Active clinical trials for "Phobic Disorders"

Exposure-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (i.e., "exposure therapy"), which entails repeated and prolonged confrontation with feared situations/stimuli, is the most effective treatment for anxiety disorders (e.g., arachnophobia). Safety behaviors are actions performed to prevent, minimize, or escape a feared catastrophe and/or associated distress (e.g., wearing thick shoes or gloves when around areas where there might be spiders). It is understood that safety behaviors contribute to the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders; accordingly, patients' safety behaviors are traditionally eliminated as soon as possible during exposure therapy (i.e., "response prevention"). Unfortunately, not everyone who receives exposure therapy benefits from this approach. To address the limitations of exposure's effectiveness, some experts have questioned the clinical convention of response prevention during exposure therapy. Specifically, they propose the "judicious use of safety behaviors": the careful and strategic incorporation of safety behaviors during exposure therapy. The controversial role of permitting safety behaviors during exposure has garnered substantial research attention, yet study findings are mixed. The current study, therefore, was designed to improve upon the methodological limitations of previous related research and examine the relative efficacy of traditional exposure with response prevention (E/RP) and the experimental exposure with the judicious use of safety behaviors (E/JU) in a sample of adults with arachnophobia. In light of previous related research, several hypotheses were made regarding the short- (posttreatment) and long-term (1-month follow-up) treatment effects: Primary outcomes: E/RP participants will demonstrate greater improvement in spider phobia than the E/JU participants along behavioral and self-report symptom measures at follow-up. Secondary outcomes: Treatment acceptability and tolerability will be higher for E/JU participants, relative to E/RP participants, before beginning exposures and at posttreatment, but not at follow-up. In addition, hypothesize that E/RP participants will report greater reductions in peak distress and greater improvements in distress tolerance relative to E/JU participants at follow-up. Additional outcome: Exploratory analyses will be conducted to compare the relative rate of behavioral approach and exposure goal completion between treatment conditions.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether levels of sex hormones (including estrogen and progesterone) influence women's response to treatment for Specific Phobia of spiders. It is hypothesised that women will show less relapse of symptoms of spider phobia if they receive treatment during a period of high levels of sex hormones.

Patients with anxiety disorders oftentimes express fear responses to more than only one fear-inducing object. The principal aim of this study is to examine whether the beneficial effects of exposure on fear reduction in spider phobia can extend to stimuli which are conceptually similar to spiders (i.e. cockroaches), but have never been presented during the respective treatment.

The aims of this project are to determine the effectiveness of a time intensive form of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Specific Phobia of Vomiting (SPOV). Current research shows that this brief format can be effective in other specific phobias e.g. insects and animals. However, to date limited research has been conducted on the effectiveness of time intensive forms of CBT for SPOV. A single case experimental design will be used to analyse specific and idiosyncratic outcome measures in 6-8 cases of SPOV, referred to the Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma (CADAT) for treatment. Specifically, the project will explore the effectiveness of CBT delivered in a time-intensive format and imagery rescripting elements of the treatment. This initial study will provide important information about which elements of CBT are most effective at reducing targeted symptoms and whether symptom reduction can be achieved in a shorter number of sessions. It represents a crucial step before this format of CBT can be more rigorously evaluated and compared to other treatment approaches by Randomised Controlled Trial.

Primary objective: The purpose of this study is to examine efficacy and efficiency of a Stepped Care Program (SCP) for patients with Social Phobia in comparison to the standard cognitive therapy for Social Phobia according to D.M. Clark. Secondary objective: Further, it is intended to identify mechanisms of change which mediate treatment outcome and to identify differential predictors for therapy success for the two treatment conditions.

The research team hopes to use brain imaging and mental testing to learn more about specific phobias and the treatment of phobia. When given directly prior to therapy sessions, D-cycloserine has been shown to enhance the effects of therapy. This study hopes to identify reasons why D-cycloserine has this effect by measuring brain activity.

Social phobia is one of the most prevalent anxiety disorders in the western world. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the psychological treatment that has the largest empirical support. However, the availability to CBT is very limited in Sweden due to lack of therapists with proper training. Therefore it is important to evaluate alternative forms of treatment that are more time efficient. One of these methods is Internet based self-help therapy, which has proven to be an effective treatment for social phobia. To the investigator´s knowledge, no study has yet directly compared live-CBT to Internet therapy. The aim of the present study is to compare the effect of live CBT vs CBT delivered via the Internet. The study is considered to be an equivalence trial. 128 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment conditions. The primary outcome measure is Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS).

This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety in Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD)

Flying phobia (FP) is one of the most prevalent phobias in our society. However, not all patients benefit from in vivo exposure, given that an important amount of them do not accept the intervention, drop out when they are informed about the intervention procedure, or have problems accessing these therapies. The aim of the present study is to conduct a feasibility pilot with NO-FEAR Airlines ICBT (Campos et al., 2016) using two types of images in the exposure scenarios (still images vs 360º navigable images). A secondary aim is to explore the potential effectiveness of the two active treatment arms compared to a waiting list control group. Finally, we will explore the role of navigable images compared to the still images in the level of anxiety, sense of presence, and reality judgment in the exposure scenarios and whether the aforementioned variables mediate in treatment efficacy. Regarding the main aim of this study, we hypothesize that both treatment conditions will be well accepted by the participants, but participants will prefer 360º images over still images.

Anxiety is a common and impairing problem for children. The principle treatment for pediatric anxiety involves facing a child's fears in a stepwise approach through a therapeutic exercise called exposures. While exposures are effective, some feared situations cannot be confronted in a clinician's office (e.g., heights, public speaking, storms). This poses a logistical challenge in treatment that: (1) takes time away from patient care, (2) leads clinicians to rely on imagined exposures, and/or (3) requires families to complete exposures outside of the therapy visits. This creates a burden for clinicians and families, and impedes treatment success. Immersive virtual reality (VR) presents an innovative solution that allows children to face fears without leaving the clinician's office. While VR has been used to distract children during painful medical procedures, it has not been well examined as a primary treatment for pediatric anxiety. This study proposes to examine the effectiveness and acceptability of using immersive VR exposures to treat children and adolescents with specific phobias.