Active clinical trials for "Atrial Fibrillation"

This study seeks to assess the effect of apnea (breath hold) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation by having all ablations performed under apnea. By prospectively studying the effects of apnea on AF ablation, the investigators wish to demonstrate its feasibility, safety and impact on patient outcomes. This is a prospective study that includes both an apnea arm and a control arm. The subjects who consent to the apnea arm will undergo an atrial fibrillation ablation with periods of apnea. The subjects who consent to the control arm will agree to have their data from their standard of care atrial fibrillation be collected for comparison.

A prospective, single center, open-label, single arm, study to evaluate the safety and technical performance of the CLAAS system for closure of the left atrial appendage.

PersAFOne: Feasibility Study of the FARAPULSE™ Endocardial Ablation System in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

The primary objective of this study is to measure device tissue coverage post-implantation of the WATCHMAN FLX™ Pro Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC) Device (WATCHMAN FLX Pro) using the serial advanced imaging modalities of cardiac computed tomography (CT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and assess its relationship, if any, to clinical events.

This is an early feasibility study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Laminar Left Atrial Appendage Closure System to treat patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation that cannot take, or a have a reason to seek an alternative, to anticoagulant medications.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Single shot devices are increasingly used for PVI. Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel cryoballoon technology has recently been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific). However, whether PolarX provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that PolarX was developed considering the reported limitations and potential failures associated with the Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon, it might be even more effective and safe for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for single shot PVI and the PolarX is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence the alternative hypothesis postulates that the PolarX Cryoballoon is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.

This is a prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical study following patients to 1 year, to evaluate the safety and performance of the Centauri system for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The study will include adult patients (age 18-75 years) who are indicated for a first-time catheter ablation of AF where the pre-procedure treatment plan contemplates pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), and PVI - with or without additional left atrial ablations - in patients with Persistent AF (PeAF) of short duration (< 1 year).

The objective of the ADVANTAGE AF Study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System (FARAPULSE PFA System) for treatment of drug resistant, symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF).

The CLAAS® device will be evaluated for safety and efficacy by establishing its performance is non-inferior to the commercially available WATCHMAN® and Amulet™ left atrial appendage closure devices in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients who are eligible for the trial will be randomized to receive either the CLAAS device or the WATCHMAN or Amulet™ devices and will be followed for 5 years after device implant.

The objective of this safety and feasibility study is to assess whether the endocardial creation of electrically nonconductive lesions via PEF catheter ablation applied using the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Plus-PersAF is a feasible and safe treatment for PersAF and associated AFL