Active clinical trials for "Appendicitis"

Comparing the incidence of complicated appendicitis between two groups, the pandemic and pre-pandemic groups.

Acute appendicitis is a major cause of acute abdomen. Although its diagnosis is clinical, it is often supported by complementary diagnostic tests. Sometimes, delay in diagnosis can lead to worsening of the clinical picture, resulting in a complicated acute appendicitis. Some series have studied some clinical and analytical parameters as possible predictors of complicated acute appendicitis. A retrospective analysis of patients admitted for acute appendicitis and undergoing appendectomy between January 2014 and December 2017 was performed in order to assess the possible existence of preoperative analytical predictive factors for complicated acute appendicitis (such as leukocytosis, C-reactive protein and ratio between neutrophils and lymphocytes).

Background The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on medical services is overwhelming due to limited medical resources. During its initial surge in 2020, Taiwan's government rapidly established diverse public actions, which helped maintain the medical supply without travel restrictions. However, whether the fear of being infected with COVID-19 interfered with health-seeking behavior (HSB) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate whether acute complicated appendicitis (ACA) rates in adults were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A retrospective analysis of acute appendicitis in adults was performed between January 1 and June 30, 2020 (COVID-19 period). The control period was collected from the first two quarters for the preceding 3 years. Outcome measures were ACA and length of hospital stays.

Clinical and histopathological description of three cases of Kawasaki disease with acute abdomen.

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is difficult and despite important advances in medical sciences, detailed patient questioning and precise medical examination are the main keystones of the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and up to now, results still unsatisfactory.

The values of laboratory examinations which are useful for the diagnoses of appendicitis are white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte blood sedimentation rate (ESR). However up to date there is no laboratory marker for the pre-operative diagnosis of appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis. Recently hyperbilirubinaemia has been associated with appendiceal perforation. Aim of this retrospective study is therefore to investigate if hyperbilirubinaemia has a diagnostic value for the pre-operative diagnosis of appendiceal perforation in patients with appendicitis.

The investigators performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing appendicectomy from March-November 2018 using the online theatre database and discharge letters. CA was defined as patients with perforated or gangrenous appendicitis on histology. Patients were divided into 2 groups; Group 1 (G1) included patients with CA who had a drain inserted; Group 2 (G2) included patients with CA and no drain.

This is a retrospective observational study with its main aim of evaluating possible factors associated with complicated appendicitis. Current literature supports time from symptom onset until registration as the main and maybe only determinant of the outcome if patients are operated on within 24 hours. We wish to evaluate whether this is true in all patients, or there are subgroups in which time from registration to operation is associated with complicated appendicitis.

It is not known whether appendectomy for acute appendicitis (AA) increases the Cesarean section (CS) rate and whether CS increases the likelihood of AA and appendectomy in the early puerperium. In this study, delivery type and delivery outcomes and appendectomy during pregnancy and puerperium were analyzed.

Background Acute appendicitis is an extremely common surgical emergency. Traditionally, appendicitis has been managed surgically. Recently, however, variability in management of acute appendicitis has emerged, with some clinicians practising conservative, i.e. non-operative, management in selected patients. This high-quality pan-European, prospective audit will establish current practices and correlate them against outcomes. Aim To explore differences in patient presentation, clinical course and outcomes for acute appendicitis across international clinical Centres to identify areas of practice variability in the presentation, management and complications of acute appendicitis. Endpoints A three-stage data collection strategy will be used in this audit. There will be a 90 day prospective period for data collection during a six month window from September 2020 to end February 2021. Data collection will consist of collecting patient demographics, details of management (conservative vs surgical) and outcomes. Several outcomes measures will be used, including surgical mortality, morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade 2 and above) and length of hospital stay. The data collection points are as follows: 90 Day Prospective Audit Collecting anytime during 6-month window: Demographics Operative technique Use of antibiotics Conservative vs surgical management Outcomes All eligible patients will be followed up to 90 days from their admission Readmissions will be flagged and identified Complications within the 90 day period will be recorded Patients who have a complete data set at 90 days post presentation will be followed up to the 1-year mark • Incomplete data sets will be excluded from the study Methods: This 90 day prospective audit will be performed across Europe from September 2020 to end February 2021., and will be co-ordinated by a designated committee of European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. This will be preceded by a one-week, three-Centre pilot. Sites will be asked to pre-register for the audit and will be required to obtain appropriate regional or national approvals in advance of the enrolment date. During the study period, all eligible patients with acute appendicitis will be recorded contemporaneously and followed-up through to 90 days from their admission. The audit will be performed using a standardised pre-determined protocol, instrument and a secure online database. The report of this audit will be prepared in accordance with guidelines set by the STROBE (strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology) statement for observational studies. Discussion: This multi-centre, snapshot audit will be delivered by emergency surgeons and trainees in an coordinated and homogenous manner. The data obtained about areas of variability in provision or practice, and how this may impact upon outcomes, will serve to improve overall patient care as well as being hypothesis generating and inform areas needing future prospective study.