Active clinical trials for "Foot Ulcer"

The study will compare treatment with DermACELL to conventional care in diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and venous stasis ulcers (VSU).

The primary objective of the present study is to further establish in a randomized controlled trial, the safety and efficacy of weekly Grafix® administration versus control in patients with chronic diabetic foot ulcers. The primary endpoint is complete wound closure of the index wound, defined as 100% re-epithelialization as determined by the Investigator. Grafix® is a product regulated for use in the US by the FDA as a Human Cellular and Tissue Based Product (HCT/P) under Title 21 CFR Part 1271.

Diabetic foot (DF) is a common, severe and costly complication of diabetes. DF is underlied by neuropathy, atherosclerosis of distal arteries and infection, which result in tissue ulcers and necrosis. Alterations in microcirculatory function and in blood rheology may concur in causing tissue damage. In recent years there has been accumulating evidence that LDL apheresis (LA) does not only reduce cholesterol but also has a series of pleiotropic effects that improve the microcirculation, increasing peripheral tissue perfusion. HADIF is a randomized, multicentric, prospective clinical study aimed at assessing the effect of LDL apheresis treatment in association with traditional therapy for ulcers, in patients with an ischemic diabetic foot ulcer (class I and II Texas Wound Classification System)and peripheral vasculopathy not susceptible to revascularization. A total of 132 patients will be enrolled. Participants will be centrally randomized to receive traditional therapy alone (TT) or in association with LA. TT includes standard medication of ulcers, antiaggregant therapy and statins. LA will be performed with HELP system, for a total of 10 sessions in 9 weeks. The primary end-point of the study is ulcer healing; secondary endpoints include improvements of peripheral oxygenation, resolution of pain, reduction of circulating inflammatory markers, cardiovascular events during one year's follow-up. This clinical Study has been approved by local EC on 25 may 2011 (Study number 1953). TO BE NOTED: since diabetic patients in our "Diabetic-Foot UNIT" often presented foot ulcers more severe than class II Texas, a formal amendment has been submitted to EC for recruiting patients with diabetic foot ulcer of class III Texas. The amendment was already approved on 5 may 2012.

The purpose of this study was to determine if insoles with removable pegs could effectively reduce the plantar aspect pressure with the aid of in-shoe plantar pressure analysis for guidance of peg removal.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MEBO in the treatment of subjects with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

Aim 1. To compare the effectiveness of total contact casts (TCC), removable cast walkers (RCW) and instant total contact casts (ITCC) to heal diabetic foot ulcers in a 20 week randomized clinical trial of 225 patients in community care in three university medical center diabetes clinics. Aim 2. To compare the frequency of complications such as soft tissue and bone infections, iatrogenic wounds, falls and fall related injuries, and amputations among patients treated with TCC, ITCC and RCW to heal diabetic foot ulcers. Aim 3. To compare patient compliance and level of activity among TCC, ITCC, RCW treatment groups. Using computerized activity monitors which time-stamp each step, we will evaluate both degree and magnitude of activity between groups. Aim 4. To evaluate the cost of diabetic foot ulcer-related treatment and complications during the course of therapy.

On behalf of a consortium of 19 health insurance companies the Institute for Research in Operative Medicine as part of the University of Witten / Herdecke gGmbH is planning and conducting a clinical study evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wound healing disorders of the foot, which are caused by diabetes mellitus. This german multicenter study is due to evaluate whether the negative pressure wound therapy or the control therapy (standard wound therapy following the guidelines) is superior. Patients will be randomly assigned to the two study arms. Both patients and the treatment staff know about the specific allocation to the negative pressure wound therapy or standard wound therapy arm. A photo documentation and a computer-based evaluation of the wound images will be performed. This is done centrally by independent examiners, who don't know neither the patient nor the treatment assignment. It is believed that the application of the negative pressure wound therapy systems compared to standard therapy of diabetic foot wounds will lead more frequent and more rapid to the achievement of complete wound closure and that the use of negative pressure wound therapy is an effective and safe therapy option for the treatment of diabetic foot wounds in inpatient and outpatient care. Patient´s to be included into the study should have either a chronic diabetic foot wound existing longer than 4 weeks whereas dead tissue components must be completely removed by the doctor or a wound after amputation of foot parts. The study treatment may have already started in the hospital if applicable. The further wound treatment will be mainly performed within outpatient care. Study Participants will return to the study centre for regular study visits or even for wound treatment. The comparison of the outcomes of both study arms will give valuable information about the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in inpatient as well as outpatient care. These results should be provided until the end of 2016 as a basis for the decision of the Federal Joint Committee to answer the question if the negative pressure wound therapy can be approved as a standard service for reimbursement by health insurance companies.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety of the RedDress Wound Care System (RD1) in patients Texas 1a or 2a Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Pirfenidone is a synthetic molecule, which acts as a potent modulator of the effect of various cytokines (TNF-α, transforming growth factor-β, platelet derived growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor, among others) that possesses anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrinolytic properties. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of topic treatment with pirfenidone compared to conventional treatment in chronic diabetic foot ulcers. The hypothesis is that treatment with topic pirfenidone in chronic diabetic foot ulcers (Wagner 1 to 2) reduces the ulcer size and shortens the healing time compared to conventional treatment. This is a randomized, controlled and crossover study. Patients will be randomly assigned to conventional treatment or topic pirfenidone for eight weeks. At the end of this period they will change groups. Each week ulcers will be for size, depth, length and evidence of infection. The ulcers will have proper debridement in the conventional treatment group and debridement plus topical pirfenidone application in the pirfenidone group. Subjects will be instructed to do daily ulcer cleansing and for those in the topical pirfenidone group, in addition to cleansing they will be instructed to apply the gel twice a day.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the percentage of patients with complete diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) closure following up to 12 weeks of treatment with either dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM) plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone.