Active clinical trials for "Malaria, Falciparum"

This is an open label, randomized, controlled clinical trial. The primary aim of this project is to determine the safety and tolerability of NF135.C10 sporozoite immunization under chemoprophylaxis against homologous and heterologous challenge infection.

The purpose of this study is to compare the gametocytocidal and transmission reducing activity of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) with and without a single dose of 0.25mg/kg primaquine (PQ) and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine with amodiaquine (SPAQ) with and without single dose of 1.66mg/kg tafenoquine (TQ). Outcome measures will include infectivity to mosquitoes at 2, 5 and 7 days after treatment, gametocyte density throughout follow-up, and safety measures including haemoglobin density and the frequency of adverse events.

Background: Malaria by P falciparum is a public health problem in more than 100 municipalities of Colombia. The country is using the artemether+lumefantrine (AM+L) fixed combination for uncomplicated P falciparum malaria but it is ideal to have different types of formulations with similar efficacy that may be used in diverse circumstances. One alternative of treatment is using preparations containing artesunate and amodiaquine (AS+AQ) in fixed combination, which can be given in a simpler dosing regimen. In order to assess the efficacy of that combination in an area with suspected risk of resistance to amodiaquine an open controlled clinical trial was carried out in Colombia. Methods: The study was done in Choco, a high endemic area for malaria by P falciparum, from August 2008 and September 2009. Patients diagnosed with uncomplicated malaria (n=210) malaria were randomized in two arms, one receiving AS+AQ and the other AM+L. The main clinical results was parasitological cure, i.e. a negative blood smears, that was assessed, for both groups, at days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after the onset of treatment. Results: There were no losses at follow up. The mean age of the enrolled study subjects was of 37.5 years without differences between study arms. Both therapies were very well tolerated in general. The efficacy for AS+AQ was 100%, and 99% for AM+L (p>0.1). In average, patients in the AS+AQ arm became negative for P falciparum parasites and gametocytes earlier than those at the AM+L arm. Blood smears became negative after one day of treatment with AS+AQ and after two days of treatment with AM+L. Gametocytes disappeared after 2 days of treatment in the AS+AQ arm compared to 4 days in the AM+L arm. Conclusions: In this study, the efficacy of the AS+AQ combination was similar to that of the AM+L. This finding do not support the hypothesis that there is a level of resistance to amodiaquine that prevents its use combined with artemisinin derived.

The study is to be performed in public health facilities in Central and West Africa where Pyramax will be used as treatment of uncomplicated malaria episodes, including repeat episodes. The study is to assess the safety of Pyramax, particularly in patients with underlying liver function abnormalities, in patients who have co-morbid conditions, such as HIV, and also in very small children (<1 year of age).

This study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of community-based mass screening with a malaria rapid diagnostic test, and treatment of participants with positive tests with an appropriate antimalarial for reducing malaria transmission indices.

This study was designed to determine the most effective and tolerable dose at the shortest dosing regimen of the investigational drug KAF156 in combination with a solid dispersion formulation of lumefantrine (LUM-SDF) in adult/adolescent and pediatric patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. There is unmet medical need for anti-malarial treatment with new mechanism of action to reduce probability of developing resistance, and for duration shorter than 3 days of treatment and/or reduced pill burden.

This study is a multi-centre, open-label randomised trial to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the Triple ACT artemether-lumefantrine+amodiaquine (AL+AQ) compared to the ACT artemether-lumefantrine (AL) in uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Cambodia and Vietnam. The estimated total sample size is 600 patients from 2 sites in Cambodia and 2 sites in Vietnam. There are 2 treatment arms Arm 1: Artemether-lumefantrine for 3 days Arm 2: Artemether-lumefantrine for 3 days plus Amodiaquine for 3 days. According to the World Health Organization guideline, all patients except children under 10 kilograms will also be treated with a single dose of primaquine as a gametocytocidal treatment. Funder :Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) Grant reference number: OPP1132628

This project will determine the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) of an extended artemether-lumefantrine (AL) dosing regimen in HIV-infected children on efavirenz (EFV)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) that is designed to improve the PK exposure and treatment efficacy of this artemisinins-based combination therapy (ACT) regimen. Our overarching goal is to inform the best treatment guidelines for young children in Africa. HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected children will be enrolled for intensive PK studies, as well as additional children for population PK studies to enhance association analyses with clinical outcomes.

This clinical trial evaluates the advantage of prolonging the therapeutic life span of Artemether-lumefantrine from 3 days to 6 days, and addition of single low dose of Primaquine 0.25mg/kg. The study will have two arms, one that will receive standard treatment of uncomplicated malaria with Artemether-lumefantrine, and the other arm will receive the prolonged dose of 6 days together with single low dose primaquine. This approach is expected to provide strategies for malaria control in an era of imminent Plasmodium falciparum resistance.

Because the artemisinins are the most potent antimalarial drugs, the reduction in parasite numbers is rapid. Therefore, early measures of reducing parasite counts are needed. This study will look at conventional markers of parasite reduction e.g. parasite clearance time, parasite reduction ratio, and the time to achieve a fall of 50%, 90% and 99% of the pre-treatment parasitaemia. Defining artemisinin resistance requires the use of artesunate (AS) alone because it is now appreciated that the partner drug in a combination treatment has a significant impact on the rate of parasite clearance. This study will dose patients for 3 days with AS alone (or longer until parasites clear) and measure the parasite count frequently in order to be able to define an accurate regression line of a graph of the natural logarithm of the parasite count (Y axis) versus time (X axis). This will be followed by a full course of an artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). Two different dose regimens of artesunate will be compared at all sites except those in western Cambodia, as unpublished observations from the Thai-Myanmar border suggest the standard lower daily dose of 2mg/kg may enable the earlier detection of low level resistance than a 4mg/kg daily dose.