Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common rhythm disturbance of the heart. It can affect people of any age but usually happens as we get older. It can cause palpitations, breathlessness, lethargy, and fainting attacks. It is also associated with an increased risk of strokes. The best treatment for it at the moment involves burning or freezing (ablation) the heart muscle in a part of the heart called the left atrium. The ablation injures the heart muscle around the so-called pulmonary veins and the procedure is called a 'pulmonary vein isolation'. This procedure work in about 60% of people. The study team have found that there are nerve endings in the heart that also cause AF and have shown that ablating these nerve endings also prevents AF. These Nerve endings are known as ganglionated plexuses (GPs). The study team would now like to perform a trial in people who still have AF after the usual pulmonary vein procedure. The study team hope that ablating the nerve endings that cause AF (GPs), we will stop their AF coming back. The study team will compare this procedure to the normal approach of doing the pulmonary vein isolation again

This prospective randomized trial aims to compare recovery time from discontinuation of remimazolam followed by flumazenil administration vs. propofol total intravenous anesthesia as the main general anesthetics during radiofrequency catheter ablation treatment of atrial fibrillation.

The selection of the optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is challenging. Until recently, triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) consisting in Aspirin plus Clopidogrel plus OAC was considered the treatment of choice. While efficiently preventing ischaemic events, TAT is associated with an increase in bleeding complications. Therefore, in the past years several randomized controlled trials challenged TAT by comparing a triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) regimen based on Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to a dual antithrombotic regimen (DAT) based on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and P2Y12-inhibitors, mainly Clopidogrel in patients with AF undergoing PCI. However, approximately 30-40% of patients show low response to Clopidogrel and are not adequately protected against ischaemic events, in particular when presenting with ACS. This is supported by a recent meta-analysis reporting that TAT compared to DAT is associated with lower rates of stent thrombosis within 30 days after PCI. It is therefore reasonable to assume that a more potent platelet inhibition within the first month after PCI might reduce the rate of ischaemic complications observed in AF patients undergoing PCI, when receiving DAT. Moreover, a subsequent de-escalation to a less potent platelet inhibition one month after PCI might prevent an increase in bleeding complications. In EPIDAURUS the investigators will therefore test the hypothesis that DAT using NOAC plus an escalated antiplatelet therapy with a potent P2Y12-inhibitor for one month followed by Clopidogrel reduces ischaemic events without a relevant increase in bleeding complications in patients with AF and ACS undergoing PCI compared to standard DAT with NOAC plus Clopidogrel.

STUDY DESIGN A prospective study. OBJECTIVE A single center clinical trial on the analysis of intracardiac atrial electrogram waveform periodicity for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation with OCTARAY™ Mapping Catheter, as prospective randomized controlled study. HYPOTHESIS: The critical atrial substrates in maintaining persistent atrial fibrillation could be identified by non-linear electrogram morphology analysis in a point-by-point electroanatomic mapping. Based on the previous study, atrial substrate with high-similarity electrogram regions correlated with procedural AF termination and better long-term AF-free (1). Therefore, we proposed that the degree of waveform similarity plus the beat-to-beat sequential morphology (2) (duration of how many similar waveforms can maintain in sequence) would be even better to characterize the atrial substrate and could be potentially critical atrial substrate in prediction of sources of AF. As additional substrate mapping provided benefits compared to PVI alone in patients with persistent AF, we hypothesize that waveform periodicity adjuvant to electrogram similarity and phase mapping could be used to guide radiofrequency ablation in real time. The used of the OCTARAY™ Mapping Catheter could collected more AF electrogram and facilitate the mapping resolution and driver identification.

Subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common disorder that typically results from head trauma and has increased in prevalence in recent decades. Acute subdural hematomas (aSDH) are found in up to one-third of patients with severe traumatic brain injury and are associated with an unfavorable outcome in the majority of cases. Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) commonly occur in the elderly population which has highest risk for developing cSDH with or without minor head injuries. The combination of the aging population, higher incidence of disease in progressively older patients, and high morbidity and mortality renders SDH a growing problem within Canada with significant health-systems burden. SDH commonly recurs even after successful surgical drainage. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common medical comorbidities in patients with cSDH, especially in the elderly, with an expected doubling of its prevalence by the year 2030. Patients with AF are at recognized risk for stroke, so anticoagulation is indicated for almost all patients. Anticoagulation is held prior to SDH drainage to minimize the risk of intraoperative and early postoperative bleeding. After surgery, the risk of SDH recurrence must be balanced against the risk of thromboembolic events such as stroke when deciding the timing of resuming anticoagulation. Currently the decision on when to restart anticoagulation after SDH is made by clinicians on an individual patient basis without any high-quality evidence to guide this decision. The two most common approaches are: 1) early resumption of anticoagulation after 30 days of diagnosis or surgery; and 2) delayed resumption of anticoagulation after 90 days of diagnosis or surgery. However, which of these approaches leads to the best functional outcomes for patients is unclear. Our pilot RCT will test the feasibility of comparing these 2 approaches in a larger multicenter RCT.

