Active clinical trials for "Pelvic Organ Prolapse"

This prospective randomized surgical trial is designed to compare objective and subjective outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lateral suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Introduction and Hypothesis: Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS), which is a combined surgical approach where a vaginal hysterectomy is initially performed, followed by transvaginal placement of synthetic mesh and laparoscopic suspension, can be an alternative to overcome the dissection, suturing limitations of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The aim of this study was to compare the middle term anatomic outcomes, complication rates, and operative times of patients with uterovaginal prolapse undergoing VALS with those of women undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study that evaluates operation times, anesthesia times, estimated blood loss, middle term outcomes, perioperative and postoperative complications. We compared the results of 47 women who had the VALS to that of 32 abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

A Randomized Clinical Trial on Laparoscopic Fascial posterior vaginal duplication with absorbable sutures plus sacral colpopexy mesh placement VS sacral colpopexy isolated for vaginal posterior prolapse

The investigators have performed colposacropexy in women with uterovaginal prolapse for many years with satisfactory results. This study was designed to compare whether, in the treatment of patients with uro-genital prolapse and urinary incontinence, the addition of a contemporary anti-incontinence procedure such as mini-sling is associated with a reduction of post-operative urinary incontinence (correction of pre-existent urinary incontinence and prevention of masked urinary incontinence).

The lifetime risk for a woman to undergo surgery for either vaginal prolapse or urinary incontinence is high. There are many different surgical techniques for treatment of prolapse, but there is a lack of knowledge about factors that contribute to objective result and patient satisfaction after surgery. The aim of the study is to investigate factors that could be related to patient satisfaction and objective result such as pelvic floor muscle contractility/strength and muscle injury, objective measures of prolapse and women's symptoms. This study will investigate whether systematic pelvic floor exercise and life style advise before surgery can improve outcomes after surgery for either vaginal prolapse. Another aim is to determine an ultrasound scale for measure of pelvic floor muscle contraction.

It was aimed to evaluate the quality of life and sexual function of patients by Pre- and postoperative POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification) staging and PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire) test of patients who underwent lateral suspension operation with V-NOTES (Vaginal-Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery) Technique.

Investigators separated 20 patients with uterovaginal prolapse into 2 groups according to random numbers table. In one group, conventional abdominal sacral hysteropexy will be perform and another group bilateral abdominal sacral hysteropexy will be perform with polypropylene mesh. After 1 mont operation vaginal configuration will be evaluate with MRI on three plane (axial, sagittal, coronal). Then the results of thus two groups will be compare to results of nullipara patients. Investigators will investigate which technique keep the vaginal axis is closer to the original anatomic position.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Veritas Collagen Matrix in treating female patients with documented occurence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse as evidenced by a cystocele.

The primary objective of this study is to compare 30-day complication rates associated with promontofixation for pelvic organ prolapse performed via a robot-assisted laparoscopic technique versus a non-robot-assisted laparoscopic technique. Secondary objectives include comparing technical data, anatomical correction, prolapse recurrence, incontinence, quality of life and medico-economic data between the two techniques. The patient diary did not allow the collection of sufficiently precise data to meet the secondary medico-economic objective of the study. Access to data from the National Health Data System (SDNS), which was not available at the time of the initial drafting of this protocol, now makes it possible to obtain a complete picture of patients' health care consumption. We propose, therefore, to extract data from the SNIIRAM via the SNDS (matching of patients' NIR to their health care consumption) in order to retrieve and accurately estimate the cost of follow-up.

It is unknown whether it is best to do the TVT( procedure for urinary stress incontinence in women) at the time of prolapse surgery or at a later date. Women with both conditions were randomized to both procedures together or the TVT 3 months after the prolapse surgery. Any or no leakage when couching was the main end-point, evaluated 1 year after the last surgery