Active clinical trials for "Pelvic Organ Prolapse"

To determine the effect of post-operative abdominal binder usage on total narcotic usage after undergoing surgery. To determine if abdominal binder usage results in decreased visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and shorter time to first ambulation post operatively.

The aim of this study is to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Elevate® Apical and Posterior Prolapse Repair System for repair of apical/posterior pelvic organ prolapse in a controlled, post-market cohort study.

The International Continence Society defines post-hysterectomy vault prolapse (PHVP) as descent of the vaginal cuff scar below a point that is 2 cm less than the total vaginal length above the plane of the hymen. The incidence of PHVP has been reported to affect up to 43% of hysterectomies. The risk of prolapse following hysterectomy is 5.5 times more common in women whose initial hysterectomy was for pelvic organ prolapse as opposed to other reasons. Techniques available to manage PHVP aim to ultimately suspend the vaginal vault. Approaches include vaginal, e.g. uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous ligament fixation, open procedures and more recently laparoscopic, e.g. sacrocolpopexy and uterosacral plication. Data published so far do not allow to draw a firm conclusion about the best treatment to prevent PHVP for women undergoing hysterectomy for stage II-III pelvic organ prolapse. Considering this scenario, in the current study the investigators aim to evaluate short and long-term outcomes after total laparoscopic hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension to the uterosacral ligaments versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty for the treatment of stage II-III pelvic organ prolapse.

This is a single-center prospective cohort study sponsored by the University Hospitals Leuven (UZ). Women will undergo a pelvic floor ultrasound and will be asked to fill out a questionnaire at the time of their admission into the labour suite, at the postpartum check-up and 12 months postpartum. The primary objective is to correlate self-reported symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD) (binary outcome) at one year after delivery with structural changes to the Pelvic Floor Muscles (PFM) and postpartum evidence of levator avulsion (binary indicator) as measured by TransPerineal UltraSound (TPUS). Secondary objectives are to compare demographical and obstetrical variables between patients suffering from PFD symptoms or pelvic floor injury (documented one year after delivery) and those who do not; to record how patients manage and cope with PFD including recovery and compliance with Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) as prescribed in the standard pathway of peripartum care; and to use of TPUS images for the development of artificial intelligence tools for automated image analysis. Primary outcomes are PFD symptoms one year after delivery and injury to the PFM evidenced by POP-Q and TPUS. The demographic variables and information about the pregnancy and the delivery will be obtained from the medical records. The presence and severity of PFD will be measured using standardized self-reporting tools: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Index (POP-DI), Patient Assessment Constipation-SYMptoms (PAC-SYM), International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence - Short Form (ICIQ-SF), St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Female Sexual Distress Scale - Revised (FSDS-R). FSFI is a widely used generic tool with sufficient granularity and validated in a large number of languages. FSDS-R assesses the construct "personal distress", which has been considered as an additional important aspect contributing to sexual dysfunction of women. PFD, as a clustered outcome, being the presence of any kind of pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms, will be defined as POP-DI score of ≥11 OR ICIQ-SF score of ≥1 OR SMIS score of ≥1 OR FSFI score ≤ 26.55 OR FSDS-R score ≥11.

A prospective randomized controlled study intended to compare the efficacy of 2 methods of robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse: Via single-port. Via multi-port.

OBJECTIVE: To find out the effectiveness of physical therapy for stages I and II pelvic organ prolapse. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled and single blinded clinical trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of these groups: Experimental group: physical therapy + training in lifestyle advice; Control group: just training in means of lifestyle advice. In both groups several physical therapy assessments will be undertaken: 1st before intervention; 2nd immediately after completing intervention; 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. SUBJECTS: Women with previously untreated prolapse of stage I or II (confirmed by their gynaecologist using the POP-Q) in Príncipe de Asturias Hospital, provided that there is no contraindication for physical therapy, and after reading, understanding and freely signing an informed consent form. SAMPLE SIZE: A total of 120 subjects will be included in the study (60 subjects in each group). DATA ANALYSIS: A descriptive analysis will be done of all the variables, as well as bivariate analysis in order to find all the possible relationships between the variables. A confidence level of 95% (p<0.05) will be established for all the cases. Effectiveness will be evaluated by comparing between the two groups of the change in outcome variables between visits.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, recurrence, postoperative complications of partially absorbable mesh(Seratom®PA) in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Primary Aim: The primary aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare vaginal mesh and suture exposure rates in women undergoing robotic total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy with a light-weight polypropylene mesh (Upsylon™ y-mesh) using permanent (polytetrafluoroethylene, Gore-Tex) versus delayed absorbable monofilament (2-0 polydioxanone, PDS) sutures through 1-year. Secondary Aims: To compare the 1-year composite success rate (leading edge of prolapse is at or above the hymen and apex has descended less than 1/3 of the vaginal length, no subjective feeling of bulge; and no retreatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or vaginal mesh exposure) of permanent versus delayed absorbable sutures for mesh graft attachment during robotic total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. To evaluate adverse outcomes in each group

The objective of the EVeRLAST study is to determine whether expedited resumption of postoperative activity levels is non-inferior to standard activity restrictions with respect to short-term anatomic prolapse outcomes. We hypothesize that immediate resumption of physical activities as tolerated will result in noninferior surgical outcomes following prolapse surgery when compared to standard postoperative activity restrictions. Participants will be enrolled and randomized at their preoperative clinic visit to one of two treatment arms: Arm 1: Standard instructions (no heavy lifting over 10lbs for 6 weeks; return to work at 4 weeks for sedentary work and 6 weeks for manual labor) Arm 2: Liberal instructions (no restrictions; resume activities and work as soon as able) We will also collect subjective and objective measures of pre- and postoperative physical activity, through the use of patient-reported physical activity assessments and wrist-worn accelerometers. Accelerometer data will be collected at the preoperative, 2-week-postoperative, and 6-week-postoperative time points. Accelerometer data will also be used to calculate time to resumption of normal activities, defined as time at which a patient resumes greater than 90% of her baseline preoperative level of physical activity. We will additionally be collecting data on relevant patient-reported outcomes of pelvic floor symptom severity, health-related quality of life measures, postoperative pain, time to return to work (where relevant), and patient global impression of improvement. Postoperative anatomic assessments will be performed at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively by blinded study personnel

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the UpholdTM LITE mesh over a 12 month follow up period, using a composite outcome including a good anatomical correction for both anterior and apical compartments (stage 0 or 1), no prolapse (bulge) symptoms (answer "no" at question 3 of the PFDI-20) and no reintervention for recurrent prolapse of the anterior or apical compartment.