Active clinical trials for "Prosthesis Failure"

Clinical evaluation of 4 different bearings in THA. Primary parameter being prosthetic survival data.

The tracheoesophageal voice with voice prosthesis is currently the mainstay of voice rehabilitation post laryngectomy. The primary surgical technique of tracheoesophageal fistula formation with insertion of prosthesis and quick and easy process of voice rehabilitation are main encouraging factors. However, the usage of the prosthesis relates to a significant number of complications rated from 10 to 60%. The most common reported complication is transprosthetic leakage that determines the need of device exchange. However in some patients occur more serious complications eg. periprosthetic leakage, granulation or atrophy of mucosa around the fistula, dislocation of prosthesis, that may require anti-inflammatory treatment, temporary nasogastric tube feeding or surgical procedure. The standard protocol is voice prosthesis exchange due to transprosthetic leakage. Optionally the device could be replaced regularly to prevent both transprosthetic leakage and other complication occurrence. In the study we plan to compare the benefits from regular (each three month) versus leakage-related exchange of voice prosthesis post laryngectomy including the rate of complications, fistula colonization by Candida species and patients feedback.

The purpose of this study is to compare three different core build-up materials for dental use. The study hypothesis is that there is no differences in survival rate of the different core build-ups.

A retrospective consecutive population of patients treated with conical tapered stems in cementless total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis due to congenital hip pathologies will be selected. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic results of this implant and the survival rates in such a specific cohort.

Tooth loss is a major dental problem worldwide. A recent study in Singapore found that approximately one third of adults aged over 65 are living without any natural teeth. Prevalence of loss of some teeth, or partial edentulism, in this population is estimated to be even higher. Tooth loss has a series of deleterious consequences for oral and general health. The high prevalence of tooth loss has resulted in great needs and demands of prosthetic replacements, posing challenges to the public dental care system in Singapore. Removable dentures are the most widely and commonly used device to replace missing teeth and restore oral functions. The removable denture possesses a metal framework that connects other components of the denture, to ensure rigidity and stability while in function. However, the current method of fabricating denture frameworks is a complex, error-prone, time-consuming, and expensive process. Due to the inherent inaccuracies in the materials and technique, fit of the framework is compromised and undesirable to meet patients' satisfaction. With the new development of computer aided design and 3D printing metal techniques, it is now possible to apply digital design and manufacturing for the fabrication of dentures. This proposal aims to compare the precision and fit, and patient satisfaction, of 3D printed and conventional casted removable denture frameworks in preclinical and clinical settings.

Several surgical options for the reconstruction of massive bone defects have been described and include biologic methods with autografts and allografts, and the use of tumor endoprostheses (total femoral replacement, TFR). Several types of modular TFR are available, but nevertheless unpredictable outcomes and high complication rates have been described from most authors. The aim of the present study was to compare complication rates after TFR performed with modular total femur prosthesis MML (Fa. ESKA/Orthodynamics) in patients with and without malignant disease.

Currently there is an increase in the use of bioprosthesis worldwide (> 70% according to national data of the Spanish Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery). There is conflicting evidence regarding the long-term survival of patients aged 50-65 years with mechanical (M) or biological (B) aortic prostheses. General consensus of greater complications associated with the use of long-life anticoagulation in M and of reoperation in B. Similar survival with lower MACCE complications in bioprosthesis could reconsider their choice in patients aged 50-65 years, specially in the current TAVI era. The investigators are going to perform a multicentric retrospective observational study (Registry) about 15 year-outcomes Following Bioprosthetic vs Mechanical Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Aged 50 to 65 Years in 30 Cardiovascular Surgery Centers in Spain