Standard Moderately Hypofractionated RT vs. Ultra-hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost...
Prostate CancerEBRT is one of the standard treatment options for patients with localized PCA. Based on the outcome of randomized trials, moderately hypofractionated RT(19-25 fractions of 2.5-3.4Gy) is considered equivalent to conventional fractionated schemes with 35-39 fractions of 2Gy. A schedule of 20 fractions to a dose of 60-62Gy is adopted as standard of care for all risk-groups. Driven by the success of moderate hypofractionation, there is a strong trend towards extreme hypofractionation, also called SBRT, reducing the number of fractions even further. The schedule mostly used is 5 fractions of 7-7.25Gy. Its effectiveness, equivalence to standard EBRT schedules, has been demonstrated for low and favourable intermediate risk (IM) patients. For unfavourable IM (here defined as IM with ISUP grade 3) and high-risk (HR) PCA the outcome of EBRT can be further improved by dose escalation. Because of dose-limiting toxicity, the maximal dose of EBRT for conventionally fractionated schemes was approximately 80Gy. Initially hypofractionation was considered as a potential way to escalate the biologically effective dose (BED) above 80Gy, however, this proved not to be the case. With hypofractionation, a saturation in dose effect seems to be present at a BED of 80Gy. Recently, the multi-centre phase III FLAME trial broke the '80Gy barrier' and showed that in mainly HR PCA patients, treated with a conventional fractionation schedule, focal boosting of the intraprostatic lesion to a total dose of 95Gy improves biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS). However, given the advantages of hypofractionation in terms of patient comfort and costs, the FLAME schedule is not ideal as the standard treatment. For unfavourable IM and HR PCA patients the value of SBRT has not yet been established. The FLAME trial showed that higher than standard BED is a prerequisite for optimal bDFS. Furthermore, post SBRT biopsies results suggest a dose response relationship with better outcome of dose levels above 40Gy. Therefore, probably a higher than standard dose SBRT is necessary for these patients. A recent meta-analysis suggests diminishing results from increased fraction sizes in SBRT. So, the question remains whether dose escalation in SBRT will indeed improve treatment outcome. With standard SBRT to the whole prostate, dose escalation is limited to 40Gy because of unacceptable toxicity. In line with FLAME, we conducted the Hypo-FLAME trial investigating focal dose escalation in SBRT. In the phase II Hypo-FLAME trial, 100 patients with IM or HR PCA were treated with SBRT 35Gy in 5 weekly fractions to the whole prostate with a focal boost up to 50Gy. The acute toxicity rates, the primary endpoint, were low and similar to standard SBRT indicating this schedule can be safely applied. Given this was a phase II trial, no conclusions on oncological outcome can be drawn. Shortening of the overall treatment time (OTT) has been suggested to play a role in SBRT efficacy and 5 fractions delivered every other day this is internationally accepted as standard. We therefore initiated the phase II Hypo-FLAME 2.0 trial, investigating the feasibility of a reduction in the OTT of the Hypo-FLAME schedule from 29 to 15 days with acute toxicity as primary endpoint. The accrual of this trial is completed and a first analysis of the primary endpoint shows low toxicity figures, well in the range of what was expected. We expect to submit the analysis for publication by the end of 2022. At present, it is unknown what the oncological efficacy of the Hypo-FLAME schedule is compared to the standard of care in unfavourable IM and HR prostate cancer. Therefore, we will conduct a Phase III multi-centre randomized trial, in which 484 patients with unfavourable IM or HR PCA will be randomized between: Standard treatment; moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy 62 Gy in 20 fractions of 3.1Gy Experimental treatment; SBRT 5x7Gy with an iso-toxic integrated focal boost up to 50 Gy (Hypo-FLAME).
Water Vapor Ablation for Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Prostate CancerThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Vanquish Water Vapor Ablation Device ("Vanquish") in treating subjects with Gleason Grade Group 2 (GGG2) localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Testing the Safety and Effectiveness of Radiation-based Treatment (Lutetium Lu 177 Dotatate) for...
