Active clinical trials for "Pain, Postoperative"

Safety of an eight-day treatment with ibuprofen after primary hip and knee arthroplasties.

A double-blind randomized control study to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus ketamine as an adjuvant in combination with bupivacaine ultrasound-guided ESP block in patients scheduled for cardiothoracic surgeries with thoracotomy incision.

Knee osteoarthritis is a major issue worldwide with limited treatment options. Many patients receive knee joint replacement surgery which is considered effective and safe. Nonetheless the period post-surgery is characterized by moderate to severe pain inhibiting early ambulation, motivation and range of motion, compromising rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall outcomes. An optimal strategy of postoperative pain treatment after knee replacement surgery has not yet been established. Recently, our research center and others have shown that is possible to target the nerves surrounding the knee with a novel treatment called cryoneurolysis. Cryoneurolysis apply low temperatures [-20°C ; -100°C] to a target nerve, which disrupts nerve function and provides potential pain relief. This suggest a potential for cryoneurolysis to significantly improve rehabilitation, reduce opioid intake and overall outcomes after knee replacement surgery. The primary objective of the current project is to determine the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its proposed ability to reduce opioid intake and postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery. The study is a randomized controlled study with two groups. Group CRYO receives cryoneurolysis prior to knee replacement surgery and group SHAM receives a sham treatment prior to knee replacement surgery. Both groups receive surgery, analgesics and postoperative rehabilitation as per usual. Efficacy of treatment is evaluated using the change in opioid intake in the CRYO group compared to the SHAM group 14 days after knee replacement surgery. Participants will also be assessed at 90 and 180 days after knee replacement surgery and will include measures on pain, quality of life and function.

This is a randomized, prospective, double-blind, clinical trial to assess the effect of 3% and 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) as irrigant on postendodontic pain and rescue medication intake following single visit root canal treatment

The study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, and safety of HR18034 for postoperative analgesia in subjects undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.

Procedure specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) guidelines for abdominal hysterectomy published in 2006 recommended laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy as a preferred surgical technique. Multimodal postoperative pain management plane includes cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors, and/or conventional non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) in combination with strong opioids for high-intensity pain or with weak opioids for moderate- or low-intensity pain. Paracetamol also was recommended in combination with COX-2 inhibitors or conventional NSAIDs. Epidural analgesia was recommended for high-risk patients. PROSPECT guidelines updated in 2018 discuss only perioperative approach for laparoscopic hysterectomy. However, hysterectomy technique has been switched from total abdominal to laparoscopic approach. In low resources settings, laparoscopic technique is nor well developed neither available to many patients. Furthermore, the majority of patients undergo total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), that is very painful procedure. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a regional analgesic technique described by Blanco in 2007. Society for Obstetric Anesthesiology and Perinatology (SOAP) and European Society for Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA) recommended QLB for post-Cesarean pain management in cases where intrathecal morphine could not be used or for breakthrough pain. Previous reports have shown that QLB is effective in providing pain relief after various abdominal operations. The effects of QLB for laparoscopic hysterectomy is controversial. We would like to see if QLB can provide analgesic benefits in multimodal pain management after TAH in our clinical settings.

Adequate pain management after minimally invasive cardiac surgery is essential for early ambulation and patient satisfaction. However, an incision similar to thoracotomy surgery is made by entering between the ribs, and a severely painful postoperative period is experienced as the intercostal nerves are cut. Invasive cardiac surgery is necessary surgery that can take steps to improve the quality of life and functional status of patients without sternotomy. However, patients may experience intense pain in the immediate postoperative period, which can lead to inactivity, increased risk of complications, and greater consumption of opioids, resulting in adverse effects and prolonged hospital stays. Pain management is challenging due to a large number of dermatomes covered. Interpectoral plane block + serratus anterior plane block, defined in 2012, has been used in many studies before as part of multimodal analgesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Erector spinae block was also described in 2018 with positive results, which has been used in both sternotomies (open heart surgery) and minimally invasive procedures. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery can be excruciating in the postoperative period, just like thoracotomy surgeries. What is aimed in this study is to compare two previously known regional anesthesia techniques in this study.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and Retrolaminar Block on postoperative recovary quality and pain after lumbar spinal surgery

The goal is to find out if Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) given as an injection decreases pain score if given into the vaginal cuff right before starting the minimally invasive (robotic-assisted or laparoscopic) total hysterectomy in patients scheduled for benign indication? Participants will write down pain score at various intervals pain medication used Treatment patients will receive 1)intervention arm will receive Exparel mixed with bupivicaine 2)control arm will receive bupivicaine only

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a widely applied therapy to treat chronic neuropathic pain, and one of the most common indications is persisting radicular neuropathic pain following lumbar spine surgery. In traditional SCS therapies, the objective has been to replace the pain sensation with paresthesia. The anticipation is that the electrical current alters pain processing by masking the sensation of pain with a comfortable tingling or paresthesia. Although patients mostly cope with paresthesia, a significant proportion reports that the sensation is unpleasant. 'Burst' SCS utilizes complex programming to deliver high-frequency stimuli. This SCS technique seems to provide paresthesia-free stimulation, resulting in better pain relief of low back and leg pain then traditional tonic stimulation. The widespread use of SCS has not been backed by solid evidence. The absence of placebo-controlled trials has long been an important point of criticism, but due to the nature of the intervention with sensation of paresthesia, studies with placebo control have so far not been considered possible. When 'burst' SCS is used the stimulation is often unnoticed by the patient, allowing comparison with placebo stimulation. The aim of this randomized double-blind sham-controlled crossover trial is to evaluate the efficacy of 'burst' spinal cord stimulation for chronic radicular pain following spine surgery.