Active clinical trials for "Pulmonary Embolism"

The aim of the present study is to monitor anticoagulant therapy by anti-Xa assay and correlate its level to the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Following the implementation of SPECT V/Q imaging for PE diagnosis, the investigators previously conducted an observational study over the period 2011-2013 that showed the safety of a diagnostic management based on SPECT V/Q to rule out PE. However, PE prevalence was high (28%), which may seem a bit high as compared with other recent studies. The hypothesis was that the use of SPECT V/Q may be responsible for an overdiagnosis of PE, especially at the implementation phase of the test. The aim of this study was to perform a time trend analysis of the evolution over the years of PE diagnosis with SPECT V/Q.

Based on data on a cohort of 2,141 patients undergoing elective colonic cancer resection in an ERAS program, the incidence of postoperative thromboembolic events is estimated in patients no receiving prolonged thromboembolic prophylaxis.

Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.

The pulmonary embolism (PE) causes a blockade of the pulmonary arteries typical due to a thrombus which is formed in the lower region of the body or pretty rare to other materials (tumor, air, fat). The working group plans to evaluate the pathology of the thromboembolism in the case of a partial, subtotal or even total pulmonary embolism. The acute PE is still often in the adult population and in many accompanied by death. Etiological the problem occurs through an acute right ventricular failure and leads into severe pulmonal perfusion disorder with shock and hypoxemia. The right diagnose is pretty hard in the clinical day because all symptoms are common and unspecific. To provide the best treatment in short time it is needed to sum up all the symptoms and evaluate the risk of an acute pulmonary embolism and it's morbidity. The easiest and fastest way treating a PE is to apply a systemic intravenous thrombolysis but bleeding complications are the most common and most frequently side effects. The decision-making process in patients without shock is pretty hard because of having no clear diagnose. Lab parameters and imaging (CT angiography) is important for the best decision in critical ill PE patients but time is sometimes missing. A possible new biomarker in identifying a PE is adrenomedullin. Elevated adenomedullin levels in septic patients with left ventricular heart failure, severe dyspnoea and intubated patients are well known, but in the case of PE it wasn't analysed yet. Human adrenomedullin is a protein with 52 amino acid which is produced in the lung and first extracted in the adrenal gland. The sequence homology is pretty similar to the Calcitonin-Gene-Related-Peptide (CGRP)-protein superfamily (vasodilatation). Its precursor is named pro-adrenomedullin peptide and it shows a significant weaker vasodilatation activity compaired to adrenomedullin. Adrenomedullin causes severe hypotonia in scientific studies where it was applied as an intravenous bolus or infusion. This vasodilatation effect concern to the systemic and as well in the pulmonary circulation. Its vasodilatation mechanism is not clarified yet. The trial is defined as an prospective study, where the investigators would like to measure/analyse the adrenomeulline level in PE patients in the intermediate high and high risk population. The diagnose and treatment of the patients is fixed to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations of the cardiology society of 2019 Guidelines on Acute Pulmonary Embolism (Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Embolism).

Monocentric study for the evaluation of a whole body CZT scintigraphy system.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of malignancies, in particular to lung cancer. Patients with lung cancer in surgical and medical departments are at high risk of VTE development. Prophylaxis is one major way to to prevent it. Currently, VTE prophylaxis is mainly based on VTE-risk assessment. However, all patients hospitalized for cancer are at intermediate or high risk of VTE but their bleeding risk vary. To improve effect of VTE prophylaxis and reduce bleeding events in patients with lung cancer, we will conduct an open-label parallel randomized clinical tria to assess the effect of bleeding risk based prophylaxis strategy among lung cancer patients. We hypothesize that VTE prophylaxis based on bleeding risk assessment with a short post-discharge treatment course is superior to VTE propohylaxis based on VTE risk assessment among hospitalized patients with lung cancer A sample of 3200 eligible patients will be randomized into experimental or control group with an allocation rate of 1:1. Stratified by medical/surgical units, block randomization with a varying block size of 4 or 6 will be adopted to randomize patients into experimental or control group. In experimental group, patients will undergo bleeding risk assessment and receive prophylaxis according to bleeding risk during hospitalization, and they will also receive an extended pharmacological prophylaxis of 5mg Rivaroxaban once daily for up to 15 consecutive days after discharge. In control group, patients will receive routine VTE prophylaxis, VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis if indicated during hospitalization according to current policies for hospitals in China but no further treatment prophylaxis after discharge. Patients in both groups will be followed up for 30 days. The primary outcome is symptomatic and asymptomatic objectively proven VTE (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE)) within 30 days after initiation of randomization. Ultrasound and CTPA will be performed to detect DVT and PE, respectively. Clinically relevant bleeding (non-major clinically relevant and major bleeding, HIT) and death are secondary outcomes.

The main goals of EuroPE-CDT is to assess the currently applied catheter-directed treatment (CTD) techniques and strategies in pulmonary embolism (PE) patients and to determine the short term efficacy and safety of this invasive procedure.

The results of the Prolong study, currently submitted for publication, show that patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolic event who have altered D-dimer levels, measured one month after anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists is stopped, have a high rate of recurrences (about 14%) and a prolongation of anticoagulation is effective in reducing significantly this rate. Those patients with normal D-dimer (about 60% of all patients examined) have a low rate of recurrences (about 5%) and likely a prolongation of anticoagulation in all these patients cannot be recommended. In line with these results, the Prolong-Two study aims at assessing the predictive role for recurrence of D-dimer levels measured: a) during anticoagulation, b) one month after its withdrawal and c) periodically during follow up. Patients with a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (including proximal deep vein thrombosis of a leg and/or pulmonary embolism) which are treated with vitamin K antagonists for not less than 6 months are considered for the study. D-dimer assay is performed during anticoagulation and patients with altered results continue the anticoagulation for 6 more months. Those with normal D-dimer stop the anticoagulant treatment and are again examined one month later. Anticoagulation is resumed for 6 more months in those patients with abnormal D-dimer results but is permanently stopped in those with a normal assay. The latter patients are examined and D-dimer assay performed again every two months to evaluate the natural history of the assay after anticoagulation is stopped and the possible predictive value for recurrence of a change of the assay during follow-up from normal to abnormal results.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the need for thromboprophylaxis in patients with a fracture of the lower extremity being treated conservatively in a below-knee plaster cast and to assess if both of the two tested prophylactic treatments are effective for this indication. Hypothesis: Nadroparine and Fondaparinux are both effective in preventing a thromboembolic event in patients with a nonsurgical fracture of a lower extremity immobilised in a below-knee plaster cast.