Active clinical trials for "Radiculopathy"

The study will be a randomized clinical trial with a sample size of 44 to determine the effects of thoracic mobility versus thoracic stretching exercises on pain, range of motion, and function in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Subjects will be enrolled according to inclusion-exclusion criteria. Patients will be divided into two groups, each with 22 patients. Group A will receive thoracic mobility exercises along with conventional physical therapy while group B will receive thoracic stretching exercises along with the conventional physical therapy protocol. The conventional physical therapy protocol will include a hot pack, neck Traction, and stretches. The session will be around 30 to 45 min for each patient with three sessions per week on alternate days. A total of Three weeks of treatment regime will be given to the patients and an assessment of patient's pain, range of motion, and function with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), goniometry and Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be done at the baseline, after the completion of treatment at three weeks and after six weeks to observe the long-term effects. will be analyzed by using SPSS version 25

Neck pain is a frequently reported complaint of the musculoskeletal system which generally has a huge impact on health care expenditure; ascribed to visits to health care providers, disability, and sick leaves. A variety of manual therapy techniques including Cervical traction (CT) and neural mobilization techniques (NMTs) have been prescribed in the management of CR because of their immediate analgesic effect. Both techniques have been proposed to reduce pain and functional limitations in CR. Traction increases the separation of the vertebral bodies which eventually reduces the central pressure in the disk space and encourages the disk nucleus to get back to a central position. The current literature lends assistance to the utilization of the traction in addition to other physical therapy procedures for pain reduction, with less significant impact on function and disability. Further studies should investigate to explore the most effective traction method and dosage, the subgroups of patients with CR, or the pain stage (acute, subacute, or chronic) most benefited by this intervention and the physical therapy procedures that yield the most effective outcomes when combined with traction.

The goal of this proposed research is to assess the preliminary efficacy of dietary interventions that change dietary fats in improving clinical outcomes related to lumbar radicular pain. After a two-week baseline, consented participants are randomized to one of two diets. Key foods consistent with the diet are provided for 12 weeks along with extensive dietary counseling and support from the study-provided materials. Participants are encouraged to follow the assigned diet for another 6 weeks without provision of food. Participants complete questionnaires at baseline, randomization, and after 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks on the diet. They provide blood samples at randomization (2 weeks) and after 12 and 18 weeks on the diet.

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone for transforaminal epidural steroid injection. A secondary aim of this study is to obtain data on the lowest most effective dose of dexamethasone for this treatment and the effective duration of effect.

The purpose of this study is to investigate effects of soft tissue mobilization versus therapeutic ultrasound in subjects with neck and arm pain who demonstrate neural mechanical sensitivity.

Cervical radicular pain is a common, disabling problem, occurs in 83:100,000 individuals per year. Symptoms are most often caused by intervertebral disc herniation (21.9%) or central or foraminal stenosis from spondylosis (68.4%). Patients complain of pain in the head, neck, scapula or arm. The diagnosis of radicular pain is made clinically by history and physical examination, supported by imaging studies and electrodiagnostic tests. No study has compared the differences in pain, medication utilization, functional outcomes, or patient satisfaction between interlaminar and targeted epidural injections in the cervical spine. In theory, the technique of targeted epidural steroid delivery with a catheter has a lower risk of accidental vascular trespass or disc penetration during the procedure, and far less risk of dural penetration or spinal cord injury at rostral levels of the cervical spinal cord as compared with the interlaminar technique. The investigators hypothesize that this technique results in superior pain control, decreased medication use, improved function and fewer repeat injections. This data could improve patient safety and affect the evolving treatment guidelines for cervical epidural injections.

Many patients with cervical disc disease have long-lasting and complex symptoms with chronic pain, low levels of physical and psychological function and sick-leave. Surgery on a few segmental levels might be expected to solve the disc-specific pain but not the non-specific neck pain and the patients'illness. As much as 2/3 of the patients have been reported to have remaining physical/ psychological disability long-term after surgery. A structured physiotherapy programme after surgery may improve patients'function and return to work. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate what a well structured rehabilitation program adds to the customary treatment after surgery for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease in respect to function, disability, workability and cost effectiveness. The study is a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre study, with an independent and blinded investigator comparing two alternatives of rehabilitation. 200 patients in working age, with cervical disc disease with clinical findings and symptoms of cervical nerve root compression will be included after informed consent. After inclusion in the study patients will be randomised to one out of the two alternatives of physiotherapy, (A) customary treatment (information/ advice on the specialist clinic) or (A+B) active physiotherapy; standardised and structured program of neck specific exercises combined with a behavioural approach plus customary treatment. Patients will be evaluated both clinically and with questionnaires before surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Main outcome variable are neck specific disability. Cost-effectiveness will be calculated. The inclusion will preliminary be closed 2012. The study could contribute to a better clinical decision making, a better health care which will reduce physical, mental and social costs for the patients, and improve the rates of patients returning to and staying at work.

The primary objective of this randomised clinical trial (RCT) is to compare, in terms of disability and pain, an intervention targeting the opening of intervertebral foramens to a conventional physiotherapy intervention, in patients presenting acute or subacute cervical radiculopathies. Based on biomechanical principles, the investigators hypothesis is that the intervention targeting the opening of intervertebral foramens will be significantly more effective in reducing pain and disability than the conventional physiotherapy intervention. This study is double-blind RCT that will allow the comparison of patients with a cervical radiculopathy randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will receive a 4-week rehabilitation program targeting the opening of intervertebral foramen, and the second group will receive a 4-week conventional rehabilitation program. Thirty-six subjects will be recruited from participating medical and physiotherapy clinics in the Quebec City area (Canada) and will be evaluated at baseline, at the end of the program and four weeks following the end of the program. The primary outcome measure will be the validated Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire and other secondary measures will include the QuickDASH questionnaire, a numerical pain rating scale, cervicothoracic mobility and patients' perceived global rating of change.

The study is a randomized, double blind, cross-over study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CNV1014802 in subjects with neuropathic pain from lumbosacral radiculopathy.

The median Orthopaedic surgery wait time in Canada is 36.7 weeks (Esmail 2008), thus there is a need to find alternative treatments for pathologies such as lumbar disc herniations (LDH). The literature has demonstrated that selective nerve root injections (SNRI) are able to alleviate sciatic symptoms caused by LDH (Riew 2006) and may be beneficial as an alternative to surgery. It is necessary to determine whether SNRIs provide significant symptom resolution alleviating the need for surgery, or to determine if their success is transient and delays the time to surgery. The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the success of SNRI in patients suffering with LDH and to determine which factors influence outcome. Over the span of 2 years, data from 100 patients will be collected. These patients will be surgical candidates and have exhausted all non-operative measures prior to receiving a SNRI. Upon first assessment, each eligible patient will be randomly assigned to the treatment (steroid) or control (saline) group. The patient and all treating physicians will be blinded to the treatment given. Each patient will be followed over their course of treatment and information pertaining to their pain and symptoms will be recorded using standard questionnaires. Patient demographics, diagnosis, Worker's Compensation status, spinal levels treatment/outcome, and time from referral to treatment will also be evaluated. The primary outcome measure will be defined as the avoidance of surgery.