic center. This approach will offer an inexpensive, technically easy, and secure coverage technique for the pancreatic stump in DP and may be particularly useful for patients with a soft pancreas which is a markedly risk factor of PF.

Unknown status9 enrollment criteria
1...207208209...251

Need Help? Contact our team!


We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs