Active clinical trials for "Lung Diseases"

This study is designed to assess the effect of QVA149 (110/50 ug q.d.) versus placebo on pulmonary function and average physical activity levels in patients with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

This multicenter study will be conducted to compare the effect of FF/UMEC/VI with FF/VI plus UMEC on lung function after 24 weeks of treatment. This is a phase IIIB, 24-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel group multicenter study. This study will test the hypothesis that the difference in trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between treatment groups is less than or equal to a pre-specified non-inferiority margin. Alternatively, this study will also test the hypothesis that the difference between treatment groups is greater than the margin. The triple therapy of FF/UMEC/VI in a single inhaler is being developed with the aim of providing a new treatment option for the management of advanced Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Group D COPD which will reduce the exacerbation frequency, allow for a reduced burden of polypharmacy, convenience, and improve lung function, health related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptom control over established dual/monotherapies. This study has a 2 week run in period where subjects will continue to have their existing COPD medications. At randomization, subjects will discontinue all existing COPD medications and will be assigned to treatment of FF/UMEC/VI, 100 microgram (mcg)/62.5 mcg/25 mcg and placebo or FF/VI, 100 mcg/25 mcg and UMEC, 62.5 mcg in a 1:1 ratio for 24 weeks. Subjects will have clinical visits at Pre-Screening (Visit 0), Screening (Visit 1), Randomization (Week 0, Visit 2), Week 4 (Visit 3), Week 12 (Visit 4) and Week 24 (Visit 5). A follow-up visit will be conducted at 1 week after the end of treatment period or after early withdrawal visit. Approximately, 1020 subjects will be enrolled in this study. There will be two pharmacokinetic (PK) groups (subset A and subset B). Approximately 120 subjects will be assigned to subset A and approximately 60 subjects will be assigned to subset B. The total duration of subject participation will be approximately 27 weeks, consisting of a 2-week run-in period, 24-week treatment period and a 1-week follow-up period.

What are the differential effects of beta-blockers on lung and heart function during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? COPD is a major cause of illness and death. Not only do these individuals suffer from lung disease, but COPD often leads to other illnesses, particularly heart disease. Beta-blockers very successfully treat heart disease. It is therefore logical that one would want to use this treatment in COPD patients with heart disease too. However, there has always been concern that beta-blockers could cause significant problems in COPD by worsening lung function, as these can have the opposite effect to inhalers used to treat COPD that open up airways. Pointedly, there is increasing evidence that despite this problem, COPD patients who have been prescribed beta-blockers have been shown to gain benefit particularly in terms of preventing death. In this study, the investigators therefore want to examine which beta-blocker might be the safest for COPD patients, as each work slightly differently. Some beta-blockers may have a more beneficial effect on airways than others, whilst still benefitting the heart. The investigators will study two different beta-blockers; one that potentially narrows airways and one that potentially opens airways. The investigators will be using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (an exercise bike that measures both heart and lung function during exercise) to look for differences between both beta-blockers primarily in terms of lung function but also with information about the heart. The investigators will recruit people with moderate to severe COPD who are able to complete a cycle exercise test through their respiratory research department. The study will last for 10-12 weeks with 5 main visits to the department for serial exercise tests, breathing tests, simple heart function tests and simple blood tests that will tell the investigators what other effects these beta-blockers are having on the heart and lungs.

Dyspnea is the most reported symptom of patients with advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and is undertreated. Morphine is an effective treatment for dyspnea and is recommended in clinical practice guidelines, but questions concerning benefits and concerns about respiratory adverse effects remain. For example, the effect on health-related quality of life and functional capacity is unknown. In one-third of the patients oral sustained release morphine (morphine SR) doesn't relieve dyspnea and it remains unknown whether severity and descriptors of breathlessness may predict a response to morphine. Finally, cost-effectiveness of morphine SR in this patient group is unknown. Therefore, prescription of morphine to patients with COPD is limited. Objectives of this double blind randomized controlled trial are to study the effect of oral administration of morphine SR on health-related quality of life, respiratory adverse effects, and functional capacity; to explore whether description and severity of breathlessness are related with a clinically relevant response to morphine and to analyse the cost-effectiveness of morphine SR. The study population will consist of 124 clinically stable outpatients with COPD and severe dyspnea despite optimal pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of four times daily oscillatory Positive Expiratory Pressure (oPEP) (Aerobika ®) use over 4 weeks in individuals with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The investigators hypothesize that daily oPEP use will significantly improve St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, six-minute walk distance (6MWD) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after four weeks of four times daily administration.

Recent work have shown that low load, high-repetitive single limb resistance training, if compared to a control, can increase limb muscle function and functional exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) while avoiding the occurrence of limiting exertional symptoms. However, no comparison to another exercise regimen have been performed. In addition neither the intramuscular nor the mechanism of this exercise regimen have been investigated and represents the aim of the proposed project. We will in a prospective, assessor-blind; block randomized controlled, parallel-group trial compare single-limb to two-limb low load, high-repetitive resistance training in patients with severe and very severe COPD The research hypothesizes are: that single-limb low-load high-repetitive resistance training will provide larger gain in the 6-min walking distance than two-limb low-load high- repetitive resistance training in patients with severe to very severe (stage III-IV) COPD. that eight weeks of single limb training should also be associated with larger physiological (increased muscle endurance, less muscle fatigue and deoxygenation) and structural (muscle protein synthesis, fiber-type distribution and capillarization) muscle adaptations to training, lower cardio- respiratory demand, as well a greater increase in health-related quality of life in comparison to two-limbs simultaneous training. We will also compare the groups at baseline to investigate the acute effects and mechanisms of single-limb to two-limb low load, high-repetitive resistance training, a comparison that also will include healthy matched controls. The research hypothesizes are: that involving a large muscle mass during exercise (e.g., two-limb low load, high-repetition resistance training) compared to involving a small muscle mass during training (e.g., single limb low load, high-repetition resistance training) would lead to larger restraints on the cardiorespiratory system in patients with severe to very severe COPD. Conversely, single limb interventions should produce less dyspnea and more muscle deoxygenation and fatigue than two-limb simultaneous exercise while healthy controls will be able to perform both legs/arms exercise without a central constraint, and no negative consequences on muscle fatigue or exercise stimulus.

Primary objective: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of five days of oral corticosteroids (40 mg / day) for the treatment of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) in outpatients.

The aim of this study was to compare the tiotropium Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler and the HandiHaler in terms of their effects on sleeping oxygen saturation (SaO2) and sleep quality in patients with COPD.

The purpose of this research study is to learn about the safety of transplanting lungs obtained from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) that have been ventilated (attached to a breathing machine or ventilator to deliver oxygen) and perfused with a lung perfusion solution (Steen solution™, made by Vitrolife). This ventilation and perfusion will be done outside the body (ex-vivo) in a modified cardiopulmonary bypass circuit (the kind of device used routinely during most heart surgeries). The purpose of performing ex-vivo perfusion and ventilation is to learn how well the lungs work, and whether they are likely safe to transplant.

The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment. The primary criterion to assess efficacy will be the difference between the serial lung function measurements of patients who have been treated for 12 weeks with NVA237 versus those that have received placebo treatment for 12 weeks. A serial lung function measurement (FEV1 testing) will be conducted and the "area under the curve" will be the measure for the ability to breathe.