Active clinical trials for "Pneumonia, Pneumococcal"

Purpose: To study the immune response of the newly licensed pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) in comparison to the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) to determine if a significantly better immunologic response to boosting can be elicited in patients previously vaccinated with PPV.

In this Phase I clinical study, three recombinant, avirulent Salmonella Typhi (RASV) strains each expressing the Streptococcus pneumoniae surface protein, PspA, will be compared as live biological vaccine vectors to evaluate safe and tolerable, single, oral dose levels in adult subjects.

Hypothesis: The "novo" cardiovascular events (CVE)in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are frequent (17%) and could be associated with both direct pneumococcal myocardial invasion, toxin delivery (pneumolysin) or different biomarkers (histones, NETs(neutrophil extracellular traps), IL (Interleukin)-1b,h-Fabp (heart-Fatty acid bindding protein) ).The CVE frequency and its impact on outcome in patients without prior heart disease (CP) has not been studied. Objectives:1) To determine the incidence of myocardian injury (MI) and CVE in patients with CAP without CP evaluated by non-invasive techniques (Echocardiograph and MRI) and biomarkers levels (Tn-I (Troponin I), h-Fabp, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) histones, NETs, IL 1b); 2) To assess if DMA and CVE are related to the etiology and their impact on outcome , 3) To investigate the presence of myocardial scarring by MRI and its relationship with etiology and MI, and 4) To identify prognostic factors of DMA and CVE to determine level of risk.

The goals of the study are to determine the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination rate in patients with diabetes before and after community pharmacist education and intervention. Assess barriers of receiving the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in patients with diabetes after pharmacist education in a supermarket chain setting

To compare the relative immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the existing 23 valent plain pneumococcal vaccine and a 7 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in healthy UK adults aged 50-80 years, and subsequent antibody persistence and response to boosting.

This is a study to evaluate an alternative booster for pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV) for children at 12 months of age. Currently in the UK, 3 doses of a vaccine called Prevenar 13 (PCV-13), which contains 13 pneumococcal serotypes attached to a carrier protein called CRM197, are given to children at 2, 4 and 12 months of age. There is some evidence that a vaccine called Synflorix (PHiD-CV) may be at least as good as the currently used vaccine when used as an alternative vaccine at 12 months of age. Although PHiD-CV contains only 10 serotypes, there is evidence that it generates cross-reactive antibodies against two of the three additional serotypes included in PCV-13 which might be enough to protect children against disease caused by these two serotypes. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that PHiD-CV confers protection against a common otitis media pathogen in children called nontypeable H. influenzae (NTHi) by attachment to a carrier protein called Protein D, which is derived from NTHi. In addition, the use of a carrier protein, which is not closely related to an antigen included in any coadministered or previously administered routine vaccine minimises the risk of interference related to it. The investigators aim to recruit 168 healthy children at the age of 12 months who have already received two doses of PCV-13 according to the UK routine immunisation schedule at 2 and 4 months of age. Participants will then be randomised to receive a booster dose of either PCV-13 or PHiD-CV at 12 months of age. Three visits will take place at their parents' home and will involve a blood test followed by a dose of PCV-13 or PHiD-CV on visit 1, and a blood test on each of the visits 2 (1 month after visit 1) and 3 (1 year after visit 1).

The purpose of this study is to determine if a Streptococcus pneumoniae Whole Cell Vaccine (SPWCV) given with alum is safe and well tolerated by healthy adults.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the intestinal microbiota influences rotavirus vaccine immune responses in healthy adult volunteers.

The immunogenicity of simultaneous administration of quadrivalent influenza vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine was unknown. The purpose of present study is to compare the immunogenicity of simultaneous administration of influenza vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine with that of separate administration.

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an important health problem with significant morbidity, mortality and cost. The most identified pathogen in CAP is Streptococcus pneumoniae. This was also the causative agent most frequently found in the Ovidius and Triple-P study, two consecutive clinical trials initiated by the St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein. Diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia can be based on positive blood cultures, sputum cultures, urine antigen testing or a serotype specific antibody response. When pneumococcal pneumonia is diagnosed by a positive culture, a matching serotype specific antibody response is expected. However not all patients in the Ovidius and Triple-P study with a culture proven pneumococcal pneumonia showed an antibody response against the infecting pneumococcal serotype. Patients who survived pneumococcal pneumonia are considered as a high-risk population for pneumococcal disease in the future. Possibly these patients have an impaired immune response against S. pneumoniae. In this study, pneumococcal vaccination of patients with S. pneumoniae CAP in the past enables investigating their immune response after vaccination compared to patients with CAP due another causative agent. Furthermore this study provides information to determine if there is a difference in vaccination response between pneumococcal pneumonia patients who had a culture matching serotype specific antibody response and between pneumococcal pneumonia patients who failed to elicit this response previously. Possibly these latter patients had a temporarily low titre due to the infection but another explanation is that there might be a structurally impaired immune response against S. pneumoniae or certain serotypes.