Active clinical trials for "Pressure Ulcer"

A prototype support surface has been designed which aims to successfully redistributes the pressures exerted and provides sufficient support to human soft tissue We want to prove the effectiveness of the prototype support surface by enlisting patients in a clinical trial, where we will assess the presence of pressure ulcers, and the ability of the patients to tolerate the support surface, and also measure the pressure over time and compare them to when the patients are using standard mattresses.

Pressure ulcers are a serious and common problem for residents admitted to long-term care facilities and community care patients. They represent a major burden to patients, carers and the healthcare system, affecting approximately 1 in 20 community patients. They occur frequently among patients with limited mobility, such as those patients being bed-bound and/or wheelchair-bound. In many countries, pressure ulcers are recognized as a national health issue and governments designate pressure ulcers as one of the most important sentinel events for healthcare. International guidelines recommend the use of pressure redistributing support surfaces, systematic patient repositioning and preventive skin care to prevent pressure ulcers. All interventions should be patient-tailored and based on a thorough assessment of both the patient and contextual risk factors. As pressure ulcers can arise in a number of ways, interventions for prevention and treatment need to be applied across a wide range of settings, including the community, nursing homes and hospitals. A review of mortality and severe harm incidents reported to the National Reporting and Learning System found that pressure ulcers were the largest proportion of patient safety incidents in 2011/2012, accounting for 19% of all reports. It has been acknowledged that a significant proportion of pressure ulcers are avoidable. The prevalence of pressure ulcers is 1 of the 4 common harms recorded in the UK NHS Safety Thermometer, a local improvement tool for measuring, monitoring and analysing patient harms across a range of settings, including nursing homes, community nursing and hospitals on a monthly basis. Continuous low levels or short-term high levels of pressure and shear on the skin and underlying tissue on vulnerable areas are extrinsic factors contributing to the development of pressure ulcers. Support surfaces (e.g. any mattresses, integrated bed systems, mattress replacement, overlay, seat cushion, or seat cushion overlay) are specialized devices for pressure redistribution specifically designed for management of tissue loads, micro- climate, and/or therapeutic functions. A Cochrane systematic review by McInnes et al. (2015) defined multiple groups of pressure redistribution materials: low-tech (not electrically driven) constant low-pressure supports, high-tech supported surfaces, and other supported surfaces (operating table mattress pad, rotating beds, cushions, and limb protectors). Static or reactive overlay mattresses are an example of a low-tech constant low pressure support. Static air mattresses maintain a continuous low air pressure that exerts a pressure redistributing effect. Serraes and Beeckman (2016) found a pressure ulcer incidence of 5.1% in patients placed on static air support surfaces (mattress overlay, heel wedge, and seat cushion) in a high risk population in a nursing home setting in Belgium. A multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial in 26 nursing homes (including 308 residents) between April 2017 and May 2018 resulted in a significantly lower pressure ulcer incidence when applying the principle of static air (n=8/154, 5.2%) compared to the alternating air group (n=18/154, 11.7%)(p=0.04). The median time to develop a pressure ulcer category II-IV was significantly longer in the static air group (10.5 days, IQR 1-14) compared to the alternating air group (5.4 days, IQR 1-12; p=0.05). The study concluded that a static air mattress was significantly more effective compared to an alternating air pressure mattress to prevent pressure ulcers in a high risk nursing home population. This multicentre cohort study will be performed in 5 nursing homes in a random sample of 40 residents who are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. Residents will be included in the study for a period of 14 days. Skin assessment and risk factor registration will be done on a daily basis by the nurses. Reliability checks and time measurements will be completed by the researcher.

The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial of a lifestyle redesign intervention's ability to (1)reduce the incidence of medically serious pressure ulcers and associated surgeries in adults with spinal cord injury, and (2)assess the intervention's cost-effectiveness and potential cost savings and its effects on participants' quality of life.

In this study we would like to find a way to prevent sacral pressure ulcers in high-risk patients by the use of a Mepilex sacral dressing. The research question we would like to answer is the following: Is the Mepilex sacral dressing a cost-effective dressing for the prevention of grade I to grade IV pressure ulcers in the sacral region in higher-risk hospitalized patients?

The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate if DermaTherapy® bedding will significantly reduce pressure ulcer incidence by decreasing maceration, friction, and shearing among residents of Nursing Homes.

Maintaining and improving skin health are major goals in acute and long-term care. Patients at the extremes of age, the critically ill, medically compromised and those with immobility are at risk for developing several skin disorders, with pressure ulcers (PUs) as one of the most common and mostly preventable ones. Prevalence figures of PUs vary between 6.4% and 31.4%. PUs are described as localised injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or pressure combined with shear. Prevention of PUs is internationally seen to be a key quality indicator of care. To prevent PUs, reducing both the amount and the duration of pressure and shear at the pressure points of the body is strongly recommended. One of the interventions to achieving this, is the use of pressure-reducing devices (mattresses, cushions, etc.). Studies that compare the (cost-) effectiveness of different pressure-reducing devices are needed. The primary aim of this study is to compare the (cost-) effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention in high risk patients using static air support devices (Repose®) versus alternating-pressure devices. The second aim is to get insight in patients' experiences and perceptions of comfort using static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices. The third aim is to get insight in caretakers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators of the use of static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices and to reveal how these perceptions influence the readiness to use the products in clinical practice. This randomized controlled trial will be performed in ca. 25 nursing homes in a random sample of 306 residents who are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. Residents will be included in the study for a period of 14 days. Skin assessment and risk factor registration will be done on a daily basis by the nurses. Reliability checks and time measurements will be completed by the researcher.

This study will use a traditional parallel randomization design with patients in five medical intensive care units at the Cleveland Clinic to evaluate the efficacy of silk-like bed sheets and underpads for prevention of Unit-Acquired Pressure Ulcers (UAPU). Adult hospitalized patients in beds with standard bed linens versus those with silk-like linens will be compared for 1) rate of development of UAPU, 2) time to develop the first UAPU, and the maximum severity of any UAPU that develop. Bed linens will be changed per unit protocol. Patient characteristics will be summarized using frequencies and percentages for categorical factors and means, standard deviations, percentiles and median and range for continuous measures. For the primary outcome of unit-acquired pressure ulcer rate, generalized linear mixed models, assuming a Poisson distribution for the outcome, and unit length of stay as an offset will be used. For the time to event analysis, frailty models will be used to assess whether time to first pressure ulcer differs between treatment types. Generalized linear mixed models will be used for other secondary endpoints, including maximum severity of observed pressure ulcers

A prospective, randomized, active-controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate safety of sericin-chitosan cream in healthy volunteers.

This study aims to determine effect of body temperature changes during total knee arthroplasty surgery on early postoperative pressure sore formation.

This is a Clinical study Phase III, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter, National, Non-inferiority. Its purpose is to determine the noninferiority in efficacy of an investigational product in relation to the product available in the market intended of treating pressure ulcers.