Active clinical trials for "Peripheral Arterial Disease"

To see if restenosis rates of superficial femoral artery atherosclerosis with percutaneous techniques can be improved using paclitaxel.

To determine the safety and efficacy of the Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System in subjects with atherosclerotic de novo or restenotic lesions in the native common iliac artery and/or native external iliac artery.

The purpose of this study is to determine if stem cell therapy with one's own cells (autologous cells) delivered intramuscularly to one's leg with ulcer and/or gangrene due to poor blood flow will be safe and if it will relieve leg pain, increase blood flow, and/or cure the leg wound.

Study title: A Study of Blood-Borne Autologous Angiogenic Cell Precursors Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia ( ACPs-CLI ) Principle Investigator: Assoc.Prof. Pramook Mutirangura,M.D. Head of Division of Vascular Surgery , Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital , Mahidol University, BKK,Thailand Study objective : To determine the safety and efficacy of intramuscular injection of blood-borne autologous ACPs in relieving symptoms of critical limb ischemia of patients treated with maximal medical therapy and don't have intravascular or operative revascularization option. Study Design : A pilot study , a single center, a non-randomized, open-label trial. Total expected no. of patients : 6 main selection criteria : A. Subjects will have one or more clinical indications diagnostic of CLI such as: distal extremity pain at rest that requires the subject to use analgesics for >2 weeks; or peripheral ischemic ulcer(s); or areas of gangrene ; or non-healing ischemic ulcers AND B. Subjects will have one or more of the following hemodynamic indicators of severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease: I. Ankle brachial index < 0.45 II. Toe brachial index < 0.35 III. TcPO2 / TcO2 of < 40 mmHg. C. The subject is a poor candidate for standard revascularization treatment for peripheral arterial disease, based on inadequate bypass conduit, or unfavorable anatomy D. Age 18 to 80 years Investigational Product : At D-8 250 ml of blood drawn from the patients for production of autologous EPCs or ACPs (VescellTM). On D0 ,at least 1.5 million ACPs with viability >75 % suspended in 30 ml sterile cell culture medium will be injected 1.5 cm deep and 1.5 apart by a 23 -gauge needle into the gastrocnemius muscle of the leg chosen (ischemic leg) for treatment. For injection planning a grid of 10X10 cm will be prepared and in each point 1 ml of ACPs suspension will be injected. The study consists of 4 periods: Screening ( D-14 to-9& D-8,Treatment(D0),Acute Safety follow-up (D1&D2),Chronic follow-up (D30 & D90)period ,total follow-up of each case is 3 months. Evaluation criteria : Safety : no.& duration of adverse event & serious adverse event Efficacy :Attenuate CLI patients symptoms (Rest pain,Pain-free walking distance,Ulcer size &Gangrene dimension and intensity)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the Xpert(TM) self-expanding stent in infrapopliteal lesions as part of an overall treatment strategy in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention for the treatment of documented chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether sapropterin dihydrochloride is safe and effective in the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC) caused by peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

The Easy Flype Carbostent™ is a CE-marked nitinol self-expanding stent for superficial femoral artery (SFA) and Easy HiFlype Carbostent™is a CE-marked nitinol self-expanding stent for iliac vessels. The aim of this post-market retrospective study protocl P42201 is to collect clinical data of patients treated with Easy Flype or Easy Hi Flype for the stenosis or occlusion of the iliac artery, femoral artery and first third of the popliteal artery in routine clinical practice. In order to obtain long-term follow-up data, the data collection will be limited to patients that have been treated with these devices at least 12 months prior to the study start.

