Active clinical trials for "Pneumothorax"

The exact pathogenesis of PSP is controversial. A few theories has been proposed contributing to the pathogenesity of the PSP as emphysematous like changes (ELCs) which lead to the formation and rupture of the lung bullae or blebs; and increased pleural porosity which is an abnormality of the visceral pleura. The Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with bullectomy only is an effective preventive method of PSP recurrence. Adding mechanical pleurodesis to bullectomy is still questionable in the literature. This prospective multicenter study will identify the rate of PSP recurrence after thoracoscopic bullectomy only versus thoracoscopic bullectomy with mechanical pleurodesis.

Primary spontaneous pneumothorax usually occurs in young, lean male without underlying lung disease. In most cases, the cause of pneumothorax is rupture of blebs at the apex of the lung. Traditionally, bullectomy with mechanical pleurodesis through thoracotomy is indicated in patients with recurrence or persisted air leakage. In recent years, thoracoscopic bullectomy with pleural abrasion is getting popular, thanks for the advance of endoscopic instruments and technique. The pneumothorax recurrence rate after thoracoscopic surgery is around 10%, which is significantly higher than that of thoracotomy. In addition, the rate of postoperative prolonged air leakage is 5-8%. The possible causes of recurrent pneumothorax and prolonged air leakage are missed bleb surrounding the endoscopic suture line or suboptimal suturing or healing of the thoracoscopic suture. To prevent these complications, a novel method using coverage of the endoscopic suture line by a large absorbable mesh during thoracoscopic surgery was proved to be safe and feasible. Theoretically, the mesh can strengthen the suture line and induce local fibrosis surrounding the suture line, and reduce the rate of recurrent pneumothorax and prolonged air leakage. To prove this hypothesis, the investigators are conducting a prospective randomized trial in National Taiwan University Hospital. The investigators will enroll 204 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax who will be randomly assigned to additional mesh pleurodesis (mesh group, 102 patients) or not (control group, 102 patients) after thoracoscopic bullectomy and pleural abrasion. The primary endpoint is to compare the rate of pneumothorax recurrence within one year between the two groups. The secondary endpoints are to compare the safety, efficacy, and long-term pulmonary function between the two groups.

The estimated recurrence rate of primary spontaneous pneumothorax is 23-50% after the first episode, and the optimal treatment remains unknown. In the recently published British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines, simple aspiration is recommended as first line treatment for all primary pneumothoraces requiring intervention. However, the 1 year recurrence rate of this procedure was as high as 25-30%, making it inappropriate as a standard of care. Intrapleural instillation of a chemical irritant (chemical pleurodesis) is an effective way to shorten the duration of air leaks and reduce the rates of recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax in surgical and non-surgical patients. Many chemical irritants (tetracycline, talc, and minocycline) have been used to decrease the rate of recurrence in spontaneous pneumothorax. Tetracycline, which was the most commonly used irritant, is no longer available. Talc insufflation of the pleural cavity is safe and effective for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. However, it should be applied either with surgical or medical thoracoscopy. Minocycline, a derivative of tetracycline, is as effective as tetracycline in inducing pleural fibrosis in rabbits. In the previous studies, we have shown that additional minocycline pleurodesis is a safe and convenient procedure to decrease the rates of ipsilateral recurrence after thoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. In the present study, additional minocycline pleurodesis will be randomly administered in patients with first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax after simple aspiration to test if it can reduce the rate of recurrence.

Optimal surgical management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax has been a matter of devate, especially regarding the method of pleurodesis. Previous studies have shown that thoracoscopic apical pleurectomy is a reliable method with a very low incidence of recurrence. However, this procedure is more technical demanding and time consuming through thoracoscopy. In addition, a more extensive pleural injury may cause impaired pulmonary function and a higher risk of perioperative complication such as hemothorax. In our previous studies, we have shown that thoracoscopic pleural abrasion with minocycline instillation is an easy and convinent method of pleurodesis which decreases the rate of recurrence without affecting pulmonary function. In this study, we hypothesized that pleural abrasion with minocycline instillation is as effective as apical pleurectomy in preventing pneumothorax recurrence while the short-term and long-term complications are less.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether injecting autologous blood or putting bronchial plug through bronchoscope is effective in the treatment of refractory pneumothorax.

Lung cancer is the deadliest of all cancers, and its incidence is on the rise. The importance of accurate and efficient lung biopsy without complications will only increase in importance going forward. Pneumothorax is a common complication of CT-guided lung biopsy. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of using Gelfoam slurry in preventing pneumothorax from lung biopsy in a randomized controlled trial. Gelfoam (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) is gelatin product approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for hemostasis during various procedures. In the study group, the needle track will be laced with Gelfoam slurry following biopsy, and will be compared to standard lung biopsy without any other interventions. Both groups will be followed up with chest x-ray for pneumothorax.

the different surgical management in patients with primary pneumothorax 0 Objective 1: Identify risk factors that are predictive of the need for surgical intervention. Objective 2: Determine the value of management strategies in terms of hospital stay Objective 3: Assess outcomes and postoperative results including symptom relive ,or recurrence or post-operative complications .

The study will be carried out by the principal investigator and his team at the Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery of the Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan and the University College Hospital, Ibadan (UCH), which is the Teaching Hospital of the Medical College.The study sets out to prospectively compare the early and long-term outcomes between the use of purse-string (suturing U-technique) and Un-reapproximated thoracostomy wound edges (Occlusive adhesive-absorbent dressing application) at the time of removal of thoracostomy tube drain in patients who have had chest tube insertion.

To compare between small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube for the fear of obstruction (in hemomothorax) or ineffective drainage (in hemothorax, pneumothorax or hemo-pneumothorax) ,pain score or repositioning and need for thoracotomy.

Spontaneous pneumothorax is a common condition which is defined as air presence inside of pleural space. Despite, several studies that have been carried on management patients suffering spontaneous pneumothorax, the first step approach on patients is still the topic of debate. Since chest tube drainage and needle aspiration are widely used first step techniques in spontaneous pneumothorax, current study compares the efficacy of abovementioned techniques, as well as long-term outcomes. In current multi-center single-blinded RCT, all patients admitted with spontaneous pneumothorax will be enrolled study and written consent form provided by patients, simultaneously. Patients randomly assigned to study groups including (A) chest tube drainage and (B) needle aspiration. Subsequently, all patients will undergo one-year follow-up and will be evaluated in terms of treatment success rate and pneumothorax recurrence. Hypothesis of present trial are as follows: a) repetitive needle aspiration may lead to higher treatment success rate in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax, in comparison to chest tube drainage, b) needle aspiration may result in reduction of hospital admission duration in patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax compared to chest tube drainage, c) the rate of spontaneous pneumothorax recurrence during one-year follow up might be lower in patients who undergo needle aspiration instead of chest tube drainage.