Active clinical trials for "Prostatic Neoplasms"

The proposed phase 1 clinical trial will investigate the safety and tolerability of 177Lu-CYT-500 in patients with metastatic prostate cancer and determine the optimal antibody mass and dose of 177Lu to be used for further study.

This is a multicenter, randomized, phase II study of the safety and efficacy of two dose levels of oral ATN-224 in patients with prostate cancer with a rising serum PSA in the absence of detectable disease. Patients will be randomized (1:1) after confirmation of eligibility requirements. The primary endpoint is to determine the proportion of patients who do not have PSA progression for 24 weeks. PSA progression is defined as at least a 50% increase in PSA and >5 ng/mL from baseline or post-treatment nadir if lower than baseline, confirmed by another PSA at least 28 days later.

Surgery and irradiation for organ confined prostate cancer provide excellent long-term cancer control but they may be accompanied by a risk of side effects that decrease quality of life. Due to the stage migration of prostate cancer, the potential for patients to undergo unnecessary treatment and the risk of treatment related morbidity, has been increased.Alternative strategies that offer the possibility of delaying, obviating or minimizing the impact of treatment maintaining the same oncological long term results have been investigated. Despite pros and cons active surveillance has not gained popularity in men with low risk prostate cancer as only 7% of men with localized prostate cancer remain in active surveillance. Traditionally solid tumors have been treated with radical surgery but selective, organ sparing therapies are now common for tumors of the breast, skin and kidney, resulting in equivalent rates of cancer control, lower morbidity rates and less disfigurement. With this in mind the potential role of focal ablative therapy for localized prostate cancer might be considered. The researchers will investigate the feasibility and the efficacy in term of quality of life and oncologic results of focal therapy by a pilot not randomized prospective study in a patients with localized prostate cancer who meet low risk criteria based on clinical, biopsy and imaging data.

RATIONALE: Studying samples of blood and urine from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors identify and learn more about biomarkers related to cancer. It may also help doctors predict how patients will respond to treatment. PURPOSE: This laboratory study is measuring plasma and urine biomarkers in patients with advanced prostate cancer that did not respond to hormone therapy.

The investigators try to investigate the benefit of early administration (immediately after urethral catheter removal) of sildenafil after nerve-sparing RALP for 3 months. The investigators will compare the potency rates up to 2 years after nerve-sparing RALP in men with on- demand sildenafil 100mg dosing from the early postoperative period (immediately after urethral catheter removal) with from the delayed postoperative period (3 months after RP).

The purpose of this study is to monitor the safety of continued DN-101 and docetaxel treatment for subjects previously enrolled in DN101-002 (ASCENT) or DN101-004 (NSCLC) Studies.

RATIONALE: Learning about the long-term effects of chemoprevention drugs, such as finasteride, in patients with prostate cancer may help doctors plan better treatment and follow-up care. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is following patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer while undergoing treatment with either finasteride or a placebo on the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT).

In this study we are comparing two forms of radiotherapy. This study is being done because it is not clear at present time whether intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can reduce side effects of radiotherapy compared to standard radiotherapy (called 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy).

The purpose of this trial is to compare two similar treatments for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. The two treatment arms being compared are: (Standard Arm) hormone therapy, which will prevent the production of the male hormone, testosterone, by the testicles, and pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) followed by a high-dose, conformal EBRT boost versus (Investigational Arm) hormone therapy and pelvic EBRT followed by a brachytherapy boost (implantation of radioactive iodine sources or "seeds" into the prostate). The hypothesis of this trial is that more patients may experience 5 year actuarial freedom from biochemical recurrence of their prostate cancer following treatment with the investigational arm. Biochemical failure is declared on the date when the post treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) is > 2 ng/mL above the lowest level previously recorded.

Androgen (a male sex hormone) deprivation is the standard therapy for metastatic prostate cancer and results in regression or control of disease in 80-85% of patients. This hormone therapy results in a progression-free survival of 12-18 months and overall survival of 24-30 months. However, all patients ultimately develop hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Management of HRPC patients is a significant challenge for both patient and physician. Neither past nor current chemotherapy regimens have shown curative potential in patients with HRPC. Thus new treatment strategies are a high priority. A major focus of new treatment strategies is to enlist the aid of the immune system, particularly the development of prostate cancer vaccines. There has been a number of studies using dendritic cell based vaccines and the treatment has been well tolerated. Specific T-cell immune responses have been observed and occasional evidence for tumor regression. A reduction in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been observed as well. Lengthening the time-to-progression and delays in the onset of bone pain have been observed in subsets of patients with HRPC. The initial preclinical observations suggesting that a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) gene transduced allogeneic (GVAX) prostate cancer vaccine may be efficacious in poorly immunogenic cancers were reported. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and immunologic effects of vaccinations with Allogeneic Prostate GVAX® (CG1940 & CG8711) in patients made lymphopenic by treatment with chemotherapy and infused with autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Clinical observations and laboratory measurements will be monitored to evaluate safety, toxicity and immune responses. Additionally, the effects of treatment on serum PSA levels and tumor response will be evaluated.