Active clinical trials for "Incisional Hernia"

The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for the development of incisional hernias in emergency midline laparotomies.

Incisional hernias are a frequent consequence of abdominal surgery. Current clinical efforts are primarily focused on improving repair materials and surgical techniques to correct these hernias instead of the optimal solution: prevention. A product called MYOSEAL is currently being developed to prevent hernia formation after abdominal surgery by using fibrin tissue sealant and silver particles to prophylactically enhance the early wound healing of myofascial incisions. The purpose of this phase 1 study is to examine the safety of applying MYOSEAL immediately after abdominal wall suture closure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The investigators expect that applying this product to sutured myofascial incisions will increase collagen formation in the wound and thus prevent the formation of incisional hernias.

Nanotechnologies applied to General Surgery and Emergency Surgery: The Buckypaper as a new fixing method for prosthetic materials in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias in humans, in laparotomic procedures and as a new device for the treatment of solid cancer and hematopoietic system tumors. The experimentation on this new material, preliminary conducted on breed female rabbit New Zeeland, will be applicable to human, if the results in terms of toxicity and durability will be comfortable.

"Nanotechnologies applied to General Surgery and Emergency Surgery: The Buckypaper as a new fixing method for prosthetic materials in the treatment of abdominal wall hernias, diaphragmatic hernias, diaphragmatic rupture, incisional hernia and abdominal wall disaster in laparotomy procedure and laparoscopic procedures". Experimentation on breed pig Lantrace ANIMAL MODEL.

Postoperative seroma formation is one of the most common complications after ventral hernia repair with mesh. Although some seromas may not have clinical impact postoperative seroma formation often causes pain and discomfort and may even compromise wound healing. Abdominal binders (also called trusses, girdle, ostomy belt, longuette or abdominal belt) (AB) are commonly used in abdominal and plastic surgery to prevent seroma formation and diminish pain and discomfort after operation. The primary aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of postoperative abdominal binders after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair on postoperative pain, discomfort and quality of life. Secondary, we register seroma formation. A randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded study supplemented with blinded statistical analysis. We include 60 (2x30) incisional hernia repairs. Patients are randomized either to abdominal binder or no abdominal binder (controls). The abdominal binder is worn from immediately after the operation and continuously for 7 days and nights. All patients have a standardized operation with standardized intra- and postoperative medication regimen. Endpoints measurements are clinically detectable seroma formation scored with seroma classification system buý S. Morales-Conde, pain scored with self-registrations with VAS, and quality of life scored with EQ-5D, recurrence and other complications are also registered. Patients are followed until 90 days after the operation.

Despite of technological advances in surgery, incisional hernia and bowel obstruction remain frequent surgical complications. To date, the relationship between these two types of surgery and the occurrence of incisional hernia remains unclear. This is an observational study to evaluate outcomes of incisional hernia with respect to the incision site and adhesion-related bowel obstruction after open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Background: Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias has gained popularity, since many studies and a recent meta-analysis have reported encouraging results and recurrence rates similar to open repair. The choice of the mesh and fixation methods is of paramount importance during laparoscopic approach, and nowadays, lightweight macropore meshes specifically designed for laparoscopic approach represent the first choice in several studies, due to the biomechanical properties and the optimal integration into the abdominal wall. No data with statistical relevance exist on the choice of fixation methods. Primary end point of the present Italian multicentric prospective randomized trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different tacks to fix the lightweight polypropylene mesh (Physiomesh™) during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: metallic spiral tacks (Protack™) vs absorbable "U" shaped tacks (Securestrap™) Design of the Study: 200 patients with ventral hernia will be randomized into two groups: Group A patients will be submitted to laparoscopic repair by Physiomesh fixed by Protack; Group B patients will be submitted to laparoscopic repair by Physiomesh fixed by Securestrap. Blind randomization will be guaranteed by an on-line software with specific key access for every surgical unit participating in the study. Patients demographics and characteristics, preoperative studies, intraoperative and postoperative results and complications, as well as scheduled follow-up will be recorded and uploaded to the database. Data represented by continuous variables will be expressed as arithmetic mean +/- standard deviation. Other data will be expressed as geometric mean +/- 95% confidence interval. Data representing low incidence events will be expressed as number and percentage of occurrence for each group. Statistical significance for all analyses will be indicated by a p value of 0.05 or less.

The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of hernia recurrence with the use of biologic and prosthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair.

Incisional hernia is a common complication in visceral surgery and varies between 11 and 26% in the general surgical population. Patients requiring emergency laparotomy are at high risk for the development of incisional hernia and fascial dehiscence. Among this population the incidence of incisional hernia in patients undergoing emergency surgery varies between 33-54%. Incisional hernias are associated with a high morbidity rate, such as intestinal incarceration, chronic discomfort, pain, and reoperation and typically require implantation of a synthetic mesh in a later second operation. Fascial dehiscence represents an acute form of dehiscence and has been observed in up to 24.1% and is associated with a mortality rate up to 44%. The gold standard for abdominal wall closure during elective and emergency operations is a running slowly absorbable suture. In the elective situation it has been shown that prophylactic mesh implantation in high risk patients reduced the incidence of incisional hernia significantly. The investigators and others have shown that mesh implantation in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy or in contaminated abdominal cavities are safe . With a randomized controlled trial the investigators now aim to compare the incidence of incisional hernia after prophylactic mesh implantation versus standard of care in patients requiring emergency laparotomy.

This is a prospective multicenter study of patients diagnosed with a medium to giant incisional hernia (transverse defect >7 cm). Patients referred to the surgical outpatient clinic are invited to participate in the study. As a standard, all patients who are examined for incisional hernia undergo CT scan according to a hernia protocol, before planning of surgical repair (baseline scan). After this CT scan, patients are seen in the out-patient clinic once again and either treated conservatively without surgery, or scheduled for elective surgical repair of the hernia. If surgery is planned, the patients participating in the study undergo an additional CT scan in hernia protocol, within two weeks prior to surgery (follow-up scan). If a conservative non-surgical approach is chosen, patients can still participate in the study and will undergo an additional CT scan after 28-32 weeks.