The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in the Elderly1 defines sarcopenia as a disorder of the progressive and generalized musculoskeletal system [1], which is associated with the increase and probability of adverse outcomes including falls, fractures, physical disability, and mortality [2]. what is associated with increased and likelihood of adverse outcomes including falls, fractures, disability physical and mortality [2]. For a long time, sarcopenia was associated with aging, affecting onlyold people. At present and after several research works related to fragility and theaging, it has been identified that the development of sarcopenia begins earlier in life [3], and that there are many contributing causes besides aging [4], [5]. This new knowledge has implications in the intervention of sarcopenia that prevents or delays its development. Sarcopenia is currently considered a muscle disease (muscle failure), based on adverse changes in the muscles of the musculoskeletal system accumulated throughout life, with loss of muscle strength such as main determinant [6], [7]. Sarcopenia has been overlooked in clinical practice, apparently due to to the complexity in determining the variables to be measured, how to measure them, and the values or cut-off points can guide diagnosis and treatment, and how best to assess the effects of therapeutic intervention [8]. In terms economic, the presence of sarcopenia increases the risk of hospitalization and increases the cost of care during hospital admission [9]. Diabetes is the main cause of non-traumatic amputation of the lower limb (MI), being foot ulcers diabetic the cause of 80% of the amputations of people with diabetes[10]. A study conducted by the Chongqing University Hospital showed that sarcopenia is independently related to the foot diabetic and that patients with diabetic foot have a worse prognosis if they suffer from sarcopenia. HYPOTHESIS: The surface electromyography (EMGs) signal recording of the foot musculature, will allow extracting biomarkers that allow monitoring and follow-up of sarcopenia in diabetic patients. MAIN OBJECTIVES: 1- Generate tools based on artificial intelligence (AI) using the database with the biomarkers obtained, in order to analyze the predisposing and triggering risk factors associated with diabetic foot ulcers, according to the IWGDF2. 2- Describe the profile of the diabetic patient in terms of degree of sarcopenia with respect to the population without diabetes in a group of adults. DESIGN: Observational study comparison between cases and controls: a group with the presence of Diabetes Mellitus and another without. SAMPLE: Approximately 16% of diabetic patients will develop an ulcer during their evolution and the Annual incidence is 2-3%, which doubles to 6% in the presence of polyneuropathy. Population of the Department of Health 168,978. Prevalence of diabetes in Spain 7.8%. It is estimated that there are 13,182 in the department people with diabetes. Confidence level 95%, expected frequency of ulcers 6% and confidence limit 9%, it was calculates the sample of 26 patients. 30 patients per group will be recruited. GROUP 1: 30 patients with Diabetes Mellitus. GROUP 2: 30 control patients without Diabetes Mellitus. The period of inclusion of patients is estimated at 5 months. METHOD: the assessment interventions will be carried out in two days. During the first visit, examination to identify risk to the foot: clinical history (PA, comorbidity data, previous injuries to the feet). feet..), examination of the vascular state, examination of loss of protective sensitivity, perception of pressure, skin inspection, inspection of bone/joint structures, physical limitations and level of knowledge of the foot care. During the second visit: diagnostic tests for sarcopenia (bioimpedance and electromyography), arthropometric measurements, malnutrition, dependence and activity marker tests. EXPECTED RESULTS: clarify some aspects related to the sarcopenia-diabetic foot binomial, and isolate risk factors for future prevention, by obtaining biomarkers with EMGs in lower limbs.

The purpose of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of GENOSS DCB versus IN.PACT Admiral DCB on late lumen loss 6 months after the procedure in patients with de novo or non-stented restenotic lesions of the superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery and to evaluate the safety. This clinical trial will be conducted on a total of 118 patients at 11 domestic institutions (taking into account the dropout rate of 30%).

The Global Vascular Guideline on chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) proposes the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS), a new angiographic scoring system to quantify the anatomic severity of infrainguinal disease in CLTI patients. However, GLASS validation still needs to be completed, and the infrapopliteal (IP) target artery pathway (TAP) was easily influenced by the procedures. Thus the IP target artery could be selected either as the least diseased artery based on angiography or prospectively based on the angiosome concept. So the investigators aim to evaluate its correlation with clinical outcomes after revascularization.