Prostate Adenocarcinoma With Neuroendocrine DifferentiationProstate Neuroendocrine Carcinoma2 moreThis phase II trial studies how well lutetium Lu 177 dotatate works in treating patients with prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation that has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Neuroendocrine differentiation refers to cells that have traits of both hormone-producing endocrine cells and nerve cells. These cells release hormones into the blood in response to a signal from the nervous system. Hormones are biological substances that circulate through the bloodstream to control the activity of other organs or cells in the body. Lutetium Lu 177-dotate is a radioactive drug. It binds to a protein called somatostatin receptor, which is found on some neuroendocrine tumor cells. Lutetium Lu 177-dotatate builds up in these cells and gives off radiation that may kill them. It is a type of radioconjugate and a type of somatostatin analog. Treatment with Lutetium Lu 177 dotatate may shrink the tumor in a way that can be measured in patients with metastatic prostate cancer with neuroendocrine differentiation.
High-dose Brachytherapy Boost With Stereostatic Body Radiation Therapy to Intermediate or Higher...
Prostatic CancerThe objective of this phase I/II trial is to prospectively evaluate the toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of Stereostatic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) to prostate and pelvic lymph nodes in combination with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy to the prostate in patients with localized unfavorable-intermediate risk or higher disease.
A Study of AC176 for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer
Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate CancerThis clinical trial is evaluating a drug called AC176 in Chinese participants with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed on at least one prior systemic therapy. The main goals of this study are to: Evaluate the safety and tolerability of AC176, evaluate pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity of AC176
Study of 177Lu-PSMA-0057 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Metastatic Prostate CancerThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 177Lu-PSMA-0057 in metastatic prostate cancer.
Study of 225Ac-PSMA-617 in Men With PSMA-positive Prostate Cancer
Prostatic NeoplasmsCastration-ResistantThis is a Phase 1, open-label, international, dose escalation study to evaluate the safety of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 (225Ac-PSMA-617) in men with PSMA-positive prostate cancer who have and have not had prior exposure to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) or [177Lu]Lu-PSMA I&T (177Lu-PSMA I&T).
Pacritinib for Biochemical Relapse After Definitive Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Prostate CancerThis is a single-arm, open-label study using pacritinib for patients with histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma, status post definitive treatment and biochemical recurrence.
Detecting Metastases by PyL PET/CT in Subjects Starting Enzalutamide for Untreated Castration Resistant...
Prostate CancerThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL (PyL) PET/CT in subjects presenting not previously treated for castration resistant prostate cancer and showing negative or equivocal findings per institutional standard of care conventional imaging
PSMA-PET Guided Hypofractionated Salvage Prostate Bed Radiotherapy
Prostate CancerCancer RecurrenceAfter radical prostatectomy approximately 15-40% of men develop a biochemical recurrence (BR) within 5 years. The standard treatment of post-prostatectomy BR is salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT). sEBRT can provide long-term disease control; with 5 year biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) up to 60% and with most treatment failures in the first 2 years after sEBRT. The main goal of this project is to investigate whether the oncologic outcome in patients with post-prostatectomy recurrent PCa can be improved, by increasing the biological effective radiation dose using a hypofractionated schedule of 20 x 3 = 60 Gy. The study is designed as a prospective open phase III randomized multicenter trial. All patients with biochemical recurrence with a PSA < 1.0 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer without evidence of lymph nodes or distance metastases will be included. PSA progression after prostatectomy defined as two consecutive rises with the final PSA > 0.1 ng/mL or three consecutive rises will be included. All eligible patients will be randomized to one of the following two treatment arms: Arm 1 = Conventional sEBRT to apply a total dose of 70 Gy in 35 daily fractions of 2 Gy during 7 weeks. Arm 2 = Hypofractionated sEBRT to apply a total dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions of 3 Gy during 4 weeks. The primary endpoint will be the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) after treatment.