Active clinical trials for "Epilepsy, Reflex"

Background. Blue lenses that filter out red light have been proposed as a new therapeutic alternative for patients with PSE, such as the lens Zeiss Clarlet Z1. This lens only allows a small overall quantity of visible light, and particularly a minimum percentage of red light, to pass through. However, these characteristics entail two main pitfalls: reduced applicability in high- latitude regions and lack of transmission for the red and yellow colors. The latter would mainly expose patients to the other colors that compose the visible light, and particularly to the blue visible light. This exposure might be damaging for their eyes in the long term, as it has been reported in some studies. Aim. To determine whether four new lenses with different spectral characteristics are not inferior in efficacy to Z1 to reduce the PPRs in patients with PSE. Participants. Patients between 5-18 years with suspected or confirmed PSE, referred to the Neurophysiology Service at Birmingham Children's Hospital (BCH) for an EEG with IPS/pattern stimulation. Objectives & Outcomes: 1.A) Primary Objective: To evaluate the reduction/suppression produced by four new lenses in the PPRs shown by patients with PSE during an EEG with IPS/pattern stimulation, and compare it with the reduction provoked by the Z1 lens in the same individuals. B) Primary Outcome: reduction/suppression in both the PPR and the standardized photoparoxysmal response range (SPR) for IPS and pattern stimulation. A) Secondary Objectives: To obtain feedback from the patients who acquire a pair of our lenses regarding tolerability, overall adherence to treatment and improvement in the quality of life. Comparison of the reduction/suppression in the PPRs between our lenses and the Z1 lens in those retrospective patients with PSE seen between 2008-2017 at the Aston Brain Center. 2.B) Secondary Outcomes: Mean score obtained in adherence to treatment, tolerability, reduction in seizure frequency and autonomy according to the patient/parents or carers satisfaction questionnaires. Reduction/suppression in both the PPR and the standardized photoparoxysmal response range (SPR) for IPS and pattern stimulation in those patients recruited at the Aston Brain Center.

Sunflower Syndrome (also referred to as Self-induced Photosensitive Epilepsy) is a rare epileptic disorder characterized by a distinctive seizure that manifests itself in a highly stereotyped physical behavior. Seizure types associated with Sunflower Syndrome include absence seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Individuals with Sunflower Syndrome obsessively seek out a light source, stare at the light source, and wave one hand in front of their eye(s). Electroencephalogram (EEG) features include generalized spike and wave discharges interictally, and typically strong photoparoxysmal response during photic stimulation. Currently, Sunflower syndrome is poorly characterized in medical literature and is often misunderstood at the clinical level. The name self-induced photosensitive epilepsy may be a misnomer as research concerning the neurochemical and neuropsychological pathways cannot conclusively determine that it is self-induced (conscious behavior) as the name implies. Although some reports have concluded that the hand waiving induces the seizure, these findings are not consistent throughout scientific literature. In fact, an EEG report found that the seizures can begin simultaneously with the hand waving. This suggests that the hand waving may in fact be part of the seizure, not the cause. There are no treatments specifically approved for the treatment of Sunflower Syndrome in the United States. Broad spectrum anticonvulsant medications, including sodium valproate, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and clobazam, have not shown full efficacy in seizure prevention in patients with Sunflower Syndrome. Accordingly, there remains a significant unmet need for an approved treatment for children and adults with Sunflower Syndrome. Because this epilepsy typically does not respond to anticonvulsant medications, and because Aicardi described the successful treatment with fenfluramine of at least one child with this syndrome, the investigators of this study will investigate if fenfluramine is an effective, safe and well tolerated treatment for Sunflower Syndrome. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy of ZX008 on seizure frequency in children and young adults with Sunflower Syndrome. The goal of treatment is to provide a 30 percent or greater reduction of generalized tonic-clonic seizures and/or hand waving associated with absence seizures. Secondary objectives of the study include evaluation of the effect of ZX008 (fenfluramine hydrochloride) on EEG patterns and quality of life. Patients with Sunflower Syndrome often experience low self-esteem, bullying due to the unusual motor movements associated with their seizures, school performance issues, anxiety, and depression. The study population will include pediatric and young adult patients seen by Elizabeth A. Thiele, M.D., Ph.D. at MGH's Pediatric Epilepsy Clinic who were identified as candidates. The Principal Investigator (PI) will follow up to 20 patients with Sunflower Syndrome who will be taking ZX008.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate RLS103 for safety and suppression of the epileptic photoparoxysmal response compared to placebo.

The primary purpose of the study is to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of E2730 as measured by suppression of epileptic photoparoxysmal response (PPR) in the participant's most sensitive eye condition in participants with photosensitive epilepsy.

The primary purpose of the study is to assess pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of E2082 as measured by suppression of epileptic photoparoxysmal response (PPR) in the participant's most sensitive eye condition in participants with photosensitive epilepsy, compared to placebo.

The purpose of this study is to check the Effects of JNJ-26489112 on the Photic Induced Paroxysmal electroencephalogram (EEG) Response in Patients with Photosensitive Epilepsy.

The main purpose of this study is to see whether brivaracetam has a faster onset time and greater effect than levetiracetam in subjects with photosensitive seizures. Part 1 of the study will compare the effects of levetiracetam 1500 mg with the effects of brivaracetam 100 mg. Part 2, will compare the effects of levetiracetam 1500 mg with the effects of brivaracetam 100 mg or will compare the effects of levetiracetam 500mg with the effects of brivaracetam 25 mg.

This study will evaluate the efficacy of BGG492 in reducing the sensitivity to flashing lights of patients with photosensitive epilepsy, using EEG as a readout.

We are trying to learn if small changes in the amount of a valproate in the blood (given through an IV) will change the way the brain reacts to flashing lights.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether patients who usually have abnormal electrical EEG responses when shown flashing lights will show a reduction in abnormal electrical activity when they take a single dose of 2 marketed drugs (carbamazepine and levetiracetam). If so, a similar study in the future may be able to identify promising new drugs for epilepsy. Patients who successfully complete the screening visit, will return 4 additional times and will receive either placebo (2 times) or a single oral dose of both carbamazepine 400mg and levetiracetam 1000mg in random order. During each of the study days, several procedures and intermittent photosensitivity (IPS) assessments will be performed at 5 pre-determined times over the course of the day, one pre-dose and 4 post-dose.