Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with concomitant non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and extracranial/intracranial artery stenosis. Participants will be 1:1 randomized into anticoagulation alone or anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy. The primary endpoint is composite events 3 months after enrollment.

Primary Aim: To determine if apixaban is superior to aspirin for prevention of the composite outcome of any stroke (hemorrhagic or ischemic) or death from any cause in patients with recent ICH and atrial fibrillation (AF). Secondary Aim: To determine if apixaban, compared with aspirin, results in better functional outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin Scale.

To assess whether edoxaban (60/30 mg daily) compared to non-antithrombotic medical therapy (either no antithrombotic therapy or antiplatelet monotherapy) reduces the risk of stroke (composite of ischemic, hemorrhagic and unspecified stroke) in high-risk atrial fibrillation (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2) patients with previous intracranial hemorrhage.

This trial will determine the clinical effectiveness of polygenic risk score testing among patients at high genetic risk for at least one of six diseases (coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes mellitus, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, or prostate cancer), measured by time-to-diagnosis of prevalent or incident disease over 24 months.

This study evaluates whether a rigorously controlled high-normal level of serum-potassium (4.5-5.0 mEq/L) using dietary recommendations, potassium supplements and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists will results in a lower incidence of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with an ICD. Patients will be randomized to this treatment or a control arm, where patients will receive usual guideline recommended follow-up.

The DaRe2 approach (healthcare Data for pragmatic clinical Research in the NHS - primary 2 secondary) is designed to operationalise efficient, nationwide, primary care approaches for randomised trials embedded within the UK National Health Service (NHS), providing automated screening, targeted patient enrolment and 'no-visit' follow-up through innovations in big data and technology solutions. DaRe2THINK will be the first exemplar of this system, and is appropriately focused on the intersection of key national priorities for healthcare; atrial fibrillation (a heart rhythm condition that will double in prevalence in the next few decades) and the impact this condition has on stroke, thromboembolic events, cognitive impairment and vascular dementia. The trial will test the hypothesis that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), now commonly used in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), are effective and cost-effective at reducing major adverse clinical events in younger patients at low or intermediate risk of stroke, and can reduce the high rate of cognitive decline. The health technology innovations noted above will allow the investigators to answer this important clinical question, as well as demonstrate the capacity and potential of this system for future, large-scale healthcare-embedded clinical trials for patient benefit.

This clinical trial will have 2 components: a brief dose-ranging study and a randomized comparison of 2 doses of AdKCNH2-G628S with control cardiac surgery patients. The study will assess safety of the intervention in a population at increased risk for post-operative atrial fibrillation.

This is a prospective, open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial of 400 participants (aged 60 years or older, with additional stroke risk factors and 'actionable' undertreated AF) from a total of 40 retail and outpatient community pharmacies. Participants will be randomized (by pharmacy) to either to an intervention arm of pharmacist-led OAC management versus an enhanced usual care arm, wherein physicians receive notification of 'actionable' AF and patients are advised to schedule a physician clinic visit. The primary objective will be to determine the difference in proportion of patients with 'actionable AF' receiving guideline concordant OAC therapy at 3 months in those randomized to intervention arm versus control arm.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common debilitating heart rhythm condition that can cause heart failure and negatively impact a patient's outlook in terms of symptoms and disability. It is an irregular fast heart rhythm disorder coming from the top chamber of the heart (left atrium). Catheter ablation treatment has been shown to be effective in controlling or eliminating AF and its associated symptoms. This is now a common and effective treatment option for patients suffering with AF. During ablation, thermal energy is applied in the top chamber of the heart (the left atrium) to abolish abnormal electrical signals that cause AF. It is generally a safe procedure, but one potential risk associated with this procedure is damage to the oesophagus caused by thermal energy being transmitted to the oesophagus from the heart. The oesophagus sits just behind the heart chamber where ablation work is performed, about 5mm away, so it is vulnerable to damage. Although the risk of severe oesophageal damage is low, if it occurs it can be serious as the patient may become very ill as a result. In a recent study, it was shown that a more advanced type of oesophageal probe that cools the oesophagus during ablation is better at protecting the oesophagus from ablation-related injury compared to the standard care probe currently used. As it was a single-centre study, more evidence is required before knowing if this type of probe is more effective in protecting the oesophagus. The purpose is to run a multi-centre randomized study to compare the safety of AF ablation when there is protection by the oesophageal cooling probe versus the standard of care oesophageal temperature monitoring probe. This means that there is a 50:50 chance of the new cooling probe being used during AF ablation for participants.

HD SAGA: There is increasing evidence that having AF is associated with some scarring of the upper chamber of the heart, the left atrium. There is also evidence that the amount of scarring can predict ablation success rates. Recently, rapid ultra high density mapping equipment has become available and this has the capability of defining the electrical scar in the atrium in detail. The equipment used to do this is standard approved equipment for the procedure but its use for making scar maps has not been fully assessed. In the mapping phase of the study therefore, the aim will be to collect high density scar maps in AF and normal rhythm to see how they compare. Maps will be collected in different ways to see if that changes their accuracy. The study will also assess if the values previously suggested as representing scar with lower density mapping systems are still appropriate where high density mapping equipment is used. The results from this study will help to improve the understanding of scar in the atrium and help demonstrate the most efficient way to collect scar information using this high density mapping equipment. In the future, clinicians may be able to use these very detailed scar maps to tailor and refine the way they ablate patients with AF, though the focus of the current study is just on collecting the scar information. While identifying areas requiring ablation is important to an ablation procedure, the other important aspect is the efficacy of ablation. Until now, we have been reliant on assessing our inputs into an ablation (such as the level of contact and the power delivered) but have been limited in the assessment of the output of an ablation in terms of lesion characteristics. New ablation catheter technology is now available which can assess the localised impedance drop with ablation. This is likely a better surrogate for lesion parameters than what we have previously had available and merits further study. Based on such study, we may be able to define targets for ablation which would help to guide future ablations. HD SAGA S: Approval amendment March 2021 In addition to the above, using new catheter technology incorporating contact force into the assessment of ablation lesion efficacy. HD SAGA H: Approval amendment March 2021 Using new mapping catheter (HD Grid) and algorithms (HD Wave) to compare scar maps between AF and SR and pre-establish pulmonary vein isolation lines.