Active clinical trials for "Radiculopathy"

Lumbar epidural injection is used in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. There are three different application methods: lateral parasagittal, midline interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injection. Investigator aimed to compare lateral parasagittal and transforaminal epidural injection methods. The purpose of the study is to determine which method is more efficient.

The purpose of this study is firstly to determine the efficacy of cervical plate for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using cervical cage, and secondly to investigate the determining factors for surgical outcomes.

Several studies have implicated involvement of sigma-1 receptors (SR1s) in the generation of chronic pain, while others are investigating anti SR1 drugs for treatment of chronic pain. Using [18F]-FTC-146 and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI), the investigators hope to identify the source of pain generation in patients with chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to compare the uptake of [18F]FTC-146 in healthy volunteers to that of individuals suffering from chronic pain.

Lumbar radiculopathy is a relevant cause of disability and morbidity, accounting for between 23 and 57% of the cases of patients with low back pain and representing a significant expense due to the sick leave and health care that may be required. Nuclear magnetic resonance and electromyography are the most commonly used tests for the diagnosis of the pathology. Neurodynamic tests represent a sequence of structured movements with the purpose of increasing the mechanical stress of the neural tissue. These tests are currently an important aspect of the physical examination of the patient when there is suspicion of neural involvement, allowing the physiological and mechanical capacities of the nerve to be evaluated. The Slump and Straight Leg Raise neurodynamic tests are the two best known tests for assessing the mechanosensitivity of the sciatic nerve and its component roots. The hypothesis of this observational study is that the straight leg raising and Slump neurodynamic tests with precise diagnostic criteria are valid tools for the diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy.

Nerve compression due to lumbar disc herniation and related radicular pain is a very common condition when the lifetime prevalence is considered. Lumbosacral radicular pain can be defined as pain originating from the lumbar level and spreading to the lower extremities along the distribution area of one or more spinal nerves. It is thought that the mechanical pressure of the disc material herniated to the dorsal nerve root or ganglion or the inflammation created by the chemokines and enzymes in the disc are involved in the pain formation mechanism. Various methods such as medical agents, physical therapy modalities, epidural steroid injections and surgical methods can be used in the treatment of the related condition. Epidural injections have been used for the treatment of lower back and lower extremity pain since about 1900. Epidural injections exert their effects through the anti-inflammatory and neural membrane stabilizing effects of steroids, as well as by local anesthetics increasing blood flow to the ischemic spinal root and by the removal of cytokines from the area by the injection material. Epidural injections can be performed with various different approaches, including caudal, interlaminar and transforaminal. Among these approaches, the transforaminal approach is the most recently developed approach in the late 1990s, which allows drugs to be administered directly to the pathology area. The effect of obesity, which is one of the factors thought to predispose to low back pain and lumbosacral radicular pain, has been evaluated in various studies and it has been found that it is positively correlated with low back pain and is an independent risk factor for lumbar herniation. So, does obesity have an effect on the success of transforaminal epidural steroid injection treatment? According to the literature, no significant effect on treatment success has been demonstrated. Although the body mass index, which is used in the evaluation of obesity, has provided us important information about the health of the person in general for a long time, it is now thought to lead to an incomplete assessment. Because it does not provide information about body composition ratios (fat amount / lean body mass). Studies have shown that there is a high correlation between the percentage of body fat and the thickness of the subcutaneous fat tissue in the lumbar region, and there is a significant relationship between the lumbar region subcutaneous fat tissue thickness (especially L1-L2 level) and the degree of intervertebral disc degeneration and vertebral surface change. From this point of view, in another study, the L1-L2 disc level subcutaneous fat tissue thickness, was called the subcutaneous fat index, and the cut-off values that showed a significant relationship with spinal degeneration were determined. In the study we planned, in cases of spinal radicular pain (etiologically caused by intervertebral disc herniation), body mass index, lumbar level subcutaneous fat tissue thickness and subcutaneous fat index data whether be or be not correlated with treatment effectiveness/success in patients who received transforaminal epidural steroid injection, and if so, the level of significance intended to work. Before applying for surgery, we aim to develop a practical approach that can be used by relevant clinicians and contribute to the literature, which can predict 'what level of treatment success can we achieve in which patient?' with this injection method.

