Active clinical trials for "Prolapse"

In practice, the Investigators recommend that patients bring a family member or close friend to their pre-operative appointment to help with patient anxiety, comprehension, and informed decision-making. However, there is limited literature to support this recommendation. The investigators are exploring if having a support person present during this consent process impacts anxiety, satisfaction, knowledge, and preparedness for surgery.

This cross sectional, two cohort study seeks to investigate both anatomic outcome and subjective, functional outcome of uterosacral ligament suspension versus robotic sacrocolpopexy and compare patient satisfaction, bladder function, sexual function and complication rate for each procedure.This study will provide a better understanding about the durability of these procedures and long term complication.

retrospective and prospective data collection for a database. Patients will have had or are going to have a repair of their pelvic organ prolapse using the Gynecare mesh Prolift System

The main objective of this study is to perform the linguistic validation of the french version of the PISQ-R questionnaire in a population of sexually active (or not) patients who have undergone surgery (or not) for stress urinary incontinence or genital prolapse.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes in patients having vaginal prolapse repair with the Elevate prolapse repair kit and compare these outcomes to patients who had a repair with Prolift. .

Robotic approach to sacral colpopexy is a relatively new procedure. The literature is scarce in regard to its long-term outcomes. This advanced procedure is offered at MMH through the Urogynecology division. The Investigators setup to review the one year outcome of patients who underwent this procedure using a polypropylene mesh. These outcomes will include anatomical and quality of life measures.

Chart review conducted on all patients having had Prolift surgery since 2005 by Dr. Lary Sirls, Dr. Predeep Nagaraju and Dr. Kenneth Peters at William Beaumont Hospital.

The purpose of the study is to compare the risk of being unable to urinate shortly after surgery, also called acute post-operative urinary retention (POUR) between spinal and general anesthesia in women who undergo outpatient pelvic organ prolapse with stress urinary incontinence surgery.

The Investigators hypothesize that functional status scores in elderly women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse will be lower at 6 weeks post-operatively but will have returned to baseline at 12 weeks post-operatively. The Investigators hypothesize that greater co-morbidity, frailty and worse functional status before surgery are associated with slower functional recovery, prolonged length of stay in a hospital or nursing care institution and greater post-operative complications following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Compare changes in bowel function before, 6 months and one year after Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Compare objective anatomic outcomes before, 6 months and one year after Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.