Active clinical trials for "Arthritis"

The first aim of this study is to test the efficacy of a real-time provider-based individuation intervention to improve the receipt of high-quality rheumatic disease care among Black/African American and lower socioeconomic status (SES) individuals. The second aim is to determine the effect of the individuation intervention on provider-patient communication, adherence, provider trust and care satisfaction.

Self-management is a key component of successful chronic disease management and patients can benefit from learning about how daily activities and treatments relate to their symptoms and health status on an ongoing basis. The primary goal of this randomized controlled trial is to assess the efficacy of an e-health intervention, OPERAS, which includes two components: 1) the use of a newly developed web app to self-monitor symptoms/disease activity and treatment use, and help patients identify when a medical visit or treatment change is needed; 2) remote activity counselling provided by a physiotherapist, with the use of a wearable device (Fitbit) and the app to provide activity level feedback. The app component of OPERAS is hosted by the secure network of Arthritis Research Canada.

The overall objective of this proposal is to implement a smart phone application (app) + population management system to monitor rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity between scheduled physician office visits. The population management system includes: 1) a web-based dashboard that consolidates incoming patient-reported data using pre-programmed algorithms to identify increases in disease activity, and 2) the population manager, a trained individual who monitors the web-based dashboard and connects patients with their healthcare providers (HCPs). The investigators central hypothesis is that the combined smart phone app + population management system will improve patient satisfaction and management of RA disease activity.

This is an international, single arm, multicenter, prospective, non-significant risk, Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study. Data will be collected for the commercially available AEQUALIS FLEX REVIVE shoulder system in both the anatomic and reversed configurations. The purpose of this study is to collect data needed to satisfy the European Union (EU) Medical Device Regulation (MDR) clinical post-market surveillance (PMS) and reporting requirements, and to support future regulatory submissions and peer-reviewed publications on device performance and safety.

This study seeks to describe, for children undergoing uveitis surveillance following a new diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the feasibility metrics of undertaking a randomised comparative study of routine slit lamp examination (SLE) versus imaging based (anterior segment optical coherence tomography, OCT) surveillance in order to inform the development of a larger multi-centre trial.

To assess the contributions of peripheral neurons to joint pain, the investigators plan to ask patients to rate the pain in their chosen joint before and after an injection of local anaesthetic (lidocaine) and steroid into their joint. Lidocaine blocks voltage gated sodium channels (VGSCs) leading to a reversible block of action potential propagation in peripheral nerves. If the pain intensity reduces significantly following lidocaine injection, it suggests that the patients' pain is due to peripheral sensitization, and that this is dampened by the local anaesthetic. If the pain intensity does not change or only falls slightly, then other centrally mediated factors are contributing to pain. Before the investigators can use this method, the investigators need to ensure that reductions in pain score following joint injection are not due to placebo effect. Therefore, as part of this validation study patients will be randomised to receive either lidocaine plus steroid or, as a control, just steroid injection. The steroid is the main part of therapy as it relieves inflammation over a prolonged period, but is slower acting than lidocaine, and should not have an effect within ten minutes. Any improvement in ranking of pain within 10 minutes by patients receiving just steroid will therefore be due to placebo effect. The investigators hypothesis is that there will be a significant difference in change in pain score before and after injection between the study group (lidocaine plus steroid) and control group (0.9% saline plus steroid). This will confirm the absence of a significant placebo effect and mean the differences in change in pain scores seen in the study group are due to differences in pain processing

The aim of the study is to adapt the Evaluation of Daily Activity Questionnaire into Turkish language, and to examine the reliability and validity for people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) is an emerging issue and a potentially life-threatening complication to patients with history of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection whose immune system is deficient or suppressed. It is estimated that the risk of HBVr ranges 20%-50% in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Not only HBsAg-positive patients but also HBsAg-negative/antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive patients (resolved hepatitis B) have the risk of HBVr. Recent studies also reported that the risk of HBVr associated with TNF-α inhibitor treatment widely ranged from 12.3% to 62.5%. Antiviral prophylaxis by nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) is recommended for patients with high risk of HBVr according to 2018 AASLD guidance. Phase 3 studies reported that tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy, TAF) can effectively suppress HBV in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients, and TAF is superior to TDF in safety profiles and ALT normalization. However, the evidence of TAF in prevention HBV reactivation for patients with HBsAg-positive and imflammatory arthritis, who need bDMARDs are still missing.

This prospective, non-interventional research registry is designed to study the comparative effectiveness and comparative safety of approved treatments for RA in a cohort of patients cared for by rheumatologists across North America. Secondary objectives include analyzing the epidemiology and natural history of the disease, its comorbidities, and current treatment practices.

This prospective, non-interventional, research registry is designed to study the comparative effectiveness and comparative safety of approved treatments for PsA-SpA in a cohort of patients cared for by rheumatologists across North America. Secondary objectives include analyzing the epidemiology and natural history of the disease, its comorbidities, and current treatment practices.