Active clinical trials for "Poliomyelitis"

This is a follow-up of the primary series vaccination schedule in Study A3L24 (NCT01177722). The objectives are: To describe the antibody persistence to any antigen contained in the investigational DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T vaccine and Infanrix hexa™ prior to the booster dose To describe the safety and immunogenicity of the booster dose of either DTaP-IPV-Hep B-PRP-T or Infanrix hexa™ vaccine. To describe the immunogenicity of a booster dose of Prevenar™ given at 12 to 24 months.

The study will assess and compare the immune response to full-dose inactivated polio vaccines (IPV) via intramuscular (IM) administration and of the fractional dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (f-IPV) via intradermal (ID) administration, in different schedule combinations in the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) primary series.

A dose escalating study with 3 different dosing regimens of the studied vaccine (IPOVAC- POLYVAC-Vietnam) and a licensed vaccine (IMOVAC-Sanofi Pasteur- France) is conducted in Vietnamese children, aged 2 months and above to assess the safety and immunogenicity. Two hundred and forty children are enrolled and placed randomly into 4 groups (60 children/group), each of which receive 3 doses of vaccine subcutaneously, at 4 week interval. Safety issues included immediate reaction at the site of injection and systemic reaction within 30 min of administration, within 7 days after each dose, unexpected event occur within 30 days of each dose, SAE (from start of dose 1 to 30 days after dose 3), blood cell count, urea, ALT,AST. Immunogenicity outcomes include seroconversion of neutralising antibodies for each of vaccine serotypes.

The purpose of this study will be to evaluate whether a bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV) manufactured by Beijing Bio-Institute Biological Products Co., Ltd (BBIBP) has a similar immunogenicity profile to a WHO prequalified bOPV.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine based on Sabin strain (LBVC) in healthy infants to select optimal dose of LBVC as well as to demonstrate the lot-to-lot consistency and non-inferiority of LBVC.

This is a single-center, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, phase I study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of single injection of LBVD or Eupenta co-administered with Imovax Polio in healthy adults.

Primary Objective: To demonstrate that ProQuad® can be administered concomitantly with a booster dose of Infanrix® hexa to healthy children 12 to 23 months of age without impairing either the antibody response rates to measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, hepatitis B and Haemophilus influenzae type b; or to the 3 pertussis antibody titres measured at 42 days following vaccination. Secondary Objectives: To describe the antibody titres and the antibody response rates to measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b as measured at 42 days following vaccination by an Infanrix® hexa primary series schedule and all data are pooled. To evaluate the safety profile of ProQuad® when administered concomitantly with a booster dose of Infanrix® hexa by an Infanrix® hexa primary series schedule and all data are pooled.

An open clinical trial to study the immune response and safety after giving a booster dose (5th Dose) of a combination vaccine against Diphteria-Tetanus-Pertussis-Polio to healthy adolescents 15-16 Years of age. The first three doses were given during the first year of life, according to the Norwegian child immunization program. The fourth dose was given in a previous clinical trial performed in 1998 when the children were 6-7 years old. In 2006 there was a change in the child immunization program in Norway: a fourth dose of a Combination Vaccine Against Diphteria-Tetanus-Pertussis-Polio is given to children 6-7 years old. This study will give us information if there is need for an additional dose (5th dose) of a combination vaccine, containing the pertussis components, before the adolescents are leaving secondary school.

The purpose of this trial is to clinically confirm that the manufacturing process of the final bulk products of the investigational DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine is consistent. The primary objective is to demonstrate the equivalence of three batches of DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP~T vaccine, in terms of seroprotection and seroconversion rates for the vaccine antigens after the three-dose primary series. The secondary objectives are: To describe in each group, the immunogenicity parameters for all antigens one month after the third dose of the primary series To assess the overall safety in each group one month after the third dose of the primary series.

Post-marketing evaluation of reactions following receipt of recommended adolescent pertussis vaccine among persons with prior vaccination with acellular vs whole-cell pertussis vaccine. To describe and characterize adverse events occurring after vaccination with REPEVAX® (Tdap-IPV: combination diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis with inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine) or COVAXIS® (Tdap: combination diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis) vaccine among two groups: Group 1 - adolescents 10-14 years of age who participated in study 371-03/01 (and thus received a 5th dose of TRIPEDIA® vaccine) and Group 2 - controls 10-14 years of age who were vaccinated with at least three doses of a whole-cell pertussis vaccine in infancy plus at least one subsequent dose of pertussis vaccine in their 2nd through 7th year of life.