Active clinical trials for "Rectal Neoplasms"

Early cancers of the rectum can be removed safely through the anus without subjecting patients to major abdominal surgery in a procedure called TEMS (transanal endoscopic microsurgery). Patients undergoing TEMS can benefit from reduced mortality, impotence, hospital stay and avoiding a stoma that may be associated with pelvic surgery. Currently few of the patients eligible for TEMS are offered it for a variety of reasons that include uncertainties about the risk of leaving residual tumour and the increased risk of subsequent recurrence of cancer within the pelvis. Current UK guidelines state there is no role for imaging in assessing the malignant polyp. Conversely whilst retrospectively reviewing their MRI databank the investigators have found evidence that MRI can accurately judge the depth of these early tumours and thereby potentially identify patients for local excision. The investigators hope to prospectively test their hypothesis that an MRI scan can accurately gauge depth of tumour spread in an unselected group of benign and malignant tumours measuring between 20mm and 50mm in size. The investigators will identify eligible patients awaiting surgery / polypectomy and if they consent to this pilot study participants will undergo an MRI to assess their tumour which assesses safety at all levels of the rectal wall. The accuracy of MRI can then be established by reference to gold standard histopathology. Should MRI prove sensitive and specific then the investigators hope to change national guidelines to mandate MRI to standardise assessment and thereby increase the appropriate use of TEMS in the UK.

In recent years the concept of organ sparing treatment in rectal cancer was introduced for selected good responders after neo-adjuvant treatment. In these patients replacement of the standard of care total mesorectal excision (TME) by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or omission of surgery after chemoradiation (CRT) was proposed. Before organ sparing treatments could be applied in clinical practice a reliable patient selection procedure has to be available as only good treatment responders after neo-adjuvant therapy are candidates for such adapted therapy. Different imaging modalities have been studied for their ability to distinguish good treatment responders from others. Examples of such imaging modalities with some promising results regarding response assessment are fludeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography (FDG-PET), T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2w-MRI), dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted MR imaging (DW-MRI). Besides these modalities dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) is a new modality used for tissue characterization and therapy response assessment in several tumor locations, like liver tumors and breast cancer. D-CEUS reflect tissue vascular perfusion. For rectal cancer, the value of D-CEUS for pathological response prediction and assessment has never been assessed. Therefore, in this study we assessed D-CEUS to predict and assess pathological response in rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant CRT.

Background: -Coordinated cancer care provided by doctors, nurses, social workers, and other care providers is believed to improve patient and physician satisfaction and patient evaluation for enrollment in clinical trials. But no research has been done to show that this approach improves patient experiences and outcomes. Researchers want to study this model to better understand how it can improve cancer treatment and patient outcomes. Objectives: - To assess the relationship between coordinated care and cancer treatment processes and outcomes. Eligibility: - Individuals who are at least 18 years of age. Those who take part must have been diagnosed with colon, rectal, or non-small-cell lung cancer. They also must be receiving or have been treated at one of the 16 NCI Community Cancer Center program sites. Design: Researchers will collect medical records data from participants. Participants will complete a questionnaire about 8 weeks after the end of all planned cancer treatment. They will be asked questions about their experience with coordinated cancer care. They will also be asked for any comments or concerns they had during and after treatment. No treatment or additional tests will be provided as part of this protocol.

Rationale and background: Predictive factors are needed to discriminate chemoradiotherapy responders from non-responders and to individualize the treatment regime. Various cytokines play a role in processes affecting tumour growth and metastasis. Furthermore, cytokines might influence treatment response. Various cytokines are abnormally expressed in colorectal cancer patients, are associated with colorectal cancer or determine response to chemoradiotherapy. Therefore the investigators want to investigate whether levels of circulating cytokines could predict response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesis is that the varying levels of circulating cytokines in the blood of rectal cancer patients may predict the response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Study design: This study is an explorative clinical pilot study in which the investigators will collect 4 ml of blood from a selection of rectal cancer patients during a regular venipuncture before, during and after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and before and after surgery. Cytokines will be measured in blood plasma and in tumour and healthy tissue from the resection specimen using multiplex immunoassays. Plasma cytokine measurements will be linked to pathological response to identify which cytokines and corresponding levels can predict response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Furthermore, blood plasma cytokine measurements before and after surgery will be compared to evaluate the effect of tumour resection on the immune response. In addition, preoperative blood plasma cytokine levels will be compared with cytokine levels in normal and tumour tissue to test whether circulating cytokine levels are representative for tissue cytokine levels. Study population: Thirty patients (≥18 years) with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma eligible for preoperative chemoradiotherapy (oral capecitabine and 45-50 gray (Gy) in total; fractions of 1.8-2 Gy) and surgery. Country of recruitment: The Netherlands

In case of rectal cancer surgery, temporary stoma is recommended to decrease the risk of postoperative anastomotic leakage. The aim of the study was to assess the benefit of an optimal care, i.e., both psychological and enterostomal therapy care.

RATIONALE: Studying samples of tumor tissue from patients with cancer in the laboratory may help doctors learn more about changes that occur in DNA and identify biomarkers related to cancer. It may also help doctors understand how patients respond to treatment. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying biomarkers in patients with rectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

While surgery remains the standard treatment for rectal cancer, some patients still firmly refuse surgery for various reasons. Here, we conducted this retrospective observation study to discuss the feasibility of high-dose radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in treating rectal cancer We retrospectively collect data of rectal cancer patients who were treated with high-dose radiotherapy plus chemotherapy in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from April 1st, 2006 to July 30th, 2017. Patients gave up surgery before any treatment would have received one course of high dose radiotherapy (GTV60-70Gy/30-35f). Patients with tumor residual after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy but insisted non-operative treatment would have received 2 courses of radiotherapy (1st: GTV 45-50Gy/25f, 2nd: GTV 30/15f). The chemotherapy regimens included Capox, FOLFOX, or capecitabine at the discretion of the treating physician. After treatment, patients were followed every 3 months for the first two years, at least every 6 months in the year thereafter. Recurrence, early and late toxicity were recorded. Analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Local recurrence and distant metastasis rate, progression free survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan Meier Method and were compared by log-rank test.

The aim of this 2-year study will assess the acceptability and feasibility of offering Problem Solving Skills Therapy (PSST) to cancer survivors and their caregivers focusing on the highest risk patients with distress.

Aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and the quality of life in the 6 months following the surgery of a pseudo continent perineal colostomy (PCPC) and a permanent left iliac colostomy (PLIC) following an abdominoperineal resection (APR) for ultra low rectal cancer

Robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction is a recently developed minimally invasive surgery for patients with rectal cancer. However, it's safety and feasibility remain undiscussed and controversial. This study reported the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of robotic assisted rectal cancer resection alone vs. robotic rectal cancer resection with natural orifice extraction to discuss aforementioned question.