Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Embolism"

The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy (as measured by the rate of recurrent symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism [VTE] (i.e., Pulmonary thromboembolism [PE] and Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT])) and safety of GSK576428 as the initial treatment in subjects with acute PE in an open-label design.

You are admitted to hospital because of pulmonary embolism. You are treated with anticoagulants. The investigators know that, despite this treatment, pulmonary embolism can be a threat especially if heart function is compromized. The investigators investigate a well known study drug (epoprostenol) on top of regular treatment with anticoagulants, to see if heart function can be optimized

This study was designed to assess the safety of retrieval of the Bard Recovery® G2® Filter System. The G2 filter is an FDA-cleared device for inferior vena caval interruption in patients with pulmonary thromboembolism.

Oral anticoagulation is often initiated in hospitalized patients. Although the therapeutic range of phenprocoumon is narrow, the individual drug demands unfortunately vary greatly between persons. Our group recently developed two dosing algorithms for the initiation of anticoagulation based on clinical predictors such as age, gender, body weight and laboratory values. The aim of the proposed study is to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two algorithms in medical and orthopedic inpatients, as well as in a group of outpatients and possibly in a geriatric collective.

This study will test the hypothesis that patients with acute PE and dyspnea can safely inhale NO. The secondary hypothesis is that patients who are blinded to the inhaled NO concentration will sustain subjective improvement in their perception of dyspnea based upon their reported Borg dyspnea score, during inhalation of NO. Specific aims Test if patients with acute PE and shortness of breath of severity ≥ 5 on a 0-10 scale called the Borg score can have inhaled nitric oxide administered via nasal cannula or face mask in a titration protocol that increases concentration by 5 ppm in 5 min steps to a maximum of 25 ppm. We will measure the number of patients who meet an absolute safety endpoint during titration. An absolute safety endpoint requires execution of a rapid weaning protocol (2 ppm decrease per minute to 0 ppm). Absolute safety endpoints: Two consecutive SBP measurements more than one min apart with both readings < 80 mm Hg;SaO 2 <80% for more than 15 seconds; Patient deterioration as defined by: Clinical decision for need of inotropic or pressor support for any reason, seizure, new altered mental status, focal neurological signs suggestive of cerebral ischemia, evidence of myocardial ischemia, protracted vomiting. Test if the patient-reported Borg score decreases with administration of NO. Patients will not be told any details about the timing of the titration and will not be made aware of their iNO concentration when the Borg score is assessed.

Objectives are to evaluate whether idrabiotaparinux sodium (SSR126517E) is as least as effective as a standard warfarin treatment to prevent recurrence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients with symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and to assess its safety (bleedings) versus warfarin.

This pilot study is mainly aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the percutaneous Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy (ART) in patients presenting a MPE. Secondarily the effectiveness of this treatment modality will also be estimated.

Venous thromboembolism affects around 10 million people per year worldwide, however, despite its high incidence, there is no systematic review or randomized trial focused on the treatment of patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or or pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. The objective was to compare the use of Rivaroxaban plus Aspirin versus Acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism treated with rivaroxaban.

The objective is to determine the optimum dose of thrombolytic and duration of the ultrasound procedure (together defined as the APT Procedure) as a treatment for acute submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). Symptomatic submassive PE are participants with acute (less than or equal to [≤]14 days) PE with normal systemic arterial blood pressure (greater than [>] 90 mmHg) and evidence of RV dysfunction (right ventricular to left ventricular diameter ratio, that is; RV/LV ratio greater than or equal to [≥] 0.9). Participants with submassive PE will be randomized to one of four APT treatment groups: ultrasound of 2 and 6 hours (hrs) with r-tPA 2 milligrams (mg)/hr/catheter and ultrasound 4 and 6 hours with r-tPA, 1 mg/hr/catheter. On 08 June 2016, randomization into treatment group 4 (APT/6 hours-r-tPA/2 mg/hr/catheter) was closed following a reported intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and death in a study participant in this arm.

The primary objective is to demonstrate the clinical benefits of an active strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of PE compared to usual care in patients with unexplained exacerbations of COPD who require hospital admission. The secondary objective is to assess the safety of an active strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of PE compared to usual care in patients with unexplained exacerbations of COPD who require hospital admission.