Active clinical trials for "Prostatic Hyperplasia"

The investigators hypothesize that Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate (PkEP) might yield functional results comparable to OP but with lower perioperative morbidity, and have equivalent long-term efficacy with OP for large prostates. The first objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of PKEP compared to OP concerning Qmax at one year postoperatively. To explore the long-term efficacy, we compared the efficacy, safety, and morbidity of PkEP with those of OP in BPH patients with prostate glands larger than 100 g over a follow-up period of 6 years.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a single treatment of PRX302 for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) as compared to placebo.

Investigator-initiated study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostate artery embolization for the treatment lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

This is a investigator-initiated evaluation of the safety and efficacy of treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by prostatic artery embolization.

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of a single injection of 50 U and 100 U doses of BoNT-A for the treatment of BPH-associated LUTS.

A prospective multicenter randomized blinded study comparing Aquablation of the prostate with the AQUABEAM System and TURP for the treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). The primary endpoints for safety and effectiveness were measured at 3 and 6 months, respectively, and subjects were followed out to 5 years to collect long-term clinical data.

To investigate the pharmacokinetic properties and safety after administration of HCP1303 and co-administration of HGP1201, HIP1402 in healthy male volunteers

The primary objective of this trial is to compare the 9-month effect on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of Prostatic Artery Embolization (PAE) using Embosphere® versus Standard Combined Therapy (alpha-blockers plus 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors) in patients with symptomatic BPH who failed after a first line medical treatment with alpha-blockers. The secondary objectives of this study are to: Estimate the impact of the 2 strategies on benign prostatic hyperplasia specific Health Status (i.e. urinary and sexual signs and symptoms) at 3, 9, 18, and 24 months, as well as the side effects of the 2 strategies; Report the safety of PAE; Evaluate patient's adherence to medical treatment; Analyse the costs of each strategy and report the incremental efficiency (incremental cost utility ratio) of prostatic artery embolization compared to medical treatment.

Single-arm prospective, interventional clinical trial. Results will be compared to a historical control in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

It was aimed to evaluate and investigate the effects of tamsulosin hydrochloride, has preferential selectivity for the α1A receptor in the prostat versus the α1B receptor in the blood vessels, and alfuzosin hydrochloride on choroidal thickness (CT), pupil diameter sizes evaluated by using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) and scheimpflug/placido photography-based topoghraphy system in this study. 63 men patients with newly diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomly assigned to either alfuzosin hydrochloride or to tamsulosin hydrochloride groups in this prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, pupillography were obtained at baseline, 1st and 3rd month, and choroidal thicknesses and pupil diameter sizes were compared between the 2 groups.