Active clinical trials for "Pneumonia"

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is an emerging respiratory virus that causes pneumonia. WHO data reported admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for 6% of patients, with a mortality rate reaching 45%. To date, apart from therapeutic trials, ICU management is symptomatic, based on organ failure support therapies. In the initial phase, the therapeutic management also includes empiric antimicrobial therapy (90% of patients, in accordance with LRTI guidelines (ATS 2019) and SRLF Guidelines (2020). One challenge for the ICU physicians is the timing for discontinuation of antimicrobial treatment, especially in case of shock or ARDS, considering that a substantial proportion of COVID-19 pneumonia patients may have pulmonary bacterial coinfection/superinfection. In order to avoid unnecessary prolonged antimicrobial therapy, and subsequent selective pressure, two tests could be combined in a personalized antibiotic strategy: Procalcitonin (PCT): PCT is a useful tool to guide antibiotics discontinuation in community-acquired pneumonia) and viral pneumonia (PMID24612487). Respiratory multiplex PCR FA-PPP (Biomérieux®): panel has been enlarged, including 8 viruses and 18 bacteria (quantitative analysis). The turnaround time is short. Sensitivity is high (99%, PMID32179139). It may contribute, in combination with conventional tests, to accelerate and improve the microbiological diagnosis during severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The hypothesize of the study is that the combination of the mPCR FA-PPP and PCT could be used to reduce antibiotics exposure in patients with severe confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia, with a higher clinical efficacy and safety as compared with a conventional strategy.

Phase II, prospective, interventional, single-arm, multicentric, open label trial, with a parallel retrospective collection of data on not treated patients from IRCCS, San Raffaele Scientific Institute included in the institutional observational study. A sample of 50 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia will allow to detect an absolute reduction in the rate of Respiratory-failure at day+14 after treatment of 20%, assuming that the actual rate of failure in the corresponding not treated patients is 70% (alpha=5%, power=90%, two-sided test). The software PASS15 was used for calculations. The study will also include a parallel retrospective group of temporally concomitant patients from IRCCS, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, who did not receive an experimental treatment and who are enrolled in an already IRB approved observational study

Study Objectives: Primary To assess the efficacy (survival without organ failure on Day 14) of three doses of rhu-pGSN administered intravenously (IV) plus standard of care (SOC) to hospitalized subjects with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and a severity score of 4, 5 or 6 on the World Health Organization (WHO) 9-point severity scale To evaluate the safety and tolerability of three IV doses of rhu-pGSN administered to hospitalized subjects with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and a severity score of 4, 5, or 6 on the WHO 9-point severity scale Secondary To further assess the efficacy of IV administered rhu-pGSN To assess changes in WHO 9-point severity score for SOC with or without rhu-pGSN To evaluate the effect of administered rhu-pGSN on survival rates To assess the relationship of pGSN levels (and other biomarkers) at baseline with clinical outcomes [OPTIONAL] To follow the pharmacokinetics (PK) of administered rhu-pGSN Immunogenicity • To investigate the development of antibodies against rhu-pGSN post-treatment

This is a compassionate use, proof of concept, phase IIb, prospective, interventional, pilot study in which the investigators will evaluate the effects of compassionate-use treatment with IV tirofiban 25 mcg/kg, associated with acetylsalicylic acid IV, clopidogrel PO and fondaparinux 2.5 mg s/c, in patients affected by severe respiratory failure in Covid-19 associated pneumonia who underwent treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Community-acquired Pneumonia (CAP) represents the single largest cause of death and morbidity in children worldwide (1). Respiratory viruses are the most common cause of CAP in preschool children, followed by bacteria. The atypical bacteria Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae are common causes of pneumonia in children >5 years. The identification of the causal agent is pivotal, especially in children who require hospital admission, as it guides the choice of appropriate treatment. However, the microbial diagnosis of CAP in children is not easy to establish without invasive procedures, and chest X-Ray has failed to identify the aetiology of CAP. Clinical features of bacterial pneumonia, atypical bacterial pneumonia or viral pneumonia frequently overlap and cannot be used reliably to distinguish between the various aetiologies, as well as blood tests like white blood cell, C-reactive protein, including the more recently introduced serum procalcitonin (85% sensitivity and 45% specificity in identifying children without typical bacterial CAP. As a consequence, children with CAP usually receive unnecessary empirical antibiotics, contributing to the spread of antibiotic resistance or to side effects. Therefore, new methods, possibly fast, non- invasive and easily accessible in the outpatient settings (point-of-care) to optimize and personalize the management of children with suspected CAP are urgently needed Specific aim 1 To perform a clinical prospective study aimed to evaluate clinical, laboratory, microbiolical and outcomes data and to define LUS patterns (ultrasonomic) in children with CAP of different aetiologies: (viral, bacterial and atypical CAP) in different italian regions (Lazio, Puglia). Specific Aim 2 Development and validation of multi-factorial prediction models for the personalized diagnosis and management of paediatric CAP and building of a Decision Support System (DSS) based on validated prediction models that will be build based on the collection of "ultrasonomic", clinical, laboratory, treatments, outcomes and microbiological data collected from all partners. In particular, we will: i) develop, validate, and improve prediction models for the prediction of aetiology, outcome and treatment response; ii) take advantage of prediction models to better inform patients/caregivers on the risks and benefits of the proposed treatments; iii) use the outcome of the prediction models to individualize the management

This study aims at determining whether diaphragm ultrasound examining diaphragm thickening fraction, excursion and density before and after surgery can predict respiratory complications in the postoperative period. Patients scheduled for major elective abdominal, pelvic or vascular surgery will be included in the study and diaphragm ultrasound is performed before surgery and after surgery in the postoperative ward. Physiological parameters, laboratory parameters, data on surgery and anesthesia and comorbidities will be registered. Complications such as pneumonia, desaturation, need for intubation and other respiratory events up to 30 days will be registered and later correlated with the diaphragm measurements.

Aim of the study : Efficacy of Sono pulmonary infection score in combination with APACHE score in early diagnosis of VAP Assessment of prediction role of combined SIPS SCORE and APACHE SCORE of outcome of VAP patient in RICU Assessments of role of ultrasonography in early diagnosis and follow up of VAP

The researchers aim to compare different algorithms to predict postoperative pneumonia in elderly patients and to assess the risk of pneumonia in elderly patients.

Study to Determine the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Oral Nafithromycin Versus Oral Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) in Adults

The investigators propose a home hospital model of care that substitutes for treatment in an acute care hospital. Limited studies of the home hospital model have demonstrated that a sizeable proportion of acute care can be delivered in the home with equal quality and safety, reduced cost, and improved patient experience.