Active clinical trials for "Rectal Prolapse"

Prolapse of the rectum is a pathology that preferentially affects older women with a significant impact on quality of life. A very large number of therapeutic approaches can be proposed (functional treatment, surgical techniques by perineal approach and surgical techniques by anterior approach). D'Hoore and Pennix described Ventral Rectopexy with prosthetic reinforcement which is accepted as a standard of treatment in much of Europe for externalized prolapse but remains maligned in much of the world. Due to the relatively recent appearance of this technique and the great variability in the management methods, the long-term results of Ventral Rectopexy have been little studied. This surgical technique is the preferred approach offered at CHU Grenoble Alpes. Pr Faucheron have internationally recognized experience in surgical grip with a very high patient volume in recent years.

This randomized study was designed to compare the 2 year clinical and functional results with the STARR procedure using a new curved cutter stapler or the same operation done with 2 traditional circular staplers.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the investigator new modification for delorme procedure in patients with rectal prolapse , assessing intra-operative morbidity and recurrence rate .

Curvilinear incision in the postanal space, through the intersphincteric plane, insertion of Proctoscope of TEM technique and dissection till sacral promontory, insertion of mesh between the rectum and sacrum, post anal repair then anal cerclage width absorbable suture.

The aim of the present prospective, double-blind, randomized study is to study whether laparoscopic anterior mesh rectopexy is as good as laparoscopic posterior rectopexy with respect to obstructive defecation afterwards.

Different studies showed large variation between care processes in multiple diseases, this leads to large variation in outcomes. Better adherence to evidence-based guidelines for these diseases can reduce this variation and can improve the health outcomes. Ventral mesh rectopexy has gained popularity in Europe to treat different rectal prolapse syndromes. This procedure has been shown to achieve acceptable anatomic results with low recurrence rates, few complications, and improvements of both constipation and fecal incontinence. However, there is limited data on the care process and outcomes. Moreover, there is no insight in the variation between different centers for patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy. This study aims to map the variation in care for patients undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy in Flemish hospitals and to get an overview about the variation within and between these hospitals. Hereby, this will be a repeat of the studies for colorectal cancer, fragility hip fractures, stroke and breast cancer surgery.

Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:

The aim is to compare proximate and remote results of 3D and conventional 2D laparoscopic interventions in terms of efficacy and safety in treatment of symptomatic rectocele and rectal prolapse. This is a prospective randomized comparative study in parallel groups conducted in single Colorectal unit. Inclusion criteria: female patients with stage 3 rectocele (3-4 POP-Q [pelvic organ prolapse quantification] grade) and/or full-thickness rectal prolapse. Intervention - laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. The primary outcome is objective cure rate of pelvic prolapse. Secondary outcomes include obstructive defecation and incontinence symptoms according to Wexner and Cleveland Clinic scales, and satisfaction according to Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Operative times, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postop pain severity, urinary incontinence, as well as surgical and mesh complications are also assessed. The specific point of interest in this study is surgeon's tiredness after the operation assessed with Profile of Mood States questionnaire.

The purpose of this study is to determine if the device is supplying sufficient diagnosis results of an internal rectal prolapse, of a pelvic floor ptosis and for the determination of an interal hernia into the Douglas pouch, as well as to determine the technical success of using the device at the patient.

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long needle and short needle in the treatment of internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse through CAES (Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy).