Active clinical trials for "Postoperative Complications"

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of perioperative inhalation of NO on reducing the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with recent COVID-19 infection, and to evaluate whether inhaled NO can improve the prognosis of patients. The investigators will enroll 660 surgical patients who was infected with SARS-CoV-2 within 42days (7 weeks ) prior to planed surgery under general anesthesia. Patients will be randomized to receive either inhaled nitric oxide (per protocol) or a placebo. Perioperative standards of care will be the institution's own protocols (such as ventilation strategies and use and dose of anesthetics, analgesia and fluid management, etc).

This is a randomized controlled trial designed to compare robot-assisted thoracic approach with open transthoracic esophagectomy (Ivor Lewis technique) as a surgical treatment for resectable esophageal cancer. If our hypothesis is proved correct, robot-assisted thoracic approach will result in a lower percentage of respiratory and overall postoperative complications, lower blood loss, shorter hospital stay, but with at least similar oncologic outcomes and better postoperative quality of life compared with the open transthoracic esophagectomy (current standard).

The surgical stress of an esophagectomy causes a detrimental impact on the physiological response of the body. In this perspective, one could question whether the current feeding regimens of starting early nutritional support at postoperative day (POD) 1 have a similar negative impact on the muscle mass as documented in critically ill patients. This study will introduce relative starvation in the early days following esophagectomy compared to the current regimen of early enteral nutritional support. The research team aims to investigate whether the negative impact on muscle mass and muscle function might be reduced, which should result in enhanced postoperative recovery. The final result of the study will be a well-documented and scientifically substantiated nutritional regimen for patients who underwent an esophagectomy for cancer.

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing two strategies of mean arterial blood pressure management (MAP ≥ 80mmHg vs MAP ≥ 65 mmHg) in high-risk surgical patients undergoing elective laparotomic/laparoscopic surgery.

Single-center, prospective, controlled, parallel, randomized, single-blind study comparing the conventional extubation technique to two positive pressure extubation techniques on postoperative desaturations

The study aims at investigate whether low oxygen therapy during anesthesia improves oxygen partial pressure and lung function in the postoperative period after abdominal surgery. 200 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery will be randomized (1:1) to goal directed low oxygen concentration during and after anesthesia vs. fixed high oxygen concentration. Arterial oxygen partial pressure is the primary outcome and lung function a secondary explanatory outcome.

A drop in blood pressure during anaesthesia for a surgical procedure has been associated with worse patient outcomes, including complications such as damage to the heart, brain and kidneys. Continuous blood pressure monitoring prior to the start of anaesthesia alerts the anaesthetist to drops in blood pressure and allows this to be treated promptly. This may help to avoid the complications described above. Continuous blood pressure monitoring is carried out by inserting a small plastic tube (cannula) into an artery. In this study, the investigators propose inserting a cannula into the radial artery in the wrist before a patient is anaesthetised for surgery. The usual technique for insertion of this cannula is for the anaesthetist to identify the site of the radial artery by feeling for an arterial pulse with the fingertips (palpation). An alternative technique for identification is to use ultrasound. Ultrasound creates a two-dimensional image of the area under the skin on a screen, enabling the operator to visualise the artery being targeted. This may reduce the number of cannulation attempts required, reducing patient discomfort.

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of the laparoscopic approach over the open approach in the resection of colorectal liver metastases, by examining the reduction of postoperative complications (including mortality), measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 90 days of the procedure or regardless of the date during the hospital stay.

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate. One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation. There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. These studies are generally planned for unilateral hernias. It is a controversial issue among surgeons that the possibility of mesh migration is higher in bilateral hernias since there is a larger dissection area. This discussion is the starting point of this study. There were no studies in the literature regarding mesh fixation in bilateral inguinal hernias. The aim of this study is to compare bilateral inguinal hernia patients with and without mesh fixation in the eTEP technique in terms of both mesh migration and clinical features.

Aim of the study is to compare prostate artery embolization (PAE) to the established surgical treatment for patient acceptance, morbidity, complications, and the functional outcomes. To compare length of stay, hospital costs and time for recovery. 140 patients will be randomized to PAE or surgery. Patients should suffer from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), be candidates for both treatments and willing to undergo both procedures. Before randomization computed tomography angiography of the pelvic arteries is done to select eligible patients. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate rules out possible cancer. The PAE is done in the angio suite in the radiology department injecting small particles into the prostate arteries. The surgery is done in the operation room in the urology department according to established procedures. Clinical follow-up include clinical visit after 3 months, 1 and 5 years. Acute as well as long term complications will be recorded.