Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

A multi-centre, non-blinded, comparative effectiveness, randomised controlled trial. Patients will be prospectively enrolled from Critical Care Units and will be assessed for study enrollment based on inclusion/exclusion criteria at the time of the onset of fast atrial fibrillation( irregular and often rapid heart rate). The authors hypothesize that high dose Magnesium Sulphate with the addition of Digoxin as a second line treatment will improve the success rate in returning the heart to normal rhythm as well as speed of resolution of critical illness in new onset rapid atrial fibrillation in the critically ill cared for in general ICUs.

This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing the relative efficacy and safety of cryoablation of PVs using the Arctic Front Advance® balloon catheter with antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with persistent AF.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is an effective rhythm control method that shows superior rhythm outcome than antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) treatment in drug-resistant AF. However, AF catheter ablation still has a substantial recurrence rate. The current AAD use guidelines for AF management focus on the safety of drug use. However, if the AAD efficacy evaluation system using computer modeling reflecting the individual anatomy, electrophysiology, and histological characteristics of patients is practical, it will help to select a more effective AAD type or dose. The purpose of this study is to conduct a prospective randomized clinical study on the efficacy and safety of computer modeling for optimal AAD selection in patients with recurrent AF after catheter ablation. The investigator will evaluate the efficacy of AAD simulations by comparing virtual AAD effect guided therapy and empirical AAD use in patients with recurrent AF after AF catheterization. The investigator will test the virtual AAD effects in the computer simulations integrated by cardiac images and 3D electrophysiological maps obtained during de novo AF ablation. The investigator will compare the effects of the most potent AAD selected by virtual AAD simulation with those of empirical AAD.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) impacts the lives of 30 million people worldwide. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by catheter ablation is effective for paroxysmal AF, but the success rate remains marginal at 60-80%. For persistent AF, defined as continuous AF that sustains longer than 7 days, the success rate is even lower. The low success rate of AF ablation reflects the fact that there is no effective target identified to modify the underlying substrate beyond PVI. Recently, investigators have made an exciting discovery that higher mean CT attenuation values of peri-atrial fat tissue, correlated with inflammatory fat, are associated with higher incidence of recurrence after AF ablation. In this protocol, investigators will investigate the clinical significance of peri-atrial inflammatory fat tissue in AF using ultra-high resolution CT.

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of three different ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF: PV antral isolation alone (PVAI) PV antral isolation plus ablation of drivers (PVAI+drivers) PV antral isolation plus isolation of posterior wall (PVAI+box) All three strategies will employ contemporary catheter ablation technology using more efficient open irrigated tip cooling and contact force sensing.

The purpose of this research is to evaluate whether cryoballoon ablation vs. radiofrequency ablation guided by high-fidelity mapping (Rhythmia) is the best treatment strategy to perform repeat ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation after previously having undergone cryoballoon ablation.

SAFE-LAAC Trial has been designed to gather data on the most optimal strategy of antiplatelet therapy after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion with Amplatzer or WATCHMAN device

The protocol aims to evaluate the efficacy of the radial ablation technique of the maintenance mechanisms in persistent atrial fibrillation compared to the isolation of the pulmonary veins evaluating the atrial fibrillation burden during one year follow-up.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects more than 43 million people worldwide, but specific exercise recommendations do not exist for this group of patients. Despite a lack of evidence, athletes are often advised to reduce exercise intensity (detraining) after being diagnosed with AF. This randomized controlled trial will be the first study that investigates effects of detraining in endurance athletes. Participants will be randomized to an intervention group that will be instructed to refrain from high intensity exercise, and a control group. The study aims to clarify whether detraining might reduce the burden of AF and has the potential to guide development of exercise guidelines for AF patients.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and has a rising prevalence due to an aging population. AF increases the patient's risk of hospitalization, heart failure and stroke and results into deterioration of quality of life. Treatment of symptomatic AF consists of either antiarrhythmic medication or a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) catheter ablation. However, lots of patients experience recurrence of AF in the first year after PVI. Previous studies showed that PVI outcomes depend on the presence of different treatable risk factors that influence the substrate for AF. Those risk factors include obesity, hypertension, cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, alcohol use, smoking and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, research into the effect of treatment of those risk factors mainly consists of observational studies. Currently, it is not clear to what extent patients will benefit from comprehensive risk factor treatment prior to PVI in terms of ablation success and quality of life. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to determine the effect of a nurse-led, technology-supported, personalized care pathway on hospital admissions for cardioversions and re-ablation in patients with AF that are referred for ablation. Patients included in this study will be randomized to either the intervention group receiving the comprehensive risk treatment before PVI or the control group receiving standard usual care. Patients in the intervention group will visit the specialized AF nurse outpatient clinic and receive a personalized treatment plan (with a maximal duration of 6 months) including lifestyle interventions and medication. This includes sleep apnea screening with a Home Sleep Apnea Test (WatchPAT). Patients will also use the VitalHealth Engage platform. The digital platform can be used at home to report AF complaints, send home measurement and complete questionnaires. Furthermore, it supports the nurse in administering effective lifestyle changes by offering the patient personalized content and education. Both study groups will be followed up to 12 months after ablation, during which hospital admissions for cardioversion and re-ablation are evaluated. At baseline, AFEQT, EQ5D and TBQ quality of life questionnaires will be performed. The questionnaires will be repeated prior to ablation, at 3 and 12 months after ablation. At baseline, pre-ablation and after 12 months laboratory tests (such as cholesterol) will be performed to evaluate adherence to lifestyle interventions.