A Study of Comparing Talquetamab to Belantamab Mafodotin in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory...
Relapsed/ Refractory Multiple MyelomaThe purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of talquetamab versus belantamab mafodotin in terms of overall response rate (ORR) or progression-free survival (PFS).
Study of Combination POM, BTZ, Low-Dose DEX, and DARA (PVD-DARA) in Patients With RRMM
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple MyelomaThis phase II clinical trial design with a safety run-in period will be used to assess the rate of VGPR or better for the combination PVD-Dara in the treatment of RRMM.
Pembrolizumab Cyclophosphamide and Lenalidomide for Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma
Myeloma MultipleThis is a multi-centre phase I/II trial with an initial dose finding phase for cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combined with fixed dose pembrolizumab for patients with relapsed or relapsed / refractory multiple myeloma (MM) that have had at least 1 prior line of therapy
Apixaban for Primary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
Venous ThromboembolismMultiple MyelomaPatients living with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to the disease itself and the use of targeted therapies, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Prevention of VTE has become a major management challenge during MM treatment. There is a paucity of data with respect to the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the cancer population. However, the NOACs offer comparable efficacy but improved safety compared with warfarin. Apixaban has shown excellent safety and efficacy for treatment and prevention of recurrent VTE (1,2). The safety and efficacy of apixaban for primary prevention of VTE in MM patients has not been established. Aim #1: To quantify the 6-month rate of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding in MM patients receiving IMiDs who are prescribed apixaban 2.5 mg orally twice daily for primary prevention of VTE. Hypothesis #1: The 6-month rate of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding in MM patients receiving IMiDs who are prescribed apixaban 2.5 mg orally twice daily for primary prevention of VTE will be ≤3% (2). Although the MM population, in general, has a higher medical acuity than that of the previous large randomized controlled trials of apixaban, we will be selecting a stable population of MM patients who are appropriate for immunomodulatory therapy. Aim #2: To quantify 6-month rate of symptomatic VTE in MM patients receiving IMiDs who are prescribed apixaban 2.5 mg orally twice daily for primary prevention of VTE. Hypothesis #2: The 6-month rate of symptomatic VTE in MM patients receiving IMiDs who are prescribed apixaban 2.5 mg orally twice daily for primary prevention of VTE will be <7% (3). Although additional therapies for MM such as dexamethasone and erythropoietin-stimulating agents may further increase the risk of VTE, the rate of incident VTE should be reduced to <7% with apixaban.
Selinexor, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo, Carfilzomib, and Dexamethasone in Multiple...
Multiple MyelomaDouble-blind study will compare the efficacy and assess safety of selinexor plus carfilzomib (Kyprolis®) plus low-dose dexamethasone versus placebo plus carfilzomib plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Bendamustine Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma
Multiple MyelomaPlasma Cell LeukemiaThis phase I trial studies the side effects and best dose of bendamustine hydrochloride in treating patients with previously treated multiple myeloma. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as bendamustine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading.
Study of Selinexor (KPT- 330), Lenalidomide, & Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma...
Multiple MyelomaThis is an open-label, randomized clinical study with two stages to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy, and safety of selinexor, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (SLd) in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). The stages are dose escalation (Phase 1) and expansion (Phase 2).
Continuous Lenalidomide Therapy Versus Observation Following Induction Without Lenalidomide, Pomalidomide...
Multiple MyelomaNeoplasms5 moreThe purpose of this study is to see how long lenalidomide therapy can maintain or improve the disease response obtained after induction therapy that does not include lenalidomide, pomalidomide or thalidomide; and consequently reduce worsening of disease and to evaluate the activity of lenalidomide. Patients will receive lenalidomide or be under observation. All patients will attend regular clinic visits to evaluate their disease and health. Patients will have the option to participate in additional biomarker correlative studies in addition to their participation in the main study.
UARK 2014-08 A Phase II Open-Label, Multiple-Dose, Single Agent Study to Evaluate the Overall Response...
Multiple MyelomaThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the overall response rate of Trametinib when administered orally to patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
Whole Body Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) in Multiple Myeloma
Multiple MyelomaBone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) is routinely assessed by skeletal X-ray (XR) and magnetic resonance of the spine (S-MRI). Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is a functional MRI that detects water diffusion through cells. This prospective phase II study compared whole-body DW-MRI with XR and S-MRI for the assessment of MM bone lesions. METHODS. Thirty-six consecutive symptomatic patients at diagnosis or at relapse performed XR, S-MRI, whole-body MRI, and whole-body DW-MRI before treatment, after treatment, and 6 months after treatment. A substudy evaluated 12 asymptomatic patients at diagnosis, after 6 and 12 months. Radiology exams were independently read by 3 experienced radiologists, and the techniques were compared by the count of segments with focal lesions (FL) (>=5mm).