Active clinical trials for "Presbyopia"

Non-invasive double-blind randomised comparative study on presbyopic subjects wearing progressive lenses.

This clinical trial will document the feasibility of the Apioc lens design by assessing which lens shape parameters yield successful on-eye-fit and movement of the Apioc contact lens design and evaluate the subjectively-reported comfort of the Apioc contact lens design.

Current visual outcomes expectations of cataract patients are similar to those of refractive surgery patients. Their desire is to be spectacle independent for far, intermediate and near vision activities. Different options are available including: mono-vision and presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses (IOL). Presbyopia correcting IOLs include accommodative, multifocal, trifocal and extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. The Vivity Extended Vision IOL is not a multifocal IOL but due to its design, it provides better intermediate and near VA compared to a monofocal IOL.

Primary objective of this study is to compare two presbyopia correction surgical techniques, specificaly premium monovision, in which the dominant eye is corrected with an extended depth of field intraocular lens and the non-dominant eye with a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens, and the bilateral implantation of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses.

Primary objective of this study is to identify the optimal task lighting conditions (in terms of light intensity and light temperature) for 10 activities of daily living (ADLs) that require near or intermediate vision acuity in a validated ADL simulation framework for a sample of patients who underwent presbyopic correction with bilateral multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implantation, and to compare their capacity to perform ADLs (ADL scores) between three study groups (SG): SG1. patients implanted bilaterally with trifocal diffractive IOLs, SG2. patients implanted bilaterally with bifocal hybrid (diffractive-refractive) IOLs, SG3. patients implanted bilaterally with monofocal IOLs

This study is a 3-month, prospective, up to 2 center, bilateral, randomized subject masked clinical evaluation of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) when both eyes are targeted for emmetropia and when the non-dominant eye is targeted for mini monovision (-0.75 D) in patients with or without astigmatism undergoing routine cataract surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare lens comfort on Day 30 for Air Optix® lenses cared for with OPTI-FREE® PureMoist® (OFPM) Multi Purpose Disinfecting Solution (MPDS) compared to Acuvue® Oasys® lenses cared for with habitual MPDS.

The aim of this study is to assess the visual performance of prototype soft contact lens designs compared to a commercially available contact lens

Primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of premium monovision with Restor and Panoptix, against other prevalent monovision techniques and against bilateral Panoptix implantation in a sample of patients following lens-extraction surgery.

Evaluation of preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) obtained with VirtIOL device compared to postoperative CDVA.