For the wellness by Comparing of Cervical Traction Versus Snag to reduce Pain and improve Quality of Life in Cervical Radiculopathy

To evaluate the efficacy of usage of High-voltage pulsed radiofrequency on DRG in comparison to standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency intervention in patients with chronic lumbosacral radicular pain

Rationale: Treatment with transforaminal epidural injections is part of usual care in patients suffering from lumbar radiculopathy. However, not all patients experience a satisfactory result from this treatment and it is unclear what percentage of patients responds well and if any clinical or radiological factors exist that predict a positive response. Objectives: Primary: to develop a model based on demographic, clinical and radiological parameters for prediction of treatment success after TEI Secondary: to estimate the short-term efficacy of TEI in patients with LDH and spinal stenosis based on pain, functionality and perceived recovery scores, to determine the correlation between clinical and radiological baseline parameters and physical and psychological patient outcome measures, to determine the rate of additional injections and rate of surgery after treatment with TEI, to determine the short-term (cost)effectiveness of TEI on physical and psychological patient outcome measures, and to determine the rate of complications associated with TEI Study design: Prospective cohort study Study population: Patients that are scheduled for TEI as part of usual care suffering from a new episode of lumbar radiculopathy Main study parameters/endpoints: leg and back pain scores at baseline, 30 minutes, 2 and 6 weeks after treatment. ODI, HADS, Quality of Life and PCI at baseline, 2 and 6 weeks after treatment. Perceived recovery at 2 and 6 weeks after treatment. Usage of healthcare at baseline, 2 and 6 weeks after treatment.

Study Purpose: This study is intended to monitor outcomes for 1 year following cervical TFESI. Based on current clinic volume and enrollment rates into a current study of cervical epidural injections that is nearing completion, we conservatively estimate a study enrollment period of 18 months and a total period of 2.5 years from enrollment to final follow-up data collection. If the study were to theoretically start enrolling in July 2019, we would anticipate completion by February 2022. Objectives: Determine the proportion of patients with an 80% or greater improvement in arm and neck numerical rating scale pain (NRS) score following an initial cervical transforaminal steroid injection (TFESI) at 4 weeks post-injection and the duration of response up to 12 months. Determine the proportion of patients with a 50%-79% improvement in arm and neck NRS score following an initial cervical TFESI at 4 weeks post-injection and the duration of response up to 12 months. Determine the proportion of patients with less than 50% improvement in arm and neck NRS score following an initial cervical TFESI at 4 weeks post-injection and the duration of response up to 12 months. Determine the proportion of patients with an initial injection plus up to 3 additional injections that maintain 80% or greater, as well as 50-79%, improvement in arm and neck NRS score for up to 12 months. Determine the proportion of patients with a clinically significant change in function defined by a minimally clinically significant change (MCIC) (≥10 point improvement ) or 30% improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score following an initial cervical TFESI at 4 weeks post-injection and the duration of response up to 12 months. Determine the proportion of patients with clinically significant improvement in the Medication Quantification Scale (MQS III) score (≥6.8 point change , equivalent to 10 oral morphine equivalents ) following an initial cervical TFESI at 4 weeks post-injection and the duration of response up to 12 months. 6. Determine the proportion of patients with clinically significant improvement in the categorical EuroQol 5 Dimensions tool (EQ-5D) defined by ≥0.03 following an initial cervical TFESI at 4 weeks post-injection and the duration of response up to 12 months. 7. Compare patient demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics between response groups and perform predictive modeling to better understand variables that increase the likelihood of a successful clinical outcome. 8. Report adverse effects.

As a part of the current rheumatological practice skills, epidural injections through the sacrococcygeal hiatus take part in the strategy for managing radicular diseases. This technical act is easily performed in an outpatient context since it is a brief procedure, performed under clinical and ultrasound control, with good tolerance. Nevertheless, epidural injections by the way of the sacrococcygeal hiatus can be responsible of anxiety for the patient and meet the definition of pain induced by treatment. Among the non-pharmacological methods that can be offered to the patient in this context, hypnosis and distraction allow psycho-corporal support acting on certain factors influencing the painful experience of the gesture: duration of the gesture, calm and pleasant environment, etc... That is the context in which the use of virtual reality is of interest. Its use in supporting procedures generating induced pain has already been evaluated in several studies, in particular in the fields of surgery and anaesthesiology. The use of a virtual reality device also seems suitable in the context of epidural injections, but this theoretical and plausible interest remains to be demonstrated. To our knowledge, the literature on the use of a virtual reality headset to support invasive procedures in rheumatology remains poorly developed. The objective of this study is therefore to assess the interest of using a virtual reality headset in the support of pain relief and the management of peri-procedural anxiety when performing epidural injections through the sacrococcygeal hiatus.