Active clinical trials for "Appendicitis"

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Reverse Conversion (Open to Laparoscopic) in management of Acute Perforated Appendicitis

Blockage of the transverse abdomen (TAP) promotes excellent analgesia of the abdominal wall and the parietal peritoneum. The TAP block could advange the postoperative pain of Appendectomy in children. The world literature doesn´t focus the best Ropivacaine´s concentration to improve postoperative pain in Appendectomy in children. We propose a randomized trial that compares 3 groups children submitted Appendectomy in children between 6 and 16 years. The control group has received no blockade, the other two groups have received TAP blocks if ropivacaine 0,25% and 0,5% 0.4ml/kg.

The major goal of the project is to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting a multi-center randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for the treatment of patients with acute uncomplicated appendicitis by conducting a single-site pilot study so as to optimize the chance of a large multi-center clinical trial's future success.

Laparoscopic appendicectomy is widely practiced in Hong Kong nowadays with shorter hospital stay and less wound complications. Most of the time, three small wounds of less than 10mm will be adequate enough for the completion of the surgery with minimal pain. Recently, the concept of Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (N.O.T.E.S) led to the attention of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) again in the surgical community. SILS is not a new idea. The first SILS for cholecystectomy was reported in 1997 by Navarra et al. However, the close proximity of the instruments, limitation in triangulation during dissection and suboptimal exposure of the surgical field has made this approach unpopular in last decade. Because the concept of N.O.T.E.S and the newly designed access port, surgeons are now focused again on SILS. The Chinese University of Hong Kong has recently release their preliminary results on the use of SILS on appendicectomy with satisfactory results in terms of less post-operative pain and less prominent scar. However, it was a case series with limited number of patients. In order to test the advantages of SILS on the management of patients with acute appendicitis, a double blinded randomized clinical trial is conducted.

The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different operative strategies for perforated appendicitis with abscess. The hypothesis is that the increased difficulty of early operation is balanced by the immense patient investment with delayed operation.

Patients who are diagnosed with acute appendicitis consented and then randomized into two arms of the trial. In one arm, patients receive irrigation of the abdomen during surgery with normal saline, or salt water. In the other arm, patients receive irrigation of the abdomen during surgery with sterile water. Sometimes patients receive no irrigation if none is determined to be needed at the time of operation by the surgeon. We then followed patients after surgery for 30 days. The hypothesis of this study was that the use of sterile water as irrigation fluid during surgery in patients who have acute appendicitis will decrease the chance of a post-operative abscess or infection.

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of non-operative management of early appendicitis in children. We hypothesize that non-operative management of early appendicitis in children with antibiotics alone will be successful in 80% of children at 1 year follow-up.

The objective of this study is to determine whether administering once-daily doses of metronidazole, an intravenous (IV) antibiotic used to prevent infection in perforated appendicitis, is as effective in children as delivering it in the standard method of once every eight hours. Reducing the frequency of administration has the potential of decreasing personnel time and healthcare cost and increasing the lifespan of the IV line. To determine the effectiveness once-daily administration, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to compare outcomes between the two treatment schedules. We will recruit 100 patients (50 per treatment) aged 5-18 being surgically treated for perforated appendicitis at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, who will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment schedules. To compare the efficacy of the treatments, outcomes such as duration of hospital stay and theoretical cost will be measured and analyzed using statistical tests.

To compare the results associated with two different skin closure techniques in open appendectomy. 200 patients were included after acute appendicitis diagnosis in emergency department. They were grouped randomly into two groups: patients who would receive skin closure with skin closure by an unique absorbable intradermic stitch (Group A) and another that would receive a habitual technique consistent in non absorbable separated stitches (Group B). General characteristics like gender, age, body mass index (IMC), comorbidities and allergies were registered. Days of evolution (DOE) until surgery, use of antibiotics previously, complicated or uncomplicated appendicitis, surgery time and wound complications like skin infection, dehiscence, seroma or abscess were registered in each case too,

it is randomized control study. two groups of children (n=191) were divided into two groups A and B. Group A included children subjected to the classical protocol of diagnosis of acute appendicitis. this protocol consisted of pediatric appendicitis score evaluation, pelvi abdominal ultrasound and measurement of serum CRP. Group B, children had the same previous assessment plus measurement of urinary 5-HIAA.