Active clinical trials for "Lung Neoplasms"

The purpose of this study is to observe the clinical effect and safety of Recombinant Human Endostatin in non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis

This research study is evaluating Lorlatinib in combination with Crizotinib, Binimetinib, or TNO155 as a possible treatment for either anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer or ROS1-positive lung cancer. This research study involves four study drugs. Lorlatinib Binimetinib Crizotinib TNO155

Surgery is the first choice of treatment for early-stage primary pulmonary malignancies, but up to 15% of all patients, and 33% of patients greater than 75 years of age, are not surgical candidate's due to locally advanced disease, poor cardiopulmonary reserve and significant medical co-morbidities. Some patients are also unwilling to undergo surgery. This has prompted the development of alternatives to surgery so that local control of unresectable tumors can be achieved. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is currently an alternative therapy for these patients with 3-year survival rates of between 42 and 60%. SBRT has excellent local control rates and a favorable toxicity profile relative to other surgical and non-surgical therapies. Radiation pneumonitis (RP), amongst others, is one of the major toxicities which can limit the maximal radiation dose that can be safely delivered to thoracic tumors. Reported rates of SBRT induced RP requiring clinical intervention range from 0% to 29% and life-threatening toxicities have been reported in up to 12% of cases in various studies. The potential for toxicities from SBRT could limit the number of times a patient could be treated with SBRT for residual, recurrent or new pulmonary lesions over time. Following the first report of thermal ablation for lung malignancies in 2000, this modality has been used to treat primary and secondary malignancies and has emerged as an effective, low-cost, safe and repeatable alternative to SBRT for local tumour control. The most widely practised technique is radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Microwave ablation (MWA) is a relatively new therapy and offers all the advantages of RFA, but with significant additional advantages 3. These include reduced procedure times, lower complication rates, increased ablative temperatures, improved propagation of thermal energy particularly in the lung, improved efficacy in lesions that are in close proximity to blood vessels due to reduced heat-sink effect, and less procedure associated pain 2,3. Using high energy MWA to treat 87 pulmonary tumors, Egashira et al achieved a primary technical success rate of 94% and technique effectiveness of 98% at a median of 15 months. MWA is performed by Interventional Radiologists using CT guidance. The treatment is performed under general anaesthesia and is repeatable. Multiple lesions can be ablated in one treatment session. Patients can potentially be discharged the same day of treatment, if there are no adverse events. MWA is a relatively new treatment option that could be considered in situations where the patient is not a candidate for further treatment with surgery, SBRT or chemotherapy, or the patient declines the recommended standard available treatments. Objectives for Phase I: The primary objective for Phase I of this study will be to demonstrate the Safety of MWA performed for treatment of lung malignancy in patients not suitable for surgery, chemotherapy or SBRT. Primary objective (Safety): to determine the proportion of patients experiencing local adverse events at one week definitively related to the mwa procedure. Secondary objective (Feasibility): To determine the proportion of patients in whom technical success of MWA was achieved by assessing completion of ablation on CT at the time of the procedure, indicated by replacement of tumor by ground glass change (including a 5mm ablation zone in normal surrounding lung parenchyma). Objectives for Phase II Primary objective (Efficacy): To demonstrate efficacy by measuring the proportion of patients demonstrating absence of residual tumor on follow up CT at 1 month after MWA. Secondary objective: To determine the proportion of patients needing re-treatment for recurrent tumor at 1 month post MWA.

To evaluate the progression free survival of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer treated with anlotinib combined with EP/CE regimen

In recent years, with the progress in the treatment field, NSCLC has become the most successful cancer species in precision medicine. Patients with positive driving genes such as EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF and so on have clearly targeted drugs, which bring survival benefits to patients.However, about 50% of patients still lack a clear driving gene target, which has become the focus of current research.In the field of wild-type NSCLC with negative driver genes, the classic first-line treatment regimen is the two-drug regimen containing platinum.he phase II clinical study of pemetrexed in the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with pemetrexed versus carboplatin pemetrexed showed that the median PFS time in the pemetrexed group was 3.5 months. Anlotinib is a multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in domestic research and development.In the phase Ⅲ study, patients who failed at least two kinds of systemic chemotherapy (third line or beyond) or drug intolerance were treated with anlotinib or placebo, the anlotinib group PFS and OS were 5.37 months and 9.63 months, the placebo group PFS and OS were 1.4 months and 6.3 months. The efficacy and safety of anrotinib combined with pemetrexed in the second-line treatment of advanced non-squamous and non-small cell patients deserve further exploration.

Gefitinib is currently the standard-of-care for patients with activating-EGFR mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, ~30-40% patients are still nonresponsive, and experience significantly varying duration of response and survival rate. Anlotinib is an efficient multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that effectively block the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells and reduce tumor microvascular density by targeting VEGFRs, FGFRs, PDGFRs. It has been proved to be safe and effective in advanced lung cancer after second-line standard chemotherapy failure, which can significantly extend the survival of patients and approves as a third-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. Here, we prepared to evaluate whether the combination of gefitinb and anlotinib can preferably improved survival of untreated NSCLC with EGFR activating mutation.

To assess the safety and efficacy of third-line and above therapy of patients with local advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with combined treatment with launched recombinant humanized anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody and Donafenib Tosilate

The study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the anti-MUC1 CAR T cells and /or PD-1 knockout engineered T cells for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

To evaluates the effectiveness and safety of Toripalimab combined with Anlotinib and chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, and maintenance therapy are Toripalimab combined with Anlotinib.

This project is to to explore the safety and efficacy of shr-1210 combined with albumin, paclitaxel and carboplatin in the first-line treatment of extensive small cell lung cancer