Safety of PENTAXIM® Given as a Three-Dose Primary Vaccination at 2, 3, and 4 Months of Age in Infants...
DiphtheriaTetanus2 moreThe study will assess the safety of Pentaxim® vaccine as a three-dose primary vaccination at 2, 3, and 4 months of age in order to meet the regulatory requirements for the license renewal as for any other product registered in China, and to generate additional clinical data using the three-dose primary vaccination schedule in some other Chinese provinces. Primary Objective To describe the safety after administration of PENTAXIM® at 2, 3, and 4 months of age in the study population.
Study of SP306 Given Intramuscularly Compared to DT Given Subcutaneously in Japanese Adolescents...
TetanusDiphtheria1 moreThe aim of the study is to generate additional safety and immunogenicity data to support the registration of the product in Japan. Primary objectives: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of SP306 versus DT (DT 0.1mL) vaccine in terms of diphtheria and tetanus booster response rate (proportion of subjects with booster responses) and seroprotection rate (percentage of subjects with antitoxin concentrations ≥0.1 IU/mL) at 28 days (window 28-35 days) after one injection in Japanese adolescents 11-12 years of age. To evaluate the immune response of SP306 against the pertussis antigens PT and FHA in terms of booster response rate (proportion of subjects with booster responses) at 28 days (window 28-35 days) after one injection in Japanese adolescents 11-12 years of age. Secondary objectives: To further evaluate the immune response of the study vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis antigens. To assess the safety of the study vaccines after one injection in Japanese adolescents 11-12 years of age.
Comparison of GSK Biologicals' Reduced Antigen Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis-...
TetanusDiphtheria1 moreThis study will assess the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the candidate GSK Biologicals' reduced antigen diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis- inactivated poliovirus vaccine when administered to healthy subjects aged ≥ 15 years in Germany and ≥ 18 years in France compared to Boostrix™ and inactivated poliovirus vaccine administered separately, and with Revaxis®
Non-inferiority of GSK Biologicals' DTPw-HBV/Hib Compared to Two Formulations of GSK Biologicals'...
Whole Cell PertussisHaemophilus Influenzae Type b3 moreThe purpose of this observer-blind study is to generate immunogenicity data with one formulation of GSK Biologicals' DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine after the primary vaccination course and to demonstrate non-inferiority of this vaccine as compared to two formulations of GSK Biologicals' DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine with respect to the anti-PRP antibody response. Additionally to assess the reactogenicity and safety of GSK Biologicals' DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine. The Protocol Posting has been updated in order to comply with the FDA Amendment Act, Sep 2007.
Safety and Immunogenicity of Tdap Vaccine Compared to DTaP Vaccine in Children 4 to 6 Years of Age...
TetanusDiphtheria1 moreCurrently, there is no 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine licensed for the 5th dose in US children aged 4 to 6 years.This study is aimed at providing evidence of sero-protection, booster response and safety of this formulation as a 5th dose. Primary Objective: - To compare the immune responses of Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine to Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine (all antigens) when each is administered as a 5th dose and given concurrently, to children aged 4 to 6 years. Secondary/Observational Objectives: To compare the immune responses for pertussis antigens of Tdap Vaccine to DTaP vaccine (for pertussis antigens) when each is administered as a 5th dose and given concurrently, to children aged 4 to 6 years. To present the long-term immunogenicity at 1-, 3-, and 5-years post-vaccination after each long-term follow-up. To describe the safety profile following vaccine administration.
Immune Responses in Adults to Revaccination With ADACEL® 10 Years After a Previous Dose
PertussisTetanus1 moreThe purpose of this study is to collect additional immunogenicity and safety data on re-dosing with Tdap vaccine (ADACEL®) in a continuing effort to address the public health need to establish broader population immunity against pertussis, as well as diphtheria and tetanus. Primary Objective: To assess immune response to Tdap vaccine (ADACEL®) one month after booster vaccination.
Phase IV Interchangeability Study of a Liquid Pentavalent Combination Vaccine
DiphtheriaTetanus3 moreThe objective of this study is to compare the Safety and Immunogenicity of a mixed sequence of 2 different pentavalent vaccines (Diphtheria-Tetanus- Pertussis, Hepatitis B and Hib combination Vaccines) with single sequence of Shan 5 in infants.
Concomitant Use of Gardasil (V501) (Human Papillomavirus [Types 6, 11, 16, 18] Recombinant Vaccine)...
NeoplasmsGlandular and Epithelial4 moreData from this study are expected to demonstrate that V501 (Human Papillomavirus (HPV) [Types 6, 11, 16, 18] Recombinant Vaccine) , when administered concomitantly with a combined diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (Tdap) vaccine and a meningococcal conjugate vaccine in adolescents remains immunogenic and well-tolerated and it does not impair the immunogenicity of the concomitant vaccines.
Immunogenicity Study of Antibody Persistence and Booster Effect of PENTAXIM™ at 18 Months in Healthy...
DiphtheriaTetanus3 moreThis study will assess both the antibody persistence of the investigational vaccine and the immune response and safety of a booster dose of PENTAXIM™ vaccine in 18 months-old toddlers who participated in an earlier study in order to determine if they are still protected before they receive a booster dose of D, T, IPV, pertussis or Hib vaccines and also to assess the quality of the induced immune memory in response to a booster dose of the same vaccine as in the primary series. Primary Objective: To describe the antibody persistence at 18 months of age and the booster effect of a dose of PENTAXIM™ on immunogenicity. Secondary objective: To describe the safety profile of the booster dose PENTAXIM™ in each vaccine group defined by the vaccines received during the primary series.
Study to Compare Pediacel® to Infanrix®-IPV+Hib When Both Are Co-Administered With Prevenar® in...
DiphtheriaTetanus3 moreThe purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of Pediacel® in infants and toddlers when given at 2,3,4 and 12-18 months of age. Primary Objectives: To compare the post-dose 3 immunogenicity of Pediacel® to Infanrix®-IPV+Hib when both are co-administered with Prevenar®. To describe the post-dose 3 pertussis antibody responses. Secondary Objectives: To compare the post-dose 4 immunogenicity of Pediacel® to Infanrix®-IPV+Hib when both are co-administered with Prevenar®. To describe the safety after each vaccination following co-administration with Prevenar®.