Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a common intervention in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The presence of new postoperative atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter (POAF) occurs in 15-40% of patients undergoing this procedure, with a high rate of complications, including increased hospital length of stay, with a consequent increase in the costs. In addition, the presence of POAF increases the rate of thromboembolic events such as stroke and mortality in the short and long term. Anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF) lato sensu is already a well-established therapy in patients at high risk, defined by CHADS-VASC greater than or equal to 2. The use of direct-acting anticoagulants (DOACS) is standard therapy for those patients. In the POAF scenario, there is a recommendation for anticoagulation in high-risk patients for at least 30 days, however, despite being an entity with a poor prognosis in the short and long term, it is an undertreated entity. At present, there is no evidence of anticoagulant treatment of POAF with DOACS, and warfarin is the standard therapy. Warfarin is a drug that needs laboratory control of prothrombin time (PT) and anticoagulation bridge with other anticoagulants, usually using heparin and enoxaparin. We believe that because warfarin is the standard drug in this scenario, it is not prescribed on a regular basis, since it increases costs, length of hospital stay and is less effective than DOACS in AF lato sensu. Thus, the research project intends to compare the cost-effectiveness, assessed by QALY, related to the warfarin prescription strategy associated with bridge anticoagulation versus the rivaroxaban prescription in patients who presented POAF with a minimum duration of 12 hours or AF that requires intervention. Medications will be started during hospitalization. After randomization, anticoagulant medication will be started within 24 hours. The patient will be reassessed in 30 days and if there is no evidence of maintenance of AF, the anticoagulant medication will be discontinued and the standard treatment for CAD will be maintained. Secondary outcomes will be: clinical outcomes, such as: (1) Death; (2) stroke; (3) myocardial infarction (MI); (4) Readmission; (5) Systemic embolization; (6); Surgical reintervention; (6) Bleeding using the ISTH score; (7) Infection. The safety outcome will be the bleeding assessment according to the bleeding score of the ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis). Considering that POAF is a prevalent entity and associated with a worse prognosis in the short and long term, as well as despite recommendations for guidelines to keep these patients anticoagulated, it is noted that the prescription of anticoagulation at hospital discharge is low. Considering that there is no clear evidence in studies on the use of DOAC in this population, we understand that the search for medications that lead to better cost-benefit, as well as better dosage and bleeding rates not lower than the use of warfarin, could lead to a higher rate prescribing anticoagulants for these patients, reducing costs, clinical and mortality outcomes.

This is a prospective study to evaluate changes in exercise capacity and chronotropic response to exercise before and after beta-blocker dosage reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Postoperative atrial fibrillation is a major complication of cardiac surgery, which could lead to high morbidity and mortality, increase duration of hospital stay and increase the cost of treatment. New-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery is considered as a multifactorial phenomenon. Amiodarone, the most commonly used drug for cardioversion, is limited in atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery due to side effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, and extracardiac side effects. Nifekalant is a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent with short onset time. It is a pure potassium channel blocker, which generally does not cause hypotension and bradycardia. There have been several trials that proven efficacy of nifekalant in converting persistent atrial fibrillation. For atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery, the effectiveness and safety of nifekalant compared to amiodarone have not yet been reported. The investigators plan to perform a clinical trial comparing nifekalant to amiodarone in new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery patients with a primary outcome of cardioversion at 4 hours. Secondary outcomes will follow cardioversion at 90 minutes and 24 hours, maintenance time of sinus rhythm within 24 hours, average time to conversion to sinus rhythm, rate of hypotension, length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay and hospital mortality.