This trial will compare two management strategies for HF patients with Atrial Fibrillation. The active control group will undergo BiV pacing, followed by an AV node ablation. The experimental group will undergo LBBAP, followed by an AV node ablation.

The AFFELECT -study compares two types of treatment modalities for acute atrial fibrillation or flutter for patients in whom rhythm control is desirable. The main purpose is to observe if these arrhythmias can be safely treated electively (within 5-9 days). All patients are recruited in the emergency department. Patients must be in good clinical condition so that they can be discharged regardless to which treatment modality is randomly selected to them. Patients randomized to conventional care are treated conventionally which means acute rhythm control is applied by electrical or medical cardioversion in the emergency department (within 48 hours of onset of the arrhythmia). Patients randomized to elective care are discharged immediately after adequate temporary rhythm control is assured. All patients will visit a cardiologist out-patient clinic at approximately one week after the emergency room visit. Patients randomized to elective treatment and still in atrial fibrillation or in atrial flutter will be restored to sinus rhythm by electrical or medical cardioversion at the out-patient clinic. Cardiovascular status and treatment options are evaluated for all patients. Anticoagulation is managed according existing guidelines for all patients. Due to possibility of delayed cardioversion in the interventional group (elective care group), all patients receive anticoagulation before the out-patient clinic despite their thromboembolic risk. All patients who have not received adequate anticoagulation for three weeks prior to the delayed cardioversion will undergo a transesophageal cardiac ultrasound to ensure they are not in excess risk for thromboembolic events. Patients randomized to elective treatment have the possibility to opt-out and undergo acute cardioversion if their symptoms are unmanageable during the first week before the out-patient clinical. All patients are monitored for their symptoms by a standardized quality-of-life questionnaire and for possibly required acute medical interventions during the first week and one month after the out-patient clinic. After one month, all patients undergo an electrocardiography (ECG) to ensure the maintenance of normal rhythm in both treatment groups. After the months follow-up all patients are subsequently monitored for a maximum of five years for need of medical interventions due to atrial fibrillation of atrial flutter. New antiarrhythmics such as flecainide are not prescribed during the first month.

Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome associated with de novo atrial fibrillation are randomized to benefit from either a conventional therapy associating dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and anticoagulant or DAPT and an implantable monitoring device with a follow-up by telecardiology

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that leads to increased risk of heart failure, hospitalization, thromboembolic events, and death. Restoration of normal heart rhythm is performed in many patients with AF to improve symptoms. In this study, the investigators will consider patients who fail 2 or more trials of DC cardioversion as having refractory AF. The aim of this study is to assess whether the use of double sequential defibrillation in patients with refractory AF has a higher success rate in reverting them to a normal heart rhythm than a third cardioversion. This is a phase III, randomized controlled, single-centered, superiority trial. All patients with AF admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) for DC cardioversion, and refractory to at least two trials of DC cardioversion will be enrolled. Patients are randomized into two arms: the first will receive a third trial of DC cardioversion (standard of care) and the second will receive double sequential external defibrillation. The resolution of AF by reverting back to normal sinus rhythm is the primary outcome of the investigators. This will be determined using EKG (electrocardiogram) immediately after DC cardioversion or double sequential defibrillation.

The aim of the study is to evaluate different ablation strategies in patients with AF recurrences despite chronic PVI after prior catheter ablation. The present study is a multi-centre prospective randomized study enrolling 256 patients with drug-refractory AF despite previous AF ablation. After PV remapping confirming durable PVI patients will be assigned to 2 different groups: Group A: Substrate modification. After obtaining a voltage map of the LA, substrate modification will be performed aiming at low-voltage areas (LVA) < 0.5mV. Group B: LAA isolation. Patients will undergo LAA-isolation using the cryoballoon (CB). Catheter ablation procedures will be performed with commercially available devices including 3D mapping systems (CARTO, EnSite) and irrigated radiofrequency current (RFC) ablation or cryothermal balloon ablation (Arctic Front Advance). The primary endpoint is freedom from documented recurrence of AF or any atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting > 30 seconds between day 91 and 365 after the index procedure.