Active clinical trials for "Pulpitis"

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of combination of biodentine with simvastatin as a pulpotomy agent for vital primary molars clinically and radiographically. Study design: 60 primary molars in 20 children aged 4-7 years old were randomly allocated to three groups, Biodentine, Simvastatin and combination of Biodentine and simvastatin. Clinical and radiographic examinations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. Key words: Pulpotomy, Primary teeth, Biodentine, Simvastatin.

Although many pulpotomy agents are commercially available, there is a dearth of clinical research comparing the efficacy of these agents in treating individuals with irreversible pulpitis. Bioceramic and MTA both have similar clinical uses, but Bioceramic is distinguished from MTA by its superior chemical, physical, and biological properties. This study aims to address this knowledge deficit by assessing the performance of biocompatible materials in pulpotomy procedures for the treatment of symptomatic permanent teeth in adults with deep caries. For permanent teeth with a completed root and a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis without apical periodontitis, this research will compare the success rates of MTA and EBRRM pulpotomy procedures in order to provide evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of this disease.

Post-obturation pain evaluation(Part 1): One hundred asymptomatic mandibular molar teeth with vital pulp were randomly assigned into two groups according to the sealer used MTA Fillapex (Angelus Odontologica Industries SA, Londrina, PR, Brazil) or AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) sealer. WaveOne Gold instruments were used for root canal preparations in both groups. Root canals were obturated with the manufacturer advised own gutta-percha points of preparation technique and MTA Fillapex was used in the first group and AH Plus was used in the second group as a root canal sealer. Postoperative pain at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 30 days after root canal treatment was measured with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and patients were informed to record the number of analgesics they used during these time periods. Clinical and radiological outcome evaluation(Part 2): Patients were recalled for clinical and radiographic examinations at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. The clinical outcome was determined as success or failure according to objective evaluation of symptoms of inflammation or infection. In clinical examination at follow-up appointments, swelling, pain, sinus tract, tenderness to percussion, and/or palpation test, periodontal probing depths were determined and recorded. The radiographic outcome was evaluated and classified according to the Strindberg criteria. Teeth with a normal contour, width, and structure of the periodontal ligament were considered as"successful" and teeth with a widened periodontal contours or a new periapical radiolucency were considered as "failed". Additionally, the other parameters (age, gender, tooth number, apical gutta level) on treatment success were examined.

68 healthy patients pulpitis and requiring root canal therapy are selected. . Sampling was done in a simple and non-experimental way from a dental clinic in Isfahan, and then the samples were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups (A, B) using simple random numbers. Each vial is filled with distilled water or magnesium sulfate by an individual who is unaware of the nature of the design and is not involved in the design, and each letter A or B is written. This statement is not decoded after the statistical examination. Therefore, the study is blind and blind. In this way, 60 patients are examined in 2 groups of 34 First, patients with recognized pulpitis in mandibular posterior teeth have been identified and information about them is given. Patients will be introduced to the executive phase after the required explanation and clarification of the ambiguity and written consent. After completing the patient information form by the practitioner and complying with all entry and exit criteria, the study begins on each patient. The patient records his pain as an initial pain on the Heath-Parker Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This pain measurement method involves a 180 mm line with descriptive words that differentiates patients on a line where the best describes their pain. In order to design a standard injection of the maxillary nerve block in all patients, using Aspirating Dental Injection Syringe, Novocol Ontario, Canada, the needle of the 27 mm long 35 mm (Septoject, Septodont, Saint-Maur-des- Fosses cedex, France) Lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 80000/1 mixed with magnesium sulfate or distilled water, injections in the retro-cell region and cm1 above the occlusal mandibular plan. After insertion of the needle at a rate of 3-5 mm into the tissue, aspiration was performed and about 2-3 ml / 2. It is injected from the contents of the cartridge, the syringe 1 mm is returned to the bone hard tissue (in the form of the syringe body in the perimmel area of the opposite side), and after the aspiration of the contents of each cartridge in a 1 minute period It is injected. After 15 minutes, in case of numbness of the lips, the patient begins to study and the access cavity begins on the desired tooth. In each of the stages of acquiring the access cavity or entering the initial file to the canal, in the event of pain, the treatment is suspended and the patient signs his pain on the pain assessment chart based on the Heft-parker VAS and at this stage the study It's over. In the absence of anesthetized lips, the patient is excluded from the study and after completing the injection, the root canal is given.

The irreversible acute pulpitis is the most common emergency at the hospital during dental consultation. Pulpitis are characterized by intense and spontaneous oro-facial pains. In case of mandibular molar, the emergency treatment consists in realizing a pulpotomy (eviction of cameral pulp) under locoregional anesthesia called inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB). The latter represents a real challenge, since inflammation may decrease its action. To mitigate this deficiency and the drawbacks of the IANB (onset and duration of the anesthesia, bites risk reported with IANB) other anesthesias are proposed. In particular the computerized intraosseous technique anesthesia of which the Quicksleeper™ system is a part. However, according to the observers, a mild to severe tachycardia have been reported. Very few valid clinical trials exists on the subject, most being realized with systems of intraosseous anesthesia other than Quicksleeper™. Therefore, the aim of this study is first to analyze the variations of the cardiovascular parameters into two groups of anesthesia: locoregional anesthesia and Quicksleeper ™ system; and then, to compare the efficiency, side effects, operating consequences of both techniques. This study should provide better data about potential risk with computerized intraosseous technique such has Quicksleeper ™ system in healthy or cardiovascular risk patient.

Purpose: The aim of this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effect of oral premedication of dexamethasone, ketorolac, meloxicam, ibuprofen or placebo on the success of inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANB) of mandibular posterior teeth in patients experiencing symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Methods: The trial will include five study groups, each consists of 50 patients who exhibits symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular first or second molar. The patients will receive identically appearing capsules containing either dexamethasone 0.5 mg, ketorolac 10 mg, meloxicam 7.5 mg, ibuprofen 600 mg, or placebo by mouth 60 minutes before the administration of an IANB. Endodontic access will begin 15 minutes after completion of the IANB. The IANB success is defined as no or mild pain (Heft Parker visual analog scale recordings) on pulpal access or instrumentation.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the success of inferior alveolar nerve block, after the local application of Mepivacaine plus Tramadol in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Also, to evaluate the duration of the anesthetic effect when using Mepivacaine plus Tramadol in the same anesthetic technique and patients group. Hypothesis: Local application of mepivacaine plus tramadol increases the successful of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

The purpose of this trial is to study the ability of a frequently used dental anesthetic (articaine) to achieve complete numbness of a diseased tooth with the most commonly used injection technique in the lower jaw (inferior alveolar nerve block: IANB). If this technique fails, a commonly used supplemental (SUP) technique with one of two possible dental anesthetics (lidocaine or articaine) will be given to evaluate the success/failure of complete numbness between the two anesthetics. Standardized administration of anesthesia is provided by controlled delivery using Midwest Comfort Control Syringe. The investigators hypothesize that supplemental infiltration anesthesia with articaine will give the same success rate as lidocaine in achieving complete pulpal anesthesia in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits. This study consisted of two periods of patient enrollment, treatment and data collection: Part I: 101 subjects; Part II: 100 subjects.

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative administration of alprazolam on the success of the IAN block for teeth with irreversible pulpitis.

To compare the effect of different VPT methods using Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement for management of human dental pulp with irreversible pulpitis.