While there are several completed clinical trials that address treatment strategy in patients with symptomatic and recurrent AF, there are no randomized clinical trials that address treatment for first-detected AF. In usual care, these patients are started on an atrioventricular nodal blocking agent (beta-blocker or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker) along with stroke prevention therapy. The investigators hypothesize that earlier administration of a well-tolerated antiarrhythmic drug proven to reduce hospitalization may result in improved cardiovascular outcomes and quality of life in patients first-detected AF. The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with dronedarone on top of usual care is superior to usual care alone for the prevention of cardiovascular hospitalization or death from any cause in patients hospitalized with first-detected AF. All patients will be treated with guideline-recommended stroke prevention therapy according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score. The treatment follow-up period will be 12 months. There will be two follow-up visits. Consistent with the pragmatic nature of the trial, the first follow-up will occur between 3 -9 months and the 2nd will occur at 12 months (with a window of +/- 30 days). Approximately 3000 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to study intervention. The study intervention will be dronedarone 400 mg twice daily in addition to usual care versus usual care alone.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients suffer a high symptom burden and reduced quality of life (QoL), high hospitalization rates and few effective treatment options. They have a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors and events. Lifestyle changes and exercise is a cornerstone of management in most chronic cardiac conditions and holds promise in AF, but the evidence is sparse and specific guidelines for exercise do not exist for AF patients. NEXAF is a large-scale multicenter randomized trial to determine the feasibility and effects of exercise on patient-reported and clinical outcomes. All patients will undergo continuous rhythm monitoring, enabling assessment of duration, frequency and total time of AF episodes. The overall aim of the study is to provide documentation for clinical exercise recommendations in AF. The objectives are to examine the effects of a 1-year exercise intervention in AF patients on (i) QoL and symptom burden, (ii) time-in-AF, and peak oxygen uptake, cardiac structure and function, cardiovascular risk factors and use of healthcare resources.

A multicentre, parallel group, two arm, single-blinded randomized clinical trial, assessing the efficacy of a patient-tailored catheter ablation (CA) strategy guided by atrial scar mapping in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) when compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

Non-valvular (NV) atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of stroke by approximately fivefold. The atrial thrombi associated with AF are seen within the left atrial appendage (LAA) in most cases (> 90%). Anticoagulation with a vitamin-K antagonist (VKA) is recommended to prevent thromboembolic complications and to resolve thrombi. Non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have replaced the VKA for the thromboprophylaxis in patients with NVAF since 2010. Therefore, NOAC can be the excellent alternative to VKA concerning resolving preexisting LAA thrombi because of its rapid onset of action and no need of bridging with heparin. However, there is still lack of data regarding the optimal treatment for patients with AF and thrombi in LAA with NOAC. There are only several case reports of the efficacy of NOACs in resolving LAA thrombi available. Edoxaban, which has data showing efficacy and safety in thromboprophylaxis, can be the new option for treatment of patients with AF and LAA thrombi. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Edoxaban in resolving the LAA thrombi, which is related with nonvalvular AF.

The aim of this project is to determine whether the entire intervention (Mindfulness meditation, AF education, and weekly phone visits) that is nurse delivered to individuals with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is more effective than a combination, single or no intervention in the reduction of overall AF symptoms, anxiety, and negative illness perception; or the improvement of quality of life (QOL) and functional status.

Currently, the usual initial strategy for direct current cardioversion (DCCV) typically involves delivering 200J of electricity between two pads placed in the anterior and posterior positions (i.e., one on the chest and one on the back). However, this technique may be less likely to result in successful cardioversion in obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Failure to achieve sinus rhythm then necessitates additional shocks, which still may ultimately fail to terminate the patient's atrial fibrillation, thereby increasing the likelihood of adverse events from multiple cardioversion attempts "Dual-DCCV" is a technique in which four pads are used to deliver two simultaneous shocks of 200J, totaling 400J. Guidelines published by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society and the European Society of Cardiology provide only general guidance regarding the appropriate technique and energy selection in patients undergoing cardioversion, with no specific recommendations pertaining to dual-DCCV or obese patients. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of dual-DCCV as an initial treatment strategy, compared to standard single-DCCV, in the obese population.

WATCH-TMVR (Watchman for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Transcatheter Mitral Valve) Clinical Trial have the main objective to assess the feasibility of combining clinically indicated MitraClip TMVR and Watchman LAAO in one setting.Mayo Clinic will be the data coordinating center for this trial, which will include up to 3